查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
2011712

互联农业市场：按组件、模组、部署、应用和最终用户划分－2026-2032年全球市场预测

Connected Agriculture Market by Component, Module, Deployment, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 180 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，互联农业市场价值将达到 63.2 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 73.3 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 187.6 亿美元，年复合成长率为 16.79%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 63.2亿美元
预计年份：2026年 73.3亿美元
预测年份 2032 187.6亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 16.79%

为互联农业技术、制度促进者和商业化途径建构简洁的基础框架，进而影响农场层面的决策。

互联农业正逐渐成为现代食品体系的基石，它能够实现从农场到餐桌整个流程的精准化、可追溯性和韧性。本文整合了定义该领域的核心技术、营运转型和相关人员，为更深入的策略分析奠定了基础。

感测器技术、资料管治和基于结果的经营模式的快速发展如何重塑整个农业食品价值链的部署模式和价值获取方式。

互联农业的格局正在经历一场变革性的转变，重新定义了整个农业食品生态系统的运作规范、技术应用模式和价值创造方式。感测器小型化和低功耗连接技术的快速发展，使得对土壤、天气和作物状况的监测更加精细化；同时，机器学习和边缘分析技术的进步，也为田间作业提供了更有价值的洞察。

评估策略供应链和商业性应对措施，以应对精密农业组件和整合系统关税带来的成本压力。

到2025年，关税政策调整的累积影响正对供应商的策略、采购政策以及互联农业解决方案的设计产生重大影响。对感测器、精密驱动硬体和通讯模组等进口零件征收的关税推高了许多整合系统的单位成本，加速了企业考虑替代筹资策略和本地组装方案的进程。

从综合细分的观点，重点介绍元件、模组、部署选项、应用程式和最终用户如何创造独特的部署路径和价值提案。

关键的细分洞察揭示了哪些领域的采用正在加速，哪些产品和服务引起了不同客户群的共鸣，以及产品和服务架构应如何演进以满足多样化的需求。基于组件的分析清楚地展现了服务和解决方案之间的差异。服务包括咨询服务、託管服务、专业服务、支援和维护以及培训和教育。而解决方案则包括作物监测、农业机械管理、温室自动化、灌溉管理、牲畜监测以及气象和土壤监测。这种二元性凸显了服务提供者需要在深厚的专业知识和扩充性的产品化能力之间取得平衡，以满足初始部署和持续营运的需求。

影响技术采用的美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域趋势，以及战略市场进入考量。

区域趋势在互联农业的采纳轨迹、投资重点和伙伴关係模式中发挥核心作用。在美洲，私营部门对大规模商业农场和精密农业工具的大力投资正在推动其普及，为垂直整合解决方案和资金支持的采纳模式创造了有利环境。放眼东方，在欧洲、中东和非洲地区，监管驱动因素和永续性义务交织在一起，加速了感测器应用、可追溯性计划以及公共机构与私营创新者之间的合作研究伙伴关係。

整合产品和服务策略、策略伙伴关係和人才优化如何决定互联农业供应商的竞争优势。

互联农业领域的企业正在整合其硬体、软体和服务方面的能力，以确保持续的收入并深化客户关係。主要企业专注于开发整合平台，同时建立专业服务的管理型服务交付体系，以确保成功部署和长期价值实现。与通讯业者、感测器製造商和农业合作社建立策略伙伴关係十分普遍，从而能够利用现有的分销网络和当地农业专业知识来提供解决方案。

产业领导者应采取切实可行的策略行动，以加快采用速度、降低供应链风险，并使经营模式与可衡量的农业成果保持一致。

产业领导者应优先考虑能够加速产品大规模普及并同时保持长期选择和韧性的措施。首先，投资于模组化产品架构和开放式整合能力，以降低客户门槛，并提供灵活的资金筹措和升级方案。其次，拓展以服务主导的产品，包括培训和託管服务，以提高产品普及率，并将一次性硬体销售转化为持续的收入关係。

我们透过高度透明的混合方法研究途径，结合相关人员访谈、有针对性的文献综述和基于细分的三角测量，获得了切实可行的见解。

本执行摘要的调查方法旨在透过结合一手定性研究和严谨的二手研究，确保提供平衡且切实可行的见解。定性资讯是透过对包括技术提供者、农民、政策顾问和研究机构在内的众多相关人员进行结构化访谈收集的，从而了解他们对推广障碍、营运重点和未来发展方向的不同观点。

