查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1932264

按技术、应用、形式、安装方法和车辆类别分類的汽车车身结构黏合剂市场－全球预测，2026-2032年

Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market by Technology, Application, Form, Installation Method, Vehicle Category - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 193 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，素车结构性黏着剂市场价值将达到 49.4 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 53.3 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 84.5 亿美元，年复合成长率为 7.96%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 49.4亿美元
预计年份：2026年 53.3亿美元
预测年份 2032 84.5亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 7.96%

全面剖析为何先进结构性黏着剂如今已成为现代素车组装策略的关键组成部分

随着汽车产业不断追求更轻的车身重量、更高的安全性和更佳的效率，素车组装中的结构性黏着剂的重要性日益凸显。这些黏合剂系统不再是无关紧要的耗材，而是影响车辆刚度、碰撞性能、NVH（噪音、振动和声振粗糙度）特性以及可製造性的关键设计要素。随着汽车製造商和一级供应商采用复合材料结构和更高强度的合金，黏合剂作为机械紧固件和焊接的补充，发挥着至关重要的作用，能够实现满足法规和性能要求、同时又不影响设计意图的多材料连接。

深入探讨黏合剂在素车组装的作用，以及正在重新定义跨职能设计选择的技术、製程和监管变革。

在材料创新、製程自动化和监管压力的共同推动下，素车结构性黏着剂领域正经历着变革性的转变。高抗拉强度钢、轻质铝材和复合材料板在复合材料结构中的应用，对黏合剂提出了更高的要求，包括优化的机械性能、多样化的固化特性以及与多种基材的兼容性。同时，点胶和涂覆製程的自动化程度也在不断提高，从而实现了严格的製程控制，并确保了高产量生产线上黏合品质的一致性。这些变革正在重塑原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和供应商在接头设计、组装顺序和品质保证方面的决策方式。

对近期美国关税如何影响黏合剂製造商和原始设备製造商的筹资策略、供应商多元化和供应链韧性进行分析评估。

2025年美国推出并不断演变的贸易措施，为黏合剂系统中的原料采购、入境物流和供应商关係管理带来了新的挑战。关税及相关贸易合规要求促使企业更加关注总到岸成本和供应商多元化，从而重新评估区域筹资策略和合约保障措施。因此，製造商和一级供应商正在重新评估关键单体、添加剂和聚合物前驱物的缓衝库存政策、前置作业时间假设和紧急时应对计画。

一种将黏合剂化学成分、应用功能、材料形态、应用方法和载体类别与实际开发挑战联繫起来的复杂細項分析

深入的市场区隔是製定切实可行的产品和市场推广策略的基础，每个细分维度都揭示了清晰的决策驱动因素和发展重点。在各个技术领域，相关人员会根据黏合性能、固化机制相容性和耐环境性来评估丙烯酸酯、环氧树脂、聚氨酯、硅烷改性聚合物和硅酮等材料。刚度和韧性之间的性能权衡，以及对涂漆表面、金属表面和复合材料基材的粘合力，决定了哪些化学成分适用于主要结构粘接，哪些适用于次要密封和增强应用。

对美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太市场中生产群集、法规和电气化趋势如何影响黏合剂应用进行策略性区域分析

区域趋势对结构性黏着剂的原料供应、法规遵循和应用路径有显着影响。在美洲，由于接近性大规模汽车生产基地和成熟的供应商体系，企业更加重视与自动化组装的整合，并致力于建立原始设备製造商 (OEM) 与黏合剂製造商之间的长期合作关係。这种环境有利于开发针对高通量应用最佳化的配方，并使其符合当地的环境法规和基材偏好。

检验地观点供应商模式、协作差异化以及黏合剂公司实现 OEM 级整合和认证奠定基础的能力。

结构性黏着剂产业的竞争格局呈现出多元化的特点，既有跨国化工企业，也有特种黏合剂配方商和集材料专业知识与应用工程于一体的综合供应商。领先的製造商凭藉深厚的配方能力、应用工程服务以及与原始设备製造商 (OEM) 客户共同开发解决方案的能力脱颖而出。这些公司投资于从实验室到生产线的检验流程，并提供全面的合格支援、长期共同开发契约和现场技术服务，以缩短组装时间并确保黏合品质的稳定性。

