封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1981383

气体供应系统市场:依供应方式、气体类型、压力等级及最终用途划分-2026-2032年全球市场预测

Gas Delivery Systems Market by Delivery Mode, Gas Type, Pressure Class, End Use - Global Forecast 2026-2032

出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 196 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年,燃气供应系统市场价值将达到 197.1 亿美元,到 2026 年将成长至 209.6 亿美元,到 2032 年将达到 304.3 亿美元,复合年增长率为 6.40%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 197.1亿美元
预计年份:2026年 209.6亿美元
预测年份 2032 304.3亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 6.40%

策略实施定义了现代天然气供应系统的营运基础、相关人员的期望以及不断变化的优先事项。

工业和特种气体的供应环境融合了基础设施、精密处理以及严格的安全和管理体制。本导言概述了现代供应系统的关键概念,并重点阐述了实体物流、纯度要求和设备生命週期如何共同决定营运效率。此外,本导言也概述了采购惯例和供应商能力如何相互作用,以保障医疗、製造和能源等下游使用者的服务连续性。

权威概述了正在重塑各行业和供应链天然气供应系统的变革性技术、监管和商业性变化。

在技​​术、监管和客户体验需求的驱动下,天然气供应系统格局正在经历变革性变化。数位化正从先导计画走向营运最佳实践,基于远端资讯处理的气瓶追踪、压缩机和低温设备的预测性维护以及基于云端的库存管理正成为构建高弹性供应链的标配。这些功能可减少意外停气,提高整个物流生命週期的可视性,并实现更精准的供需匹配。

对 2025 年美国实施的关税措施对天然气供应链的累积营运和策略影响进行全面评估。

美国2025年生效的新关税措施,正促使整个天然气供应生态系统重新检视筹资策略、供应商合约和资本投资计画。进口零件、气瓶和专用设备的关税提高,推高了接收成本,迫使买家重新评估所有供应方案的总拥有成本(TCO)。为此,许多机构正在加快国内供应商的认证,调整采购週期以提前储备库存,并重组合约条款以分散或降低关税相关风险。

基于详细细分的洞察揭示了输送方式、气体类型、最终用途特性和压力等级如何影响技术选择、合约和服务设计。

明确划分市场区隔对于优化交付模式、商业提案和技术投资至关重要。根据交付模式的不同,市场参与企业必须仔细权衡每种方式的优点和缺点:气瓶输送、现场生产和管道输送。具体而言,应认识到气瓶系统具有柔软性和移动性,现场生产可实现持续供应并减少对运输的依赖,而管道输送则可在基础设施完善的地区实现规模经济。根据气体类型的不同,氩气、二氧化碳、氮气和氧气的操作和品管也存在显着差异,每种气体都有其自身的纯度、处理和储存要求,这些要求会影响设备规格和服务水准合约。

区域资讯整合了美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的基础设施成熟度、管理体制和客户需求多样性。

区域趋势影响着工业气体和特殊气体生产商、经销商和终端用户的策略决策。在美洲,成熟的物流网路和法规环境优先考虑营运可靠性、工人安全以及与先进製造地的整合。此外,美洲部分地区需求集中,管道基础设施与现场生产并存,这就要求供应商提供混合模式和灵活的贸易条款,以反映不同的区域条件和客户复杂的需求。

一项富有洞察力的企业级分析重点阐述了策略投资、伙伴关係和商业模式如何重塑供应商之间的竞争地位。

天然气供应产业的企业层面发展趋势反映了营运能力、技术差异化和策略伙伴关係之间的平衡。领先的供应商正在投资数位化平台,以管理气瓶池、实现远距离诊断并提供消费分析,从而提升客户忠诚度。诸如垂直整合到低温物流、拓展现场製气服务以及提供集天然气供应和维护于一体的综合服务等战略倡议,正在重新定义传统供应商的角色,使其从单纯的产品提供商转变为系统合作伙伴。

