乏燃料回收和储存市场：按储存方法、材料类型、最终用户和服务类型分類的全球预测，2026-2032年

预计到 2025 年，乏燃料回收和储存市场价值将达到 78.4 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长到 84.1 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 125.6 亿美元，复合年增长率为 6.96%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025	78.4亿美元
预计年份：2026年	84.1亿美元
预测年份 2032	125.6亿美元
复合年增长率 (%)	6.96%

这是一部权威的导论，系统地阐述了影响乏燃料后处理和储存方案选择的技术、法规和相关人员策略之间的复杂相互作用。

核燃料生命週期管理需要采用综合方法，兼顾技术严谨性、法规遵循、策略规划。本导言概述了后处理技术和储存结构之间复杂的相互作用框架，并重点阐述了影响专案决策的管治和利害关係人相关人员。后续章节将阐明一些核心驱动因素，例如不断变化的政策预期、分离和调整製程的技术进步，以及临时和长期储存的后勤实际情况。

本文简要检验了技术、法规和相关人员期望方面的最新模式转移如何重新定义乏燃料后处理和储存策略。

近期发生的变革性变化正在重塑乏燃料回收和储存的策略理念和营运实施方式。化学分离和电化学技术的进步催生了新的回收途径，而容器和储存技术的同步发展则提升了储存的柔软性。同时，法规结构也在不断改进，以适应长期管理责任，这正在改变许可流程和合规时间表。

分析见解：2025 年推出的关税措施如何改变了整个产业的采购趋势、供应链韧性和产业参与策略。

2025年公布的关税和贸易相关政策措施，为乏核燃料后处理和储存相关营业单位的成本结构和供应链规划引入了新的变数。关税调整将影响进口专用零件和服务以及发展国内製造能力的相对吸引力，这可能会即时对采购计划造成压力，因为各企业需要重新审视其供应商组合和合约条款。

详细的细分市场分析，将储存方法、材料类型、再加工过程、最终用户需求和服务模式与专案设计和营运重点连结起来。

细分领域的洞察揭示了不同的技术选择和服务模式如何影响专案优先顺序和资源分配。在考虑储存方法时，干式储存方式（例如桶式储存和库式储存）与湿式储存方式（例如池式储存）相比，其运作特性有所不同。干式系统往往专注于模组化部署和被动式温度控管，而湿式系统则优先考虑集中式冷却和库存管理技术。材料类型也会影响回收策略。混合氧化物和氧化铀的原料特性需要适当的分离化学处理和加工步骤，这会影响下游製程的处理和安全措施。

全面的区域资讯揭示了美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区如何塑造各自的政策方向、技术采用和伙伴关係模式。

区域趋势对乏燃料后处理和储存领域的政策选择、技术应用和商业性伙伴关係有显着影响。在美洲，现有库存水准、不断演变的法规结构以及工业产能等因素共同决定了专案方向，其中对国内製造能力和全生命週期管理体系的关注度日益提高。同时，欧洲、中东和非洲地区则呈现多样化的发展模式。有些地区强调多边合作和技术平台共用，而有些地区则根据地质条件和公共目标，寻求制定符合本国国情的解决方案。

对提供安全、可扩展的再处理和储存解决方案的技术供应商、营运商、製造商和机构合作伙伴的生态系统进行策略概述。

主要企业和机构正在推动整个乏燃料回收和储存领域的创新、供应链能力建设和专案实施。技术供应商致力于改善分离化学、燃料调整、储存槽设计和监测系统，而工程和建造公司则将概念设计转化为可获得许可的设施。营运商和电力公司在确定性能要求和可行性限制方面发挥核心作用，而研究机构则提供独立的评估和测试以获得监管部门的核准。

为高阶主管提供切实可行的建议，以加强供应链韧性、加快模组化部署并确保相关人员对长期专案成功的信心。

产业领导者应采取果断行动，提升专案韧性，加速技术成熟，并增强相关人员的信心。首先，他们应进行全面的供应链风险评估，识别单点故障，评估替代筹资策略，并为关键零件和服务制定紧急时应对计画。这将减少采购中断，并使进度安排更好地与许可流程相符。其次，领导者应优先考虑模组化和分阶段部​​署策略。这将有助于在严格监控下逐步扩大产能，降低前期投资风险，并促进适应性学习。