为产品、製造和销售领导者提供实用有效的建议，以加快认证流程、降低价值链风险并提高黏合剂的价值提案。

产业领导者若想将趋势分析转化为竞争优势，应在产品开发、生产製造和商业性推广等各领域进行协作。首先，应投资建造跨职能开发平台，将聚合物化学家、製程工程师和检验团队连接起来，以缩短认证週期，并确保配方能够大规模生产。同时，应重视模组化配方方法，以便快速替换原材料并调整产品性能，从而应对因区域原材料差异或关税而导致的采购变化。

我们采用透明的混合方法调查方法，结合一手技术访谈、文献综述和与产业工程标准的检验，得出可操作的见解。

这些研究结果背后的调查方法结合了定性一手研究、技术检验以及对二级资讯来源的三角验证，从而得出可靠且可操作的结论。一级资讯来源包括对来自原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和一级供应商的材料科学家、製造工程师、采购主管和应用专家的结构化访谈，并辅以技术研讨会，检验实际应用中的粘合挑战和固化限制。这些访谈深入分析了材料选择驱动因素、製程挑战和认证时间表。

简洁的结论概括了在现代素车专案中，将先进黏合剂定位为核心工程驱动因素（而不仅仅是商品）的战略必要性。

总之，结构性黏着剂已从辅助密封剂发展成为对车辆性能、可製造性和全生命週期结果产生根本性影响的战略材料。先进化学技术、自动化应用和检测以及不断变化的供应链模式的结合，使得材料和製程整合策略日益重要。那些能够将化学选择与组装架构相匹配、投资于应用工程并根据监管和贸易现实调整其供应链布局的企业，将更有利于充分发挥黏合剂赋能设计的潜力。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 按技术分類的汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

  • 丙烯酸纤维
  • 环氧树脂
  • 聚氨酯
  • 硅烷改性聚合物
  • 硅酮

第九章 汽车车身结构黏合剂市场（依应用领域划分）

  • 衝突管理
  • 面板黏合
  • 密封
  • 结构加固

第十章 汽车车身结构黏合剂市场（按类型划分）

  • 单组分类型
    • 热固型
    • 湿气固化型
  • 双组分型
    • 液体
    • 贴上

第十一章 依应用方法分類的汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

  • 自动化
  • 手动的

第十二章：黏合剂

  • 大型商用车辆
  • 轻型商用车
  • 搭乘用车

第十三章 按地区分類的汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章 汽车车身结构黏合剂市场（依类别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十五章 各国汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

第十七章 中国汽车车身结构黏合剂市场

第十八章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • 3M Company
  • Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
  • BASF SE
  • Chemence Limited
  • Cyberbond LLC
  • Delo Industrie Klebstoffe GmbH & Co. KGaA
  • Dow Inc.
  • Dymax Corporation
  • Franklin International
  • HB Fuller Company
  • Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
  • Hernon Manufacturing Inc.
  • Jowat SE
  • Master Bond Inc.
  • Panacol-Elosol GmbH
  • Permabond LLC
  • Pidilite Industries Limited
  • Sika AG
  • ThreeBond Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • Wacker Chemie AG
  • Weicon GmbH & Co. KG
Product Code: MRR-C36616F69879

The Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market was valued at USD 4.94 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.33 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.96%, reaching USD 8.45 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 4.94 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 5.33 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.45 billion
CAGR (%) 7.96%

A comprehensive introduction that frames why advanced structural adhesives are now mission-critical components in modern body-in-white vehicle assembly strategies

The automotive industry's relentless push toward lighter, safer, and more efficient vehicles has elevated the strategic importance of structural adhesives in body-in-white assemblies. These adhesive systems are no longer peripheral consumables; they are engineered enablers that influence vehicle stiffness, crash performance, NVH (noise, vibration, and harshness) characteristics, and manufacturability. As OEMs and tier suppliers integrate mixed-material architectures and higher-strength alloys, adhesives serve as critical complements to mechanical fastening and welding, enabling multimaterial joining that preserves design intent while meeting regulatory and performance demands.

Consequently, material selection and process integration have moved to the forefront of product and manufacturing conversations. The intersection of chemistry, cure mechanism, and application method defines how an adhesive will behave during joining and throughout the vehicle lifecycle. Product developers must balance toughened elastomeric behavior for energy absorption with rigid bonding for load transfer, and manufacturing engineers must reconcile cure schedules with cycle time targets. Moreover, supply chain and sustainability considerations increasingly influence specification decisions, with stakeholders seeking adhesives that align with recyclability goals and closed-loop manufacturing initiatives.