为行业领导者提供切实可行的建议,以透过策略性倡议增强韧性、加速脱碳并获得差异化的客户价值。

为因应不断变化的风险和机会,产业领导者应实施一系列切实可行的措施,以平衡短期业务永续营运和长期韧性。首先,应尽可能优先考虑供应链多元化和双重采购,以降低贸易中断和关税波动带来的风险。同时,应制定透明的风险分配和供应商绩效奖励机制。其次,应加快数位化监控和远端资讯处理技术,以提高气瓶持有量、压缩机运作状态和存量基准的透明度。这将有助于减少缺货并优化路线规划。

本报告说明了用于得出本报告中提出的循证见解和建议的透明且可重复的调查方法,包括资料收集、检验程序和分析框架。

这些研究结果是基于结构化且透明的调查方法,整合了一手和二手证据。一手资料包括对终端用户行业的采购经理、营运经理和技术专家的访谈,以及与供应商就交付模式、设备性能和服务经济性进行的对话。二级资讯来源包括监管指南、技术标准、专利文件和行业白皮书,这些资料揭示了安全通讯协定、设备规格和新兴技术的检验。研究人员对不同资讯来源的资料进行了三角验证,以协调不同的观点并检验观察到的运作模式。

综合考虑营运实际情况、贸易趋势和市场细分因素,得出简洁明了的结论,为相关人员。

本报告的最终综合分析将营运实际情况、贸易趋势和市场区隔复杂性交织在一起,为天然气供应系统相关人员建立了一个连贯的策略框架。实现可靠供应需要根据天然气的技术特性和终端用户的营运需求调整最佳供应模式,同时也要考虑区域基础设施和监管限制。收费系统和贸易政策的变化正在影响采购结构并加速本地化趋势,凸显了灵活的筹资策略和合约柔软性的重要性。

目录

第一章:序言

第二章:调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵,2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章:美国关税的累积影响,2025年

第七章:人工智慧的累积影响,2025年

第八章:天然气供应系统市场:依输送方式划分

  • 汽缸管
  • 现场生成
  • 管道

第九章:以气体类型分類的天然气供应系统市场

  • 氩气
  • 二氧化碳

第十章:依压力等级分類的瓦斯供应系统市场

  • 高压
  • 低压

第十一章 气体供应系统市场:依最终用途划分

  • 化学处理
  • 电子学
  • 食品/饮料
  • 卫生保健
  • 金属
  • 石油和天然气

第十二章 天然气供应系统市场:依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 气体供应系统市场:依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 天然气供应系统市场:依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章:美国天然气供应系统市场

第十六章:中国天然气供应系统市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析,2025年
    • 浓度比(CR)
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析,2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析,2025 年
  • Air Liquide SA
  • Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
  • Chart Industries, Inc.
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Iwatani Corporation
  • Linde plc
  • Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
  • Messer Group GmbH
  • Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation
Product Code: MRR-521BAA36EB36

The Gas Delivery Systems Market was valued at USD 19.71 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 20.96 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.40%, reaching USD 30.43 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 19.71 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 20.96 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 30.43 billion
CAGR (%) 6.40%

A strategic introduction that clarifies the operational foundations, stakeholder expectations, and evolving priorities defining contemporary gas delivery systems

The industrial and specialty gas delivery landscape sits at the intersection of infrastructure, precision handling, and stringent safety and regulatory regimes. This introduction frames the critical constructs that define modern delivery systems, emphasizing how physical logistics, purity requirements, and equipment life cycles collectively determine operational effectiveness. It outlines how procurement practices and provider capabilities interact to determine service continuity for downstream users in healthcare, manufacturing, and energy sectors.

Moving beyond a descriptive baseline, the section synthesizes how emerging priorities-such as environmental compliance, cost containment, and digital monitoring-are reshaping supplier selection and asset deployment. It clarifies terminology commonly used across delivery models and pressure classes, explains differences in service commitments across on-site generation versus cylinder-based supply, and highlights the interplay between gas type requirements and end-use specifications. The aim is to equip decision-makers with a pragmatic context that supports rapid appraisal of strategic choices and to set the stage for deeper diagnostic sections that follow.