强调技术整合、政策参与和实地检验之间必要协调的综合策略观点，以实现长期价值。

总之，我们总结了本执行摘要中的关键见解，并为互联农业生态系统中的相关人员提供了策略重点的简要展望。儘管技术和经营模式的创新正在融合，使精密农业更易于获取且更具营运效益，但其普及应用取决于供应商能否以经济实惠、互通性且经过实际验证的方式整合硬体、软体和服务。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席体验长观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 互联农业市场：依组成部分划分

  • 服务
    • 咨询服务
    • 託管服务
    • 专业服务
    • 支援与维护
    • 培训和教育
  • 解决方案
    • 作物监测
    • 农业机械管理
    • 温室自动化
    • 灌溉管理
    • 牲畜监测
    • 天气和土壤监测

第九章：模组化互联农业市场

  • 应用实现
  • 连线管理
  • 设备管理

第十章 互联农业市场：依部署方式

  • 云
  • 现场

第十一章 互联农业市场：依应用领域划分

  • 生产过程中的计划与管理
  • 后製规划与管理
  • 生产前期规划与管理

第十二章 互联农业市场：依最终用户划分

  • 农民
  • 政府机构
  • 研究机构

第十三章 互联农业市场：依地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章 互联农业市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十五章 互联农业市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国互联农业市场

第十七章：中国的互联农业市场

第十八章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Accenture PLC
  • Ag Leader Technology
  • AGCO Corporation
  • AGRIVI Ltd.
  • BASF SE
  • Bayer AG
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • CNH Industrial NV
  • Conservis By Traction Ag Inc.
  • Corteva, Inc.
  • Cropin Technology Solutions Private Limited
  • Croptracker, Inc.
  • Deere & Company
  • Farmers Edge Inc.
  • Gamaya
  • Granular Inc.
  • Hexagon AB
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • Kubota Corporation
  • Lindsay Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • SAP SE
  • Shivrai Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
  • SMAG by InVivo
  • Syngenta AG
  • Taranis
  • TELUS Communications Inc.
  • Tend.com
  • Topcon Corporation
  • Yara International ASA
Product Code: MRR-430D3EB72123

The Connected Agriculture Market was valued at USD 6.32 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 7.33 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 16.79%, reaching USD 18.76 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 6.32 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 7.33 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 18.76 billion
CAGR (%) 16.79%

Concise foundational framing of connected agriculture technologies, institutional drivers, and commercialization pathways shaping farm-level decision-making

Connected agriculture is emerging as a foundational pillar of modern food systems, enabling precision, traceability, and resilience across the farm-to-fork continuum. This introduction synthesizes the core technologies, operational shifts, and stakeholder motivations that define the sector, establishing a context for deeper strategic analysis.

The narrative begins with the technological building blocks that underpin connected agriculture, including networks of sensors, edge and cloud computing, analytics, and integrated farm management platforms. These elements combine to deliver incremental and systemic value: improved input efficiency, reduced waste, and enhanced decision-making at the field level. Equally important are the institutional drivers - regulatory pressures for sustainability, evolving consumer expectations for provenance and quality, and the operational imperative to manage risk in a more variable climate environment.

Transitioning from concept to adoption, the introduction emphasizes how commercial models are evolving to link hardware, software, and services into bundled offerings that lower adoption barriers for growers. The section frames the remainder of the executive summary by highlighting where strategic value is created, which stakeholders capture that value, and how interoperability, standards, and data governance will influence long-term success. By offering this orientation, the content prepares readers to evaluate subsequent discussions on market dynamics, competitive positioning, and actionable recommendations.

How rapid sensor innovation, data governance, and outcome-based commercial models are reshaping adoption patterns and value capture across the agrifood value chain

The landscape of connected agriculture is undergoing transformative shifts that are redefining operational norms, technology adoption patterns, and value capture across the agrifood ecosystem. Rapid advancements in sensor miniaturization and low-power connectivity are enabling more granular monitoring of soil, weather, and crop status, while improvements in machine learning and edge analytics are moving meaningful intelligence closer to the point of action.

Simultaneously, business models are shifting from one-time technology sales toward subscription and outcome-based agreements that align vendor incentives with farm productivity and sustainability outcomes. This transition is encouraging long-term partnerships between technology providers and growers and is prompting investment in integration capabilities and service delivery. Governance and interoperability are also in focus; increasing attention to data standards and secure data exchange is creating new expectations around data ownership, privacy, and the ethical use of farm-level information.