In this context, a clear understanding of technology types, application domains, form factors, installation methods, and vehicle segments is essential for stakeholders looking to optimize assembly strategies and future-proof component design.

A detailed exploration of technological, process, and regulatory shifts that are redefining adhesive roles in body-in-white assembly and cross-functional design choices

The landscape for body-in-white structural adhesives is undergoing transformative shifts driven by material innovation, process automation, and regulatory pressures. High-strength steels and lightweight aluminum and composite panels are entering mixed-material structures that demand adhesives with tailored mechanical performance, variable cure profiles, and compatibility with diverse substrates. In parallel, automation in dispensing and application is accelerating, enabling tighter process control and consistent bond quality across high-volume lines. These shifts are reshaping how OEMs and suppliers approach joint design, assembly sequencing, and quality assurance.

Additionally, evolving safety standards and crash management philosophies are compelling designers to leverage adhesives for controlled energy distribution and improved crashworthiness. Advances in polymer science have produced silane-modified polymers and hybrid chemistries that merge elasticity with structural integrity, broadening the palette of adhesives credible for primary or supplemental load paths. Transitioning from manual to automated application not only reduces variability but also unlocks new polymer forms and cure strategies that were previously impractical in manual operations.

Taken together, these trends promote cross-functional collaboration between materials scientists, process engineers, and service teams. The net effect is a redefinition of material roles within the body-in-white, where adhesives are integral to meeting performance targets while enabling lighter, safer, and more manufacturable vehicle architectures.

An analytical assessment of how recent U.S. tariff measures have reshaped sourcing strategies, supplier diversification, and supply chain resilience for adhesive producers and OEMs

The imposition and evolution of trade measures originating from the United States in 2025 introduced fresh considerations for raw material sourcing, inbound logistics, and supplier relationship management within the adhesives ecosystem. Tariffs and associated trade compliance requirements have amplified focus on total landed cost and supplier diversification, prompting procurement teams to reassess regional sourcing strategies and contractual protections. Consequently, manufacturers and tier suppliers are re-evaluating buffer inventory policies, lead-time assumptions, and contingency plans for critical monomers, additives, and polymer precursors.

Beyond direct input-cost pressure, tariff-related measures influence supply chain architecture by creating incentives for nearshoring and localized value capture. Firms are increasingly weighing the trade-offs between cost efficiency achieved through global sourcing and resilience achieved through proximal supply bases. This dynamic has spurred negotiations around long-term supply agreements, dual-sourcing strategies, and the adoption of value-engineering initiatives to reduce dependency on tariff-exposed feedstocks.

Compliance and documentation burdens have also increased administrative overhead, accelerating investments in digital trade-management tools and cross-border logistics expertise. Finally, regulatory uncertainty has intensified the premium on flexibility: design teams are prioritizing formulations that can be adapted for alternate feedstocks or regional manufacturing footprints without compromising adhesive performance, thereby preserving product continuity amid shifting trade landscapes.

A nuanced set of segmentation insights linking adhesive chemistries, application functions, material forms, installation methods, and vehicle categories to practical development imperatives

Insightful segmentation is the foundation for actionable product and go-to-market strategies, and each axis reveals distinct decision drivers and development priorities. Across technology, stakeholders are evaluating acrylics, epoxies, polyurethanes, silane-modified polymers, and silicones through lenses of bonding performance, cure mechanism compatibility, and environmental resistance. Performance trade-offs between stiffness and toughness, as well as adhesion across painted, metallic, and composite substrates, influence which chemistries are specified for primary structural bonds versus secondary sealing or reinforcement roles.

Application-driven segmentation highlights differentiated functional demands. Crash management applications prioritize energy absorption and controlled deformation paths, whereas panel bonding emphasizes joint stiffness, fatigue life, and cosmetic durability. Sealing applications require durable environmental protection and flexible adhesion, while structural reinforcement demands high shear and peel strength under cyclic loading. Understanding these distinctions enables developers to align material architectures to end-use performance requirements.

Form-based considerations further refine material selection. One-part systems, divided into heat-cure and moisture-cure variants, offer process simplicity and reduced handling complexity for certain assembly lines; two-part systems, available in liquid and paste formats, deliver higher performance and controlled pot-life for demanding structural joins. Installation method segmentation distinguishes between automated and manual application, with automation enabling tighter tolerances, repeatability, and higher throughput, while manual methods retain importance in low-volume or repair contexts. Finally, vehicle category segmentation differentiates priorities across heavy commercial vehicles, light commercial vehicles, and passenger cars, reflecting varying duty cycles, service expectations, and lifecycle requirements. Integrating these segmentation lenses yields a nuanced matrix for product roadmap decisions and supplier positioning.