An authoritative synthesis of the transformative technological, regulatory, and commercial shifts reshaping gas delivery systems across industries and supply chains

The landscape of gas delivery systems is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological, regulatory, and customer-experience imperatives. Digitalization has moved from pilot projects to operational best practice, with telematics-enabled cylinder tracking, predictive maintenance on compressors and cryogenic equipment, and cloud-based inventory management becoming standard features for resilient supply chains. These capabilities reduce unplanned outages and improve visibility across the logistics lifecycle, enabling closer alignment between supply and demand.

Sustainability mandates and decarbonization goals are influencing sourcing choices and prompting investment in lower-carbon delivery options and electrified compression solutions. Parallel to this, on-site generation technologies have matured, offering viable alternatives in contexts where purity requirements, continuous supply needs, or logistics constraints make centralized distribution less attractive. Geopolitical and trade dynamics have pushed many suppliers and end users to reconsider reliance on single-source imports and to explore regionalized manufacturing and redundancy in material flows. Meanwhile, end-use industries are demanding higher service differentiation: electronics and healthcare segments require increasingly stringent purity and traceability, while food and beverage customers prioritize supply continuity and regulatory compliance. Taken together, these shifts accelerate the convergence of operational excellence, sustainability, and digital enablement as core competencies for suppliers and buyers alike.

Comprehensive assessment of the cumulative operational and strategic implications arising from United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 on gas delivery supply chains

The introduction of new United States tariff measures effective in 2025 has prompted a reevaluation of sourcing strategies, supplier contracts, and capital investment plans across the gas delivery ecosystem. Higher duties on imported components, cylinders, and specialized equipment have increased landed costs and have driven buyers to reassess total cost of ownership across supply options. In response, several organizations have accelerated qualification of domestic suppliers, reengineered procurement windows to pre-position inventory, and restructured contractual terms to allocate or mitigate tariff-related exposures.

Tariff-induced cost pressure has also catalyzed strategic creativity: manufacturers and service providers are exploring modularization of systems to reduce cross-border component complexity, adapting product specifications to allow for increased local content, and negotiating multi-year frameworks that stabilize pricing. At the same time, logistics networks have pivoted to diversify routes and carriers to limit single-point vulnerabilities. These adjustments are not purely defensive; for many firms the tariff environment has accelerated inward investment in manufacturing and repair capabilities, shortens lead times, and fosters closer collaboration between end users and suppliers on design-for-localization initiatives. Regulatory responses and potential trade remedies in affected jurisdictions add further complexity, and companies that proactively model supply alternatives and contractual flexibilities will be positioned to maintain continuity and protect margin under these changing trade conditions.

Deep segmentation-driven insights that reveal how delivery mode, gas type, end-use characteristics, and pressure class shape technology choices, contracts, and service design

Segmentation clarity is essential for tailoring delivery models, commercial offers, and technology investments. Based on Delivery Mode, market participants must weigh trade-offs among Cylinder Tube, On Site Generation, and Pipeline approaches, recognizing that cylinder systems provide flexibility and mobility while on-site generation offers continuous supply and reduced transport dependency, and pipelines deliver economies of scale where infrastructure exists. Based on Gas Type, operational and quality controls diverge significantly across Argon, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen, and Oxygen, each presenting unique purity, handling, and storage requirements that influence equipment specifications and service level agreements.

Based on End Use, the requirements of Chemical Processing, Electronics, Food & Beverage, Healthcare, Metals, and Oil & Gas vary in terms of purity, continuity, and regulatory oversight, which in turn shape supplier differentiation and pricing structures. For example, electronics demand ultra-high purity and traceability, healthcare prioritizes sterility and immediate availability, and oil & gas applications often emphasize robustness and remote operability. Based on Pressure Class, distinctions between High Pressure and Low Pressure systems inform material selection, safety protocols, and maintenance cadences. High pressure solutions necessitate rigorous inspection regimes and specialized containment, while low pressure systems prioritize distribution efficiency and operational simplicity. Integrating these segmentation axes helps organizations design targeted service propositions, align capital investment with demand patterns, and deploy the right monitoring and maintenance regimes for each configuration.