As these developments converge, stakeholders must reassess strategic priorities: technology selection criteria, supply chain partnerships, talent and capability development, and regulatory engagement. The result is a more interconnected, data-driven agricultural paradigm where differentiated value will accrue to organizations that can combine robust sensing, practical analytics, and scalable service models while demonstrating measurable agricultural and environmental benefits.

Assessing the strategic supply chain and commercial responses to tariff-driven cost pressures on precision agriculture components and integrated systems

The cumulative impact of tariff policy adjustments through 2025 has materially influenced supplier strategies, procurement choices, and the design of connected agriculture solutions. Tariffs on imported components such as sensors, precision-actuation hardware, and communications modules have increased unit costs for many integrated systems, thereby accelerating evaluation of alternative sourcing strategies and local assembly options.

In response, manufacturers and solution providers have pursued a range of mitigations. Some organizations have accelerated supplier diversification to include regional vendors with reduced tariff exposure, while others have altered bill-of-materials designs to rely more heavily on domestically sourced components. Additionally, there has been a discernible shift toward modular architectures that allow incremental upgrades without full-system replacements, helping to manage capital intensity for end users.

These dynamics have also affected go-to-market approaches. Providers are emphasizing financing, managed services, and software-centric revenue streams to offset higher hardware costs and to preserve adoption momentum. From a policy engagement perspective, stakeholders are increasing advocacy efforts centered on harmonized standards and tariff exemptions for critical agricultural technologies. Collectively, these responses demonstrate an adaptive ecosystem that is rebalancing supply chains and business models to preserve innovation diffusion despite the headwinds created by tariff measures.

Integrated segmentation perspectives highlighting how components, modules, deployment choices, applications, and end users create distinct adoption pathways and value propositions

Key segmentation insights reveal where adoption accelerates, which offerings resonate with different customer cohorts, and how product and service architectures must evolve to meet diverse needs. Analysis by component shows a differentiated landscape between Services and Solutions: Services encompass consulting services, managed services, professional services, support and maintenance, and training and education, while Solutions cover crop monitoring, farming machinery management, greenhouse automation, irrigation management, livestock monitoring, and weather and soil monitoring. This duality underscores that providers must balance deep domain expertise with scalable, productized capabilities to serve both implementation and ongoing operational needs.

When examining the technology stack through module segmentation, the market divides across application enablement, connectivity management, and device management, each demanding distinct engineering priorities and go-to-market narratives. Deployment preferences further segment the landscape into cloud and on-premises options, reflecting variability in connectivity, security posture, and customer willingness to trust off-site data stewardship. Application-based segmentation isolates pre-production planning and management, in-production planning and management, and post-production planning and management, indicating that end-to-end workflows require integrated solutions that span the crop lifecycle.

Finally, end user segmentation identifies farmers, government agencies, and research institutions as primary adopter groups, each with unique procurement drivers, performance metrics, and support expectations. Together, these segmentation lenses suggest that successful strategies will be those that tailor bundles of technology, services, and deployment models to clearly defined user journeys while maintaining interoperability to enable cross-segment scalability.

Comparative regional dynamics and strategic go-to-market considerations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence technology adoption

Regional dynamics are central to shaping adoption trajectories, investment priorities, and partnership models within connected agriculture. In the Americas, adoption is being driven by large-scale commercial farms and strong private-sector investment into precision farming tools, creating a fertile environment for vertically integrated solutions and finance-backed deployment models. Transitioning eastward, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of regulatory drivers and sustainability mandates that are encouraging sensor deployment, traceability initiatives, and collaborative research partnerships between public institutions and private innovators.

Asia-Pacific exhibits a mix of high-technology adoption in industrialized markets and leapfrogging opportunities in emerging economies where mobile-first solutions and low-cost sensor networks can scale rapidly. These regional differences imply varying priorities for solution architecture, pricing, and local partnerships. For example, regions with fragmented smallholder landscapes will prioritize lightweight, low-cost solutions and strong extension services, whereas regions with large commercial farms will value integrated machinery management, high-bandwidth connectivity, and advanced analytics.

Consequently, vendors must adopt differentiated regional go-to-market playbooks that account for regulatory environments, infrastructure constraints, and customer sophistication. Cross-regional learners can export proven service models while adapting technology to local agronomic and economic contexts, thereby accelerating adoption while managing implementation risk.

