![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1921889
锂离子电池用锰铁磷酸盐(LMFP)专利模式分析(2026)LMFP for Li-ion Batteries Patent Landscape Analysis 2026 |
||||||
全球对高效能环保储能解决方案的需求快速成长,这主要得益于电动车(EV)和大规模储能系统(ESS)的广泛应用,使得锂离子电池(LIB)先进正极材料的研发成为关注的焦点。橄榄石结构的磷酸铁锂(LFP)因其高安全性、稳定性、低成本和环境友善性而广受认可,但其相对较低的工作电压(通常约为3.4 V/Li/Li+)和有限的能量密度使其无法满足高性能应用日益增长的需求。为了因应这项挑战,锰铁磷酸盐锂(LMFP)应运而生,它以锰部分取代橄榄石结构中的铁,成为极具潜力的替代方案。这种复合材料继承了磷酸铁锂(LFP)的高热稳定性和成本效益,同时利用锰的高氧化还原电位,使其能量密度比LFP增加了10-20%。儘管有这些优势,锂金属磷酸铁锂(LMFP)也面临着自身的挑战。这些挑战包括电子和离子电导率低、锂离子扩散缓慢、锰的浸出以及与Mn³⁺的Jahn-Teller效应相关的容量衰减。过去十年,这促使人们开展了广泛的研究,并获得了强劲的专利活动的支持。

自2023年以来,中国企业已成为LMFP专利领域的主要新进者。自2023年以来,已有超过410家新的智慧财产权公司进入LMFP专利领域,其中约80%为中国公司。超过20家新进者为非中国新创企业。中国公司主要为材料和电池製造商,其他亚洲公司则主要为研发机构和材料製造商。来自美国的新进业者既包括新创企业,也包括成熟公司。其他非亚洲公司主要由研发机构、电池製造商和材料供应商组成。
产业:宁德时代、LG化学/LG能源解决方案、三星、Dynanonic、比亚迪、EVE Energy、村田製作所/索尼、ATL、国轩高科动力能源/Gotion、SVOLT、丰田、太平洋水泥、东芝、住友化学/田中化学、天赐科技、远景能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC、Global能源/AESC Graphene、COSMX/COSLIGHT、住友金属矿业、Sunwoda、通用汽车、荣贝科技、魁北克水电、Reliance New Energy/Lithium Werks、Epsilon Carbon/庄信万丰等。
研发机构:SEL、九州大学、产业技术综合研究所 (AIST)、东京都立大学、中南大学、物理研究所、清华大学、北京理工大学、汉阳大学、蔚山科学技术大学 (UNIST)、韩国科学技术院 (KAIST)、俄罗斯科学技术研究院 (RIST)、化学工程研究所 (KERI)、韩国科学技术院 (KAIST)、俄罗斯科学技术研究院 (RIST)、化学工程研究所 (KERI)、法国原子能委员会 (CEA) (CNRS)、弗劳恩霍夫研究所、蒙特娄大学、芝加哥大学、密西根大学、洛克希德马丁/UT-巴特尔研究所等。
本报告对与锂锰铁磷酸盐 (LMFP) 相关的专利格局进行了全面分析,包括一个包含超过 7,800 项专利的 Excel 资料库,以及全球专利趋势和主要公司专利组合的资讯。
各细分市场简介
各国简介
各知识产权公司简介:知识产权动态和专利活动水平、地理和技术覆盖范围、知识产权优势以及提升潜力。
The burgeoning global demand for highly efficient and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions, driven primarily by the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and large-scale energy storage systems (ESS), has made the development of advanced lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathode materials a critical focus. While the olivine-structured lithium iron phosphate (LFP) is widely valued for its high safety, stability, low cost, and environmental friendliness, its relatively low operating voltage, typically around 3.4 V (vs. Li/Li+), limits its energy density and falls short of the increasing requirements for high-performance applications. Lithium manganese iron phosphate (LMFP), developed by partially substituting iron with manganese in the olivine structure, has emerged as a promising alternative. This composition incorporates the high thermal stability and cost-effectiveness of LFP while leveraging the higher redox potential of manganese, resulting in a 10% to 20% higher energy density than LFP. Despite these advantages, LMFP faces intrinsic challenges notably poor electronic and ionic conductivity, sluggish lithium-ion diffusion kinetics, manganese dissolution issues, and capacity degradation related to the Jahn-Teller effect induced by Mn3+. Consequently, extensive research, supported by robust patent activity, has been performed for the last ten years.
In this context, the present report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the patent landscape related to the lithium manganese iron phosphate, from materials to battery cells. Knowmade's analysts have selected and analyzed more than 7,800+ patent families (inventions) related to LMFP.
The general objectives of the present report are:
These strategic insights will support R&D, investment, and policy decisions in the evolving field of Li-ion battery.
IP competition analysis should reflect the vision of players with a strategy to enter and develop their business in the LMFP Li-ion battery market. In this report, Knowmade's analysts provide a comprehensive overview of the competitive IP landscape and latest technological developments in this field. The report identifies the IP leaders, most active patent applicants, and new entrants in the IP landscape. It also sheds light on under-the-radar companies and new players in this field. The report covers IP dynamics and key trends in terms of patents applications, patent assignees, filing countries, and technological segment of interest (precursors, cathode active materials, cathode, battery cells, etc.). Dedicated sections of the report focus on the patent portfolios of key players from various countries.
Since 2023, Chinese entities have established themselves as dominant newcomers in the LMFP patent landscape. Over 410 new IP players have entered the LMFP patent landscape since 2023, with around 80% coming from China. More than 20 newcomers are non-Chinese start-ups. The main Chinese entrants are material and battery manufacturers, while other Asian newcomers are primarily R&D institutes and material producers. American newcomers include both start-ups and established companies, whereas other non-Asian entrants consist mainly of R&D organizations, battery manufacturers, and material suppliers. Dedicated sections of the report focus on the patent portfolios of IP new entrants from various countries.
All patents selected for this study have been categorized by supply chain segment (precursor, cathode material, cathode, battery cells).
For each supply chain segment, this report includes a time-evolution of patent applications, main and key patent assignees, and a description of key and recently patented technologies. An understanding of the current technical challenges addressed in the patents is also presented.
This report also includes an extensive Excel database with all patents analyzed in this study, including patent information (numbers, dates, assignees, title, abstract, etc.), hyperlinks to an updated online database (original documents, legal status, etc.), and supply chain segments (precursors, cathode active materials, cathodes, battery cells).
INDUSTRIALS: CATL, LG Chem/LG Energy Solutions, Samsung, Dynanonic, BYD, EVE Energy, Murata/Sony, ATL, Guoxuan High Tech Power Energy/Gotion, SVOLT, Toyota, Taiheiyo Cement, Toshiba, Sumitomo Chemical/Tanaka Chemical, Tinci Materials Technology, Envision/AESC, Global Graphene, COSMX/COSLIGHT, Sumitomo Metal Mining, Sunwoda, General Motors, Rongbay Technology, HydroQuebec, Reliance New Energy/Lithium Werks, Epsilon Carbon/Johnson Matthey and more.
R&D LABORATORIES: SEL, Kyushu University, AIST, Tokyo Metropolotan University, Central South University, Institute of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing Institute of Technology, Hanyang University, UNIST, KAIST, RIST, KERI, CEA, CNRS, Fraunhofer, Universite de Montreal, University of Chicago, University of Michigan, Lockheed Martin/UT-Battelle and more.
For each segment:
For each country:
Fore each IP players: IP dynamics and level of patent activity, geographical & technical coverage, IP strengths, and potential for reinforcement.