Regional intelligence that reconciles infrastructure maturity, regulatory regimes, and customer demand diversity across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics shape the strategic calculus for producers, distributors, and end users of industrial and specialty gases. In the Americas, established logistics networks and a mature regulatory environment place a premium on operational reliability, workforce safety, and integration with advanced manufacturing sites. The Americas also present pockets of high-intensity demand where pipeline infrastructure and on-site generation coexist, compelling suppliers to offer hybrid models and flexible commercial terms that reflect diverse geography and customer sophistication.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and infrastructure variability require adaptive commercial models and local compliance expertise. Europe's aggressive decarbonization policies drive investment in low-carbon supply chains and electrified equipment, while the Middle East's role as a feedstock and industrial base shapes large-scale centralized supply models. Africa's infrastructure heterogeneity increases the importance of modular and portable solutions. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid industrialization, dense electronics manufacturing clusters, and healthcare expansion are fueling demand for high-purity gases and reliable delivery mechanisms. The Asia-Pacific context also features a broad spectrum of maturity from advanced urban centers to remote industrial corridors, incentivizing suppliers to scale digital monitoring for inventory and performance optimization. Across regions, differences in labor skillsets, logistics costs, and regulatory timelines require tailored go-to-market approaches and a differentiated mix of delivery modes to reliably serve end users.

Insightful company-level analysis highlighting how strategic investments, partnerships, and operational models are reshaping competitive positioning among suppliers

Company-level dynamics in the gas delivery sector reflect a balance of operational competence, technological differentiation, and strategic partnerships. Leading suppliers are investing in digital platforms to manage cylinder pools, enable remote diagnostics, and provide consumption analytics that strengthen customer stickiness. Strategic moves such as vertical integration into cryogenic logistics, expanded on-site generation offerings, and services that bundle maintenance with gas supply are redefining traditional supplier roles from commodity providers to systems partners.

Collaboration between equipment manufacturers, logistics providers, and service firms is increasingly important for delivering integrated solutions that meet complex end-use specifications. Alliances that combine local service networks with advanced equipment technologies help firms deliver consistent quality and speed in diverse geographies. At the same time, targeted M&A and joint ventures remain tools for quickly accessing distribution capacity, technical expertise, or regional regulatory know-how. Firms that prioritize scalable digital operations, invest in workforce competency for safety-critical services, and offer modular commercial models that align with customer cost and performance objectives are better positioned to capture long-term value in this evolving competitive landscape.

Actionable recommendations that enable industry leaders to reinforce resilience, accelerate decarbonization, and capture differentiated customer value through strategic initiatives

To respond to evolving risks and opportunities, industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions that reconcile short-term continuity with long-term resilience. First, prioritize supply-chain diversification and dual-sourcing where feasible to reduce exposure to trade disruptions and tariff volatility. This should be accompanied by contractual terms that allocate risk transparently and incentives for supplier performance. Second, accelerate deployment of digital monitoring and telematics to improve visibility of cylinder fleets, compressor health, and inventory levels, which reduces stockouts and optimizes route planning.

Third, invest in modular on-site generation and localized maintenance capabilities where logistics or regulatory environments make centralized supply uncertain; such investments can enhance customer retention through improved service flexibility. Fourth, integrate sustainability into procurement specifications and product roadmaps to align with customer decarbonization goals, including electrified compression and energy-source transparency. Fifth, upskill operations and field teams with targeted training programs to ensure rigorous safety compliance and to support complex installations. Finally, pursue collaborative commercial models-such as outcome-based contracts or bundled service agreements-that align incentives across the value chain and foster long-term partnerships with strategic customers. These actions, taken collectively, will strengthen operational resilience and unlock differentiated value in competitive procurement conversations.

Transparent and reproducible research methodology describing data collection, validation steps, and analytical frameworks used to generate the report's evidence-based insights and recommendations

The research underpinning these insights integrates primary and secondary evidence using a structured, transparent methodology. Primary inputs include interviews with procurement leaders, operations managers, and technical specialists across end-use industries, alongside supplier conversations focused on delivery models, equipment capabilities, and service economics. Secondary inputs comprise regulatory guidance, technical standards, patent literature, and industry white papers that elucidate safety protocols, equipment specifications, and emerging technology validation. Triangulation across sources was used to reconcile differing perspectives and to validate observed operational patterns.