为了便于制定实际的方案决策，我们采用了稳健的混合方法调查方法，结合了专家访谈、技术文献综述、监管分析和基于情境的评估。

本研究采用多面向方法，整合技术文献、法规分析和专家访谈，以确保获得平衡且基于证据的观点。此方法将工程师、政策顾问和专案经理等一手资料与同行评审的研究论文、技术标准和公共监管申请等二级资讯来源结合。透过对这些资讯来源进行三角验证，交叉检验各项论点并明确证据共识，从而得出可靠的结论。

作为策略性结论，我们强调，一体化的方案设计、健全的采购系统和协作管治对于有效处理和储存乏燃料至关重要。

总之，透过回收和储存有效管理乏燃料需要整合策略，该策略应协调技术选择、法规遵循和相关人员参与。虽然分离技术和储存系统设计的进步正在拓展选择范围，但成功实施仍需要具有韧性的供应链、适应性强的管治以及与值得信赖的社区的合作。关税和贸易政策的趋势为采购和产业政策带来了新的考量，凸显了来源多元化和发展本地能力的重要性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

• 调查设计
• 研究框架
• 市场规模预测
• 数据三角测量
• 调查结果
• 调查的前提
• 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

• 首席体验长观点
• 市场规模和成长趋势
• 2025年市占率分析
• FPNV定位矩阵，2025
• 新的商机
• 下一代经营模式
• 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

• 产业生态系与价值链分析
• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL 分析
• 市场展望
• 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

• 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
• 消费者体验基准
• 机会映射
• 分销通路分析
• 价格趋势分析
• 监理合规和标准框架
• ESG与永续性分析
• 中断和风险情景
• 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章：乏燃料回收与储存市场（依储存方式划分）

• 干货储存
  • 酒桶储存
  • 地下仓储设施
• 湿储存

第九章：乏燃料回收与储存市场：依材料类型划分

• 混合氧化物
• 铀氧化物

第十章：乏燃料回收与储存市场：依最终用户划分

• 海军核子反应炉
• 核能发电厂
• 研究核子反应炉

第十一章：乏燃料回收与储存市场：依服务类型划分

• 中间储存
  • 在核子反应炉区内
  • 核子反应炉设施外
• 永久处置
  • 深地质处置
  • 地质处置

第十二章 乏燃料回收与储存市场：依地区划分

• 北美洲和南美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 欧洲、中东和非洲
  • 欧洲
  • 中东
  • 非洲
• 亚太地区

第十三章：乏燃料回收与储存市场：依类别划分

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第十四章 乏燃料回收与储存市场：依国家划分

• 我们
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国

第十五章：美国乏燃料回收与储存市场

第十六章：中国乏燃料回收与储存市场

第十七章 竞争格局

• 市场集中度分析，2025年
  • 浓度比（CR）
  • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
• 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
• 2025年产品系列分析
• 基准分析，2025 年
• Agence Nationale pour la gestion des Dechets Radioactifs
• Augean PLC
• Babcock International Group PLC
• Bechtel Group Inc.
• China National Nuclear Corporation
• EnergySolutions Inc.
• Fluor Corporation
• Framatome SA
• General Atomics
• GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
• Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy Ltd.
• Holtec International Inc.
• Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited
• Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
• NAC International Inc.
• Ontario Power Generation Inc.
• Orano SA
• Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
• Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
• Studsvik AB
• Svensk Karnbranslehantering Aktiebolag
• Veolia Environnement SA
• Waste Control Specialists LLC
• Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

The Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market was valued at USD 7.84 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 8.41 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.96%, reaching USD 12.56 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 7.84 billion
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 8.41 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 12.56 billion
CAGR (%)	6.96%

An authoritative introduction framing the complex intersections of technology, regulation, and stakeholder strategy that drive spent fuel recycling and storage program choices

The nuclear fuel lifecycle demands an integrated approach that balances technical rigor, regulatory compliance, and strategic planning. This introduction frames the complex interplay between recycling technologies and storage architectures, while highlighting the governance and stakeholder dimensions that shape program decisions. The content that follows articulates core drivers including evolving policy expectations, technological progress in separation and conditioning processes, and the logistical realities of interim and long-term storage.

Across jurisdictions, decision-makers increasingly emphasize risk-informed approaches that align safety, security, and non-proliferation priorities with economic and environmental considerations. Consequently, organizations must assess operational trade-offs-ranging from capital intensity and workforce requirements to licensing pathways and community acceptance. In addition, international collaboration and harmonized standards are becoming more salient as countries seek to optimize life-cycle management and minimize long-term liabilities.