How integrated product-service strategies, strategic partnerships, and talent orchestration are defining competitive advantage among connected agriculture providers

Companies operating in connected agriculture are consolidating capabilities across hardware, software, and services to capture recurring revenue and to deepen customer relationships. Leading organizations tend to focus on integrated platform development while simultaneously building out professional services and managed service offerings to ensure successful deployment and long-term value realization. Strategic partnerships with telecom operators, sensor manufacturers, and agricultural cooperatives are common, enabling solutions that leverage existing distribution networks and local agronomic expertise.

Product roadmaps emphasize modularity and open APIs to facilitate interoperability with third-party tools and to reduce integration friction for large enterprise customers. In parallel, service portfolios are expanding to include advisory services, agronomic analytics, and outcome-based contracts that align vendor compensation with measured agronomic improvements. Talent strategies reflect growing demand for interdisciplinary teams that combine agronomy, data science, and systems engineering, along with customer success functions focused on farmer adoption and retention.

From a competitive standpoint, market leaders differentiate through validated field performance, robust assurance programs, and transparent data governance. Emerging challengers commonly focus on niche segments - for example, specialized sensors or localized advisory platforms - and can rapidly gain footholds by addressing specific pain points. Overall, the firm-level insight is that sustained advantage will accrue to organizations that execute integrated product-service strategies while maintaining flexibility to adapt to regional requirements and evolving regulatory expectations.

Practical strategic actions that industry leaders should implement to accelerate adoption, de-risk supply chains, and align commercial models with measurable farm outcomes

Leaders in the industry should prioritize actions that accelerate meaningful adoption while protecting long-term optionality and resilience. First, invest in modular product architectures and open integration capabilities to reduce customer friction and to enable flexible financing and upgrade paths. Second, expand service-led offerings-including training and managed services-to increase adoption velocity and to transform one-time hardware sales into recurring revenue relationships.

Third, diversify supply chains to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten lead times for critical components; this should include regional assembly capabilities and strategic supplier partnerships. Fourth, engage proactively with policymakers, standards bodies, and industry consortia to shape favorable regulatory outcomes and to advocate for standards that enable secure data exchange. Fifth, build interdisciplinary teams that combine agronomy, data science, and field engineering, and invest in on-farm demonstrations and proof-of-value pilots to establish credibility and measurable outcomes.

Finally, adopt customer-centric pricing and contracting models that align incentives, such as outcome-based contracts or usage-based subscriptions, and ensure robust data governance practices that address privacy, security, and ownership concerns. Implementing these actions will increase adoption resilience, accelerate time-to-value for end users, and position organizations to capture more of the long-term value created by connected agriculture.

Transparent mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, targeted literature review, and segmentation-based triangulation to produce actionable findings

The research methodology underpinning this executive summary is designed to combine primary qualitative insight with rigorous secondary synthesis to ensure balanced, actionable findings. Qualitative inputs were gathered through structured interviews with a cross-section of stakeholders, including technology providers, agricultural practitioners, policy advisors, and research institutions, to capture diverse perspectives on adoption barriers, operational priorities, and future trajectories.

Secondary research comprised a targeted review of technical literature, regulatory announcements, and industry reports to contextualize primary insights and to trace technology and policy trends. The analysis applied a segmentation framework to map capabilities across components, modules, deployment models, applications, and end-user types, enabling granular interpretation of where value is created and where strategic focus should be concentrated. Triangulation techniques were used to validate divergent viewpoints, and scenario-based reasoning helped explore how policy shifts and supply-chain disruptions could influence strategic choices.

Throughout the methodology, attention was paid to transparency of assumptions and to documenting sources of uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis and corroborative interviews were employed to reduce bias and to highlight areas where additional field validation would be valuable. This methodological approach supports robust, practitioner-oriented conclusions and recommendations.

Consolidated strategic perspective emphasizing the necessary alignment of technology integration, policy engagement, and field-level validation to realize long-term value

The conclusion synthesizes the executive summary's principal insights and offers a concise perspective on strategic priorities for stakeholders across the connected agriculture ecosystem. Technology and business-model innovation are converging to make precision agriculture more accessible and operationally impactful, yet adoption will depend on the ability of providers to integrate hardware, software, and services in ways that are affordable, interoperable, and demonstrably beneficial under real-world conditions.