Analytical techniques combined qualitative scenario analysis with comparative capability mapping to highlight where delivery models align with end-use needs and where gaps persist. Validation steps included peer review by subject-matter experts with hands-on experience in gas handling and logistics, and cross-checks against documented regulatory changes and trade measures. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility and transparency, enabling stakeholders to trace how conclusions were reached and to adapt the approach for bespoke internal analyses or supplier evaluations. All assessments are presented with explicit assumptions and documented evidence paths to support rigorous decision-making.

Concise concluding synthesis that integrates operational realities, trade dynamics, and segmentation considerations into a clear strategic direction for stakeholders

The concluding synthesis ties operational realities, trade dynamics, and segmentation complexity into a cohesive strategic narrative for stakeholders in gas delivery systems. Reliable supply depends on aligning the right delivery mode with the technical characteristics of the gas and the operational needs of the end user, while also accounting for regional infrastructure and regulatory constraints. Tariff environments and trade policy shifts influence procurement constructs and accelerate localization trends, underscoring the importance of adaptable sourcing strategies and contractual flexibility.

Forward-looking organizations will combine investment in digital capabilities with targeted operational changes-such as modularization and localized maintenance-to enhance resilience. Strategic partnerships and outcome-oriented commercial models will further differentiate suppliers that can deliver consistent quality, rapid response, and aligned sustainability credentials. The overall conclusion is that supply continuity, safety, and cost-effectiveness are achievable when companies integrate segmentation-aware strategies, regional sensitivity, and active risk management into procurement and operational planning.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Delivery Mode

  • 8.1. Cylinder Tube
  • 8.2. On Site Generation
  • 8.3. Pipeline

9. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Gas Type

  • 9.1. Argon
  • 9.2. Carbon Dioxide
  • 9.3. Nitrogen
  • 9.4. Oxygen

10. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Pressure Class

  • 10.1. High Pressure
  • 10.2. Low Pressure

11. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by End Use

  • 11.1. Chemical Processing
  • 11.2. Electronics
  • 11.3. Food & Beverage
  • 11.4. Healthcare
  • 11.5. Metals
  • 11.6. Oil & Gas

12. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Gas Delivery Systems Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Gas Delivery Systems Market

16. China Gas Delivery Systems Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. Air Liquide S.A.
  • 17.6. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
  • 17.7. Chart Industries, Inc.
  • 17.8. Emerson Electric Co.
  • 17.9. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 17.10. Iwatani Corporation
  • 17.11. Linde plc
  • 17.12. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
  • 17.13. Messer Group GmbH
  • 17.14. Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation
  • 17.15. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • 17.16. Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDER TUBE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDER TUBE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CYLINDER TUBE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ON SITE GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ON SITE GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ON SITE GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ARGON, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ARGON, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ARGON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON DIOXIDE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON DIOXIDE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON DIOXIDE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY NITROGEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY NITROGEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY NITROGEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OXYGEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OXYGEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OXYGEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PRESSURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PRESSURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH PRESSURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW PRESSURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW PRESSURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW PRESSURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY METALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY METALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY METALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. AMERICAS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. AMERICAS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. NORTH AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. NORTH AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. NORTH AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. NORTH AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. LATIN AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. LATIN AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. LATIN AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. LATIN AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. LATIN AMERICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. EUROPE GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. MIDDLE EAST GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. MIDDLE EAST GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AFRICA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GCC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPEAN UNION GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPEAN UNION GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. BRICS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. BRICS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. BRICS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. G7 GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. G7 GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. G7 GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. G7 GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NATO GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. NATO GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. NATO GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. NATO GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. NATO GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. UNITED STATES GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY DELIVERY MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY GAS TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE CLASS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. CHINA GAS DELIVERY SYSTEMS MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)