This introduction prepares readers to engage with subsequent sections by setting expectations about the types of evidence, analytical perspectives, and decision levers that underpin contemporary program design. It underscores the need for actionable intelligence that supports both near-term operational choices and strategic investments in recycling and storage infrastructure.

A concise examination of recent paradigm shifts in technology, regulation, and stakeholder expectations that are redefining spent fuel recycling and storage strategies

Recent transformative shifts are reshaping both the strategic rationale and operational implementation of spent fuel recycling and storage. Advances in chemical separation and electrochemical techniques are enabling new recycling pathways, while parallel developments in cask and vault technologies are expanding storage flexibility. Meanwhile, regulatory frameworks are maturing to address long-duration stewardship, which changes licensing trajectories and compliance timelines.

Equally important, public expectations and social license considerations are influencing siting and community engagement strategies. As a result, program leaders must integrate early and transparent stakeholder outreach with robust risk communication plans. In addition, supply chain resilience has emerged as a critical focus, prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for critical materials, fabrication capacity for storage systems, and contingency planning for cross-border dependencies.

Taken together, these shifts require a recalibration of business models and project delivery approaches. Decision-makers should expect higher scrutiny on safety and environmental performance, and they must prioritize adaptive governance mechanisms that can respond to changing technical evidence and geopolitical dynamics.

Analytical insights into how tariff measures introduced in 2025 have altered procurement dynamics, supply chain resilience, and industrial participation strategies across the sector

Policy measures announced in 2025 affecting tariffs and trade have introduced new variables into cost structures and supply chain planning for entities engaged in recycling and storage of spent nuclear fuel. Tariff adjustments influence the relative attractiveness of importing specialized components and services versus developing domestic manufacturing capacity, and they can create immediate pressure on procurement timelines as organizations reevaluate supplier portfolios and contractual terms.

In response, project planners are increasingly conducting scenario-based supply chain analyses and stress-testing procurement strategies to identify critical dependencies and potential points of disruption. These analyses are informing decisions about near-term inventory buffers, strategic stockpiles for critical consumables, and whether to accelerate investments in local fabrication capabilities for casks, modular storage systems, and separation equipment. Moreover, regulatory compliance and customs procedures are receiving closer scrutiny to mitigate delays at borders and ensure continuity of specialized transport and handling services.

Importantly, tariffs also interact with procurement policies that prioritize domestic industrial participation and workforce development. As a result, program owners are balancing short-term cost impacts with longer-term industrial strategy objectives, including the potential benefits of cultivating in-country capabilities that strengthen national sovereignty over sensitive nuclear infrastructure. In sum, the tariff environment has heightened the emphasis on resilient procurement design and diversified supplier networks.

In-depth segmentation insights that link storage methods, material types, recycling processes, end-user needs, and service models to program design and operational priorities

Segment-level insights reveal how different technology choices and service models direct program priorities and resource allocation. When considering storage method, dry storage pathways such as cask storage and vault storage present distinct operational profiles compared with wet storage options like pool storage; dry systems often emphasize modular deployment and passive heat management, while wet systems prioritize centralized cooling and inventory management practices. Material type also shapes recycling strategy, as feedstock characteristics for mixed oxide and uranium oxide require tailored separation chemistries and conditioning steps that influence downstream handling and safeguards.

Recycling processes further differentiate technological readiness and facility complexity. Aqueous separation routes such as PUREX have established industrial practice, whereas pyroprocessing approaches-comprising electrorefining and molten salt process variants-introduce alternative material flows and potentially different waste streams. UREX and other advanced partitioning concepts add further nuance to process integration and radiological protection planning. End-user segmentation reflects operational priorities: naval reactors demand compact, high-assurance solutions for secure propulsion fuel management; commercial nuclear power plants focus on throughput, regulatory consistency, and long-term stewardship obligations; research reactors emphasize flexibility and specialized conditioning for varied experimental fuels.

Service type distinctions drive planning horizons and stakeholder expectations. Interim storage options include at-reactor-site arrangements and away-from-reactor-site facilities, which carry differing implications for transportation logistics, security protocols, and community engagement. Permanent disposal alternatives such as deep borehole disposal and geological disposal each entail unique site characterization, long-term monitoring, and institutional control strategies. Integrating these segmentation dimensions enables more granular program design that aligns technology, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations.