A strategic regional analysis of how production clusters, regulation, and electrification trends are shaping adhesive adoption in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific markets

Regional dynamics exert strong influence on raw material accessibility, regulatory compliance, and adoption pathways for structural adhesives. In the Americas, proximity to large automotive production hubs and an established supplier base drive emphasis on integration with automated assembly lines and long-standing relationships between OEMs and adhesive manufacturers. This environment encourages development of formulations optimized for high-throughput application and alignment with local environmental regulations and substrate preferences.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency around end-of-life vehicle recycling and chemical safety has heightened attention to adhesives that facilitate disassembly and material recovery. The region's advanced engineering centers often prioritize high-performance chemistries that enable lightweight multimaterial structures, alongside robust validation protocols for crashworthiness and durability under diverse climatic conditions.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid electrification and continued growth of regional vehicle platforms are accelerating demand for adhesives that support mixed-material construction and scalable manufacturing. The combination of agile suppliers, expanding automation adoption, and proximity to key raw material producers fosters experimentation with novel formulations and hybrid bonding techniques. Taken together, these regional profiles underscore the need for tailored commercial strategies that reflect local regulatory environments, manufacturing maturity, and platform-specific performance requirements.

A clear-eyed examination of supplier archetypes, collaborative differentiation, and the capabilities that enable adhesives companies to secure OEM-level integration and validation

Competitive dynamics in the structural adhesives space are characterized by a mix of multinational chemical companies, specialized adhesive formulators, and integrated tier suppliers that combine materials expertise with application engineering. Leading manufacturers differentiate through deep formulation capabilities, application engineering services, and the ability to co-develop solutions with OEM customers. These firms invest in lab-to-line validation, offering extensive qualification support, long-term joint development agreements, and localized technical service to reduce time-to-assembly and ensure consistent bond quality.

Specialist players and startups contribute by advancing niche chemistries and targeted performance breakthroughs, often focusing on low-VOC formulations, novel crosslinking mechanisms, or enhanced substrate compatibility for composites and coated surfaces. Tier-1 assembly partners and contract manufacturers are carving out positions by bundling application systems, automation know-how, and warranty-aligned quality processes, thereby creating integrated offerings that reduce OEM integration risk.

Across the competitive landscape, collaboration is a differentiator: successful companies pair chemistry leadership with systems-level thinking about dispense equipment, cure optimization, and inspection technologies. Companies that excel in rapid qualification, localized production footprints, and transparent supply chains are best positioned to capture incremental specification opportunities, especially as vehicle architectures diversify and regulatory expectations evolve.

Practical, high-impact recommendations for product, operations, and commercial leaders to accelerate qualification, de-risk supply chains, and elevate adhesive value propositions

Industry leaders seeking to convert trend analysis into competitive advantage should pursue coordinated actions across product development, manufacturing, and commercial engagement. First, invest in cross-functional development platforms that align polymer chemists, process engineers, and validation teams to shorten qualification cycles and ensure formulations are manufacturable at scale. Emphasize modular formulation approaches that allow rapid substitution of feedstocks or property tuning to adapt to regional raw material variability or tariff-driven sourcing changes.

Second, accelerate integration of automated dispensing and inline quality inspection to reduce variability and enable tighter process windows. Automation not only improves bond consistency but also unlocks the potential for more advanced chemistries with precise mix and pot-life requirements. Simultaneously, cultivate dual-sourcing and nearshore supplier relationships where feasible to hedge exposure to trade measures and logistics disruptions while maintaining cost discipline through value-engineering initiatives.

Third, embed sustainability metrics into adhesive specification processes, focusing on recyclability and lower-emission chemistry options that align with OEM lifecycle targets. Finally, strengthen commercial collaborations with OEMs by offering application engineering, training, and warranty-aligned performance guarantees. These combined actions will improve resilience, speed product introductions, and enhance the credibility of adhesives as strategic enablers of modern body-in-white design.

A transparent mixed-methods research methodology that combines primary technical interviews, literature review, and validation against industry engineering standards to support actionable findings

The research approach underpinning these insights combines qualitative primary engagement with technical validation and secondary-source triangulation to ensure robust, practical conclusions. Primary inputs include structured interviews with materials scientists, manufacturing engineers, procurement leaders, and application specialists across OEMs and tier suppliers, supplemented by technical workshops that examine real-world bonding challenges and cure constraints. These conversations provide ground-truth on material selection drivers, process pain points, and qualification timelines.