Policy and supply-chain dynamics are significant modifiers of the adoption curve; proactive strategies that address tariff exposure, local sourcing, and regulatory engagement are essential to sustain momentum. Equally, regional variation in farm structure and infrastructure will require tailored approaches rather than a one-size-fits-all playbook. Providers that combine modular product design, flexible commercial models, and a strong emphasis on field-level validation will be best positioned to capture long-term value.

In closing, connected agriculture represents a pragmatic path to improve productivity, sustainability, and resilience, but realizing that potential will require disciplined execution, collaborative partnerships, and continued emphasis on measurable outcomes. Stakeholders should prioritize interventions that reduce adoption friction, protect economic viability for growers, and ensure that data and technology deployments deliver verifiable agronomic and environmental benefits.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Connected Agriculture Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Services
    • 8.1.1. Consulting Services
    • 8.1.2. Managed Services
    • 8.1.3. Professional Services
    • 8.1.4. Support & Maintenance
    • 8.1.5. Training & Education
  • 8.2. Solutions
    • 8.2.1. Crop Monitoring
    • 8.2.2. Farming Machinery Management
    • 8.2.3. Greenhouse Automation
    • 8.2.4. Irrigation Management
    • 8.2.5. Livestock Monitoring
    • 8.2.6. Weather & Soil Monitoring

9. Connected Agriculture Market, by Module

  • 9.1. Application Enablement
  • 9.2. Connectivity Management
  • 9.3. Device Management

10. Connected Agriculture Market, by Deployment

  • 10.1. Cloud
  • 10.2. On-Premises

11. Connected Agriculture Market, by Application

  • 11.1. In-Production Planning & Management
  • 11.2. Post-Production Planning & Management
  • 11.3. Pre-Production Planning & Management

12. Connected Agriculture Market, by End User

  • 12.1. Farmers
  • 12.2. Government Agencies
  • 12.3. Research Institutions

13. Connected Agriculture Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Connected Agriculture Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Connected Agriculture Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Connected Agriculture Market

17. China Connected Agriculture Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Accenture PLC
  • 18.6. Ag Leader Technology
  • 18.7. AGCO Corporation
  • 18.8. AGRIVI Ltd.
  • 18.9. BASF SE
  • 18.10. Bayer AG
  • 18.11. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 18.12. CNH Industrial N.V.
  • 18.13. Conservis By Traction Ag Inc.
  • 18.14. Corteva, Inc.
  • 18.15. Cropin Technology Solutions Private Limited
  • 18.16. Croptracker, Inc.
  • 18.17. Deere & Company
  • 18.18. Farmers Edge Inc.
  • 18.19. Gamaya
  • 18.20. Granular Inc.
  • 18.21. Hexagon AB
  • 18.22. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 18.23. Kubota Corporation
  • 18.24. Lindsay Corporation
  • 18.25. Microsoft Corporation
  • 18.26. Oracle Corporation
  • 18.27. Robert Bosch GmbH
  • 18.28. SAP SE
  • 18.29. Shivrai Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
  • 18.30. SMAG by InVivo
  • 18.31. Syngenta AG
  • 18.32. Taranis
  • 18.33. TELUS Communications Inc.
  • 18.34. Tend.com
  • 18.35. Topcon Corporation
  • 18.36. Yara International ASA

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONSULTING SERVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONSULTING SERVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONSULTING SERVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MANAGED SERVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MANAGED SERVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MANAGED SERVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY TRAINING & EDUCATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY TRAINING & EDUCATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY TRAINING & EDUCATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CROP MONITORING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CROP MONITORING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CROP MONITORING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMING MACHINERY MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMING MACHINERY MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMING MACHINERY MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSE AUTOMATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSE AUTOMATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSE AUTOMATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY LIVESTOCK MONITORING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY LIVESTOCK MONITORING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY LIVESTOCK MONITORING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY WEATHER & SOIL MONITORING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY WEATHER & SOIL MONITORING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY WEATHER & SOIL MONITORING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION ENABLEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION ENABLEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION ENABLEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONNECTIVITY MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONNECTIVITY MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CONNECTIVITY MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IN-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IN-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY IN-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY POST-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY POST-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY POST-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PRE-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PRE-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY PRE-PRODUCTION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY FARMERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. AMERICAS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASIA-PACIFIC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASEAN CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GCC CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. EUROPEAN UNION CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. BRICS CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. G7 CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. NATO CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. GLOBAL CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. UNITED STATES CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY MODULE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. CHINA CONNECTED AGRICULTURE MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)