Comprehensive regional intelligence that clarifies how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each shape policy direction, technology uptake, and partnership models

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on policy choices, technology adoption, and commercial partnerships across the spent fuel recycling and storage landscape. In the Americas, a combination of legacy inventories, evolving regulatory frameworks, and industrial capacity considerations shapes program trajectories, with increased attention to domestic fabrication and lifecycle stewardship arrangements. Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous mix of approaches: some jurisdictions emphasize multinational cooperation and shared technical platforms, while others pursue nationally tailored solutions based on geological suitability and public policy objectives.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid energy demand growth and an expanding fleet of reactors are driving significant interest in both recycling innovation and modular storage solutions. Cross-border collaborations and technology partnerships are common, reflecting both commercial opportunities and efforts to harmonize safety standards. Across all regions, geopolitical shifts and trade policy changes influence supply chains, while public engagement and institutional capacity determine the pace at which complex programs move from concept to implementation.

Consequently, stakeholders planning international projects must factor in regional regulatory harmonization, licensing practices, workforce availability, and cultural approaches to risk communication. A regionally informed strategy supports targeted investments, appropriate contracting models, and effective stakeholder outreach.

A strategic overview of the ecosystem of technology providers, operators, manufacturers, and institutional partners that enable safe and scalable recycling and storage solutions

Key companies and institutional actors drive innovation, supply chain capabilities, and program execution across the spent fuel recycling and storage domain. Technology vendors contribute to improvements in separation chemistry, fuel conditioning, cask design, and monitoring systems, while engineering and construction firms translate conceptual designs into licensable facilities. Operators and utilities play a central role in defining performance requirements and feasibility constraints, and research institutions provide independent evaluation and testing that informs regulatory acceptance.

In addition, manufacturers of specialized components-such as thermal management systems, radiation-hardened electronics, and heavy fabrication services-remain critical enablers of deployment timelines. Financial and advisory firms support contractual structures and public-private partnership arrangements, especially for long-duration stewardship obligations. Finally, standards organizations and international nuclear agencies shape interoperability and best-practice guidance, bringing technical rigor to safety, security, and safeguards considerations.

Collectively, these actors form an ecosystem in which collaboration, risk-sharing, and transparent governance are essential to advance complex recycling and disposal projects. Stakeholders should prioritize partners with demonstrated regulatory experience, robust quality assurance programs, and a track record of delivering within stringent safety frameworks.

Actionable recommendations for senior executives to strengthen supply chain resilience, accelerate modular deployment, and secure stakeholder trust for long-term program success

Industry leaders should take decisive steps to increase program resilience, accelerate technology maturation, and strengthen stakeholder trust. First, they should implement comprehensive supply chain risk assessments that identify single points of failure, evaluate alternative sourcing strategies, and define contingency plans for critical components and services. By doing so, organizations can reduce procurement disruption and better align timelines with licensing processes. Second, leaders should prioritize modular and staged deployment strategies that allow incremental capacity increases while maintaining rigorous oversight, which reduces upfront capital exposure and facilitates adaptive learning.

Third, investing in community engagement and transparent risk communication yields dividends in permitting and social license; establishing independent advisory panels and third-party reviews can build public confidence. Fourth, organizations should seek strategic partnerships that combine technical expertise with project delivery capabilities, enabling shared risk and accelerated technology adoption. Fifth, workforce development initiatives, including upskilling programs and industry-academic partnerships, will be essential to sustain long-term operations and to support evolving technical demands.

Finally, decision-makers should integrate robust governance mechanisms that align safety, security, and non-proliferation objectives with commercial incentives. Collectively, these recommendations aim to balance near-term operational effectiveness with long-term stewardship responsibilities.

A robust mixed-methods research methodology combining expert interviews, technical literature review, regulatory analysis, and scenario-based evaluation to inform practical program decisions

This research applies a multi-method approach that synthesizes technical literature, regulatory analysis, and expert interviews to ensure a balanced and evidence-based perspective. The methodology integrates primary inputs from subject-matter experts, including engineers, policy advisors, and program managers, with secondary sources such as peer-reviewed studies, technical standards, and public regulatory filings. Triangulation of these sources supports robust conclusions by cross-validating claims and highlighting areas of convergent evidence.

Qualitative analysis explored technology readiness, operational constraints, and stakeholder perspectives, while process mapping identified critical interfaces among recycling, conditioning, transport, and storage systems. Regulatory review focused on licensing pathways, environmental assessment expectations, and international safeguards obligations, providing context for program design choices. Scenario analysis examined alternative procurement and deployment strategies to surface practical implications without projecting specific market values.