Secondary analysis draws on peer-reviewed materials science literature, regulatory documentation, patent landscapes, and publicly available technical dossiers from adhesive and automotive technology forums to contextualize primary findings. Laboratory validation insights are incorporated through review of vendor qualification protocols, white papers, and independently published performance test results that elucidate adhesion mechanisms across substrates and cure conditions. Where appropriate, the methodology emphasizes reproducibility by cross-checking claims against multiple independent sources and correlating qualitative feedback with documented engineering standards.

This mixed-methods approach balances depth and applicability, ensuring that the conclusions and recommendations reflect operational realities and are actionable for both R&D and manufacturing stakeholders.

A concise conclusion synthesizing the strategic imperative for treating advanced adhesives as core engineering enablers in modern body-in-white programs rather than as commodity inputs

In closing, structural adhesives have evolved from auxiliary sealants into strategic materials that materially influence vehicle performance, manufacturability, and lifecycle outcomes. The convergence of advanced chemistries, automation in dispensing and inspection, and shifting supply chain paradigms has elevated the importance of integrated material and process strategies. Organizations that align chemistry selection with assembly architecture, invest in application engineering, and adapt supply chain footprints to regulatory and trade realities will be better positioned to realize the full potential of adhesive-enabled designs.

Moreover, segmentation by technology, application, form, installation method, and vehicle category provides a practical framework for prioritizing development efforts and commercial investments. Regional dynamics and tariff-related pressures further underscore the benefits of flexible formulations, near-term contingency planning, and close collaboration between suppliers and OEMs. Ultimately, the path to sustained competitiveness lies in treating adhesives as core engineering disciplines rather than commodity inputs: prioritizing quick qualification, scalable manufacturing, and demonstrable lifecycle advantages will differentiate market leaders in an increasingly complex body-in-white landscape.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Technology

  • 8.1. Acrylic
  • 8.2. Epoxy
  • 8.3. Polyurethane
  • 8.4. Silane Modified Polymer
  • 8.5. Silicone

9. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Application

  • 9.1. Crash Management
  • 9.2. Panel Bonding
  • 9.3. Sealing
  • 9.4. Structural Reinforcement

10. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Form

  • 10.1. One Part
    • 10.1.1. Heat Cure
    • 10.1.2. Moisture Cure
  • 10.2. Two Part
    • 10.2.1. Liquid
    • 10.2.2. Paste

11. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Installation Method

  • 11.1. Automated
  • 11.2. Manual

12. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Vehicle Category

  • 12.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicle
  • 12.2. Light Commercial Vehicle
  • 12.3. Passenger Vehicle

13. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market

17. China Body-in-White Structural Adhesives Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. 3M Company
  • 18.6. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
  • 18.7. BASF SE
  • 18.8. Chemence Limited
  • 18.9. Cyberbond LLC
  • 18.10. Delo Industrie Klebstoffe GmbH & Co. KGaA
  • 18.11. Dow Inc.
  • 18.12. Dymax Corporation
  • 18.13. Franklin International
  • 18.14. H.B. Fuller Company
  • 18.15. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
  • 18.16. Hernon Manufacturing Inc.
  • 18.17. Jowat SE
  • 18.18. Master Bond Inc.
  • 18.19. Panacol-Elosol GmbH
  • 18.20. Permabond LLC
  • 18.21. Pidilite Industries Limited
  • 18.22. Sika AG
  • 18.23. ThreeBond Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 18.24. Wacker Chemie AG
  • 18.25. Weicon GmbH & Co. KG

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ACRYLIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ACRYLIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ACRYLIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY EPOXY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY EPOXY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY EPOXY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILANE MODIFIED POLYMER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILANE MODIFIED POLYMER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILANE MODIFIED POLYMER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILICONE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILICONE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SILICONE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY CRASH MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY CRASH MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY CRASH MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PANEL BONDING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PANEL BONDING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PANEL BONDING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAT CURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAT CURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAT CURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE CURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE CURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE CURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASTE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASTE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASTE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY ONE PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO PART, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA BODY-IN-WHITE STRUCTURAL ADHESIVES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE CATEGORY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)