Throughout, the research emphasized transparency in assumptions and limitations, capturing known uncertainties and recommending areas for further technical validation. This methodological foundation ensures that findings are practical, defensible, and oriented toward informing policy and investment decisions.

A strategic conclusion emphasizing integrated program design, resilient procurement, and collaborative governance as essentials for effective spent fuel recycling and storage

In conclusion, effective management of spent fuel through recycling and storage requires an integrated strategy that aligns technology selection, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement. Progress in separation technologies and storage system design expands available options, yet successful implementation depends on resilient supply chains, adaptive governance, and credible community outreach. Tariff and trade policy dynamics have introduced new considerations for procurement and industrial policy, underscoring the importance of diversified sourcing and local capability development.

Segment-specific choices-spanning storage methods, material types, recycling processes, end-user needs, and service models-necessitate tailored program architectures that reflect technical constraints and policy priorities. Regional differences further influence licensing, partnership models, and public acceptance, which argues for context-sensitive strategies. Finally, collaboration across the ecosystem of technology vendors, operators, regulators, and research institutions remains essential to reconcile safety imperatives with commercial and societal objectives.

Taken together, these conclusions point toward a pragmatic pathway: pursue modular, staged deployment; invest in workforce and industrial capacity; adopt transparent stakeholder engagement practices; and design procurement strategies that balance near-term needs with long-term stewardship responsibilities.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Storage Method

• 8.1. Dry Storage
  • 8.1.1. Cask Storage
  • 8.1.2. Vault Storage
• 8.2. Wet Storage

9. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Material Type

• 9.1. Mixed Oxide
• 9.2. Uranium Oxide

10. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by End-User

• 10.1. Naval Reactors
• 10.2. Nuclear Power Plants
• 10.3. Research Reactors

11. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Service Type

• 11.1. Interim Storage
  • 11.1.1. At Reactor Site
  • 11.1.2. Away From Reactor Site
• 11.2. Permanent Disposal
  • 11.2.1. Deep Borehole Disposal
  • 11.2.2. Geological Disposal

12. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market

16. China Spent Fuel Recycling & Storage Market

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 17.5. Agence Nationale pour la gestion des Dechets Radioactifs
• 17.6. Augean PLC
• 17.7. Babcock International Group PLC
• 17.8. Bechtel Group Inc.
• 17.9. China National Nuclear Corporation
• 17.10. EnergySolutions Inc.
• 17.11. Fluor Corporation
• 17.12. Framatome SA
• 17.13. General Atomics
• 17.14. GNS Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Service mbH
• 17.15. Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy Ltd.
• 17.16. Holtec International Inc.
• 17.17. Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited
• 17.18. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
• 17.19. NAC International Inc.
• 17.20. Ontario Power Generation Inc.
• 17.21. Orano SA
• 17.22. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
• 17.23. Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
• 17.24. Studsvik AB
• 17.25. Svensk Karnbranslehantering Aktiebolag
• 17.26. Veolia Environnement SA
• 17.27. Waste Control Specialists LLC
• 17.28. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 12. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 2. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CASK STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY VAULT STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY WET STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MIXED OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY URANIUM OXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NAVAL REACTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH REACTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AT REACTOR SITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY AWAY FROM REACTOR SITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DEEP BOREHOLE DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. AMERICAS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. LATIN AMERICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 90. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 91. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 92. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 93. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 94. EUROPE SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 96. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 97. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 98. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 99. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 100. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 103. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 104. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 105. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 106. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 107. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 108. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 109. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 110. AFRICA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 111. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 112. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 113. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 114. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 116. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 119. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 120. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 121. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 122. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 123. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 124. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 125. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 126. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 127. ASEAN SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 128. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 129. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 130. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 131. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 132. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 133. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 134. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 135. GCC SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 136. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 144. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 145. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 146. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 147. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 148. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 149. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 150. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 151. BRICS SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 152. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 153. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 154. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 155. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 156. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 157. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 158. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 159. G7 SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 160. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 161. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 162. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 163. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 164. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 165. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 166. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 167. NATO SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 168. GLOBAL SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 169. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 170. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 171. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 172. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 173. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 174. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 175. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 176. UNITED STATES SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 177. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 178. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE METHOD, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 179. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 180. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 181. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 182. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 183. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIM STORAGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 184. CHINA SPENT FUEL RECYCLING & STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY PERMANENT DISPOSAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)