查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1787901

全球硝化抑制剂及尿素酶抑制剂市场分析及预测（至2032年）：依产品类型、营养类型、作物类型、施用方法、通路、最终用户及地区划分

Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Product Type, Nutrient Type, Crop Type, Application Method, Distribution Channel, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场规模预计在 2025 年达到 33.6 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 55.1 亿美元，预测期内的复合年增长率为 7.3%。硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂是用于农业的化合物，透过减缓土壤中氮的转化来提高氮的利用效率。硝化抑制剂减缓铵转化为硝酸盐的速度，从而减少淋溶和氧化亚氮的排放。尿素酶抑制剂可防止尿素快速水解为氨，从而最大限度地减少氮的挥发损失。这些抑制剂透过提高肥料效力和最大限度地减少环境影响来支持永续农业。

根据美国农业部预测，2022年加拿大小麦产量将成长3%。

对永续农业的需求不断增加

硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂在减少肥料氮损失、改善土壤健康和减少环境污染方面发挥着至关重要的作用。农民正在采用这些抑制剂作为提高氮利用效率并抑制温室气体排放的工具。随着粮食需求的增加和可耕地面积的减少，永续性对于维持长期生产力至关重要。这些抑制剂还能满足日益增长的监管压力，以减少硝酸盐淋失和氨挥发。随着永续农业的发展势头强劲，市场需求预计将大幅成长。

认知和采用有限

许多农民对这些技术、其优势以及如何应用这些技术缺乏足够的了解。错误的资讯、有限的推广服务管道以及对现代农业机会的了解有限，阻碍了这些技术的采用。小农户往往优先考虑短期产量，而非长期的土壤健康和氮肥效率，这使得他们不愿意采用优质添加剂。语言障碍、政府宣传不足以及缺乏有针对性的教育计画进一步加剧了这个问题。这些知识差距降低了市场渗透率，并减缓了永续肥料管理解决方案的推广。

与智慧灌溉系统集成

智慧系统可以定时释放养分，减少浪费，并使施肥与作物需求同步。将这些技术与抑制剂结合，可以增强氮素保留，提高植物吸收效率。先进的感测器技术可以即时监测土壤氮素状况，从而实现因地制宜的抑制剂施用。这不仅优化了资源利用率和产量，还最大限度地减少了对环境的影响。随着气候适应农业成为优先事项，这种技术主导的协同效应有望彻底改变养分管理。

肥料价格波动

全球能源价格、原料短缺和地缘政治紧张局势导致氮肥成本波动，影响农民的购买决策。当肥料价格上涨时，农民可能会减少整体投入，包括抑制剂等添加剂的使用。相反，肥料价格低迷时期会减少对增效产品的需求。这种价格波动带来了不确定性，并阻碍了对先进养分管理解决方案的长期投资。此外，新兴国家对价格敏感的市场尤其脆弱，限制了全球农业领域对抑制剂的稳定需求和成长潜力。

COVID-19的影响：

新冠疫情扰乱了全球农业供应链，减缓了肥料和抑制剂的生产和分销。劳动力短缺和停工影响了田间试验，并推迟了监管核准。然而，这场危机也增强了人们对韧性农业的兴趣，并凸显了永续农业实践的重要性。硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂作为在资源受限的情况下优化产量的工具而广受欢迎。疫情后的復苏使人们对土壤健康和投入效率的兴趣日益浓厚，这有利于抑制剂的推广应用。

硝化抑制剂市场预计将在预测期内占据最大份额

预计硝化抑制剂细分市场将在预测期内占据最大市场占有率，这得益于永续农业需求的不断增长以及氮肥利用效率的提高。这些产品可减少硝酸盐淋失和氧化亚氮排放，有助于满足环境法规和气候目标。肥料成本的上涨以及作物产量最大化的需求进一步推动了这些产品的普及。政府的支持性政策以及农民对土壤健康和养分管理意识的不断提升也推动了市场的成长。

预计叶面喷布领域在预测期内的复合年增长率最高。

叶面喷布由于其简单易行、对快速生长、营养密集型作物有效，预计将在预测期内呈现最高增长率。叶面喷布能够在关键生长阶段精准输送养分，并迅速被叶片吸收。改良的配方可提高叶片附着力，并最大限度地减少炎热气候下的损失。这种方法的适应性和效率是推动叶面喷布抑制剂应用扩大的关键因素，尤其是在高价值园艺作物中。

占比最高的地区：

由于粮食生产需求不断增长以及高效施肥政策的支持，预计亚太地区将在预测期内占据最大市场占有率。印度和中国等国家正在优先考虑环保耕作方法，以减少氮损失并提高农业产量。人们对土壤侵蚀和水污染等环境问题的认识不断提高，使得抑制剂更具吸引力。该地区农业技术的创新和强大的研发投入正在推动全部区域的市场成长。

复合年增长率最高的地区：

受不断加强的环境法规、先进的精密农业实践以及强有力的科研倡议的推动，北美地区预计将在预测期内实现最高的复合年增长率。农民正在采用抑制剂来减少氮损失、提高肥料效率并遵守永续性标准。政府的激励措施以及农业技术公司与科学研究机构之间的合作正在进一步推动成长。人们对土壤健康和水资源保护意识的不断提高也推动了需求，使该地区成为永续养分管理的领导者。

免费客製化服务：

此报告的订阅者可以使用以下免费自订选项之一：

  • 公司简介
    • 对最多三家其他市场公司进行全面分析
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析（最多3家公司）
  • 区域细分
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家进行的市场估计、预测和复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 调查范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究材料
    • 主要研究资料
    • 次级研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 抑制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 产品分析
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方的议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（依产品类型）

  • 硝化抑制剂
    • 双氰胺（DCD）
    • 硝吡啶
    • DMPP（3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸酯）
  • 尿素酶抑制剂（UI）
    • N-（正丁基）硫代磷酰三胺
    • 苯肾上腺素磷脂酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂（PPD/PPDA）
    • N-(2-硝基苯基)磷三酰胺 (NPPT)
    • 对苯二酚
  • 其他产品类型

6. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（依营养素类型）

  • 氮
  • 氨
  • 硝酸盐
  • 尿素
  • 其他营养类型

7. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（依作物类型）

  • 粮食
    • 玉米
    • 小麦
    • 米
  • 油籽和豆类
    • 大豆
    • 菜籽
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他作物类型

8. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（依应用）

  • 施肥灌溉
  • 叶面喷布
  • 土壤应用
  • 涂层/颗粒应用
  • 其他用途

9. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（依分销管道）

  • 网路零售
  • 线下零售

第十章全球硝化和尿素酶抑制剂市场（按最终用户）

  • 农业部门
    • 农民
    • 农业相关企业
  • 非农业部门
    • 高尔夫球场和草坪管理
    • 园艺
    • 景观美化
  • 其他最终用户

11. 全球硝化抑制剂和尿素酶抑制剂市场（按地区）

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 其他南美
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十二章 重大进展

  • 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
  • 收购与合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十三章：公司概况

  • BASF SE
  • The Dow Chemical Company
  • Solvay SA
  • Soilgenic Technologies LLC
  • SKW Piesteritz GmbH
  • SABIC Global Technologies BV
  • Rhodia Operations SASU
  • Nico Orgo Manures
  • National Fertilizers Limited
  • Koch Agronomic Services LLC
  • IFFCO
  • Evonik Industries
  • EuroChem Agro GmbH
  • DowDuPont
  • Corteva Agriscience
  • Compo Expert GmbH
  • Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
  • RainAg
Product Code: SMRC30166

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market is accounted for $3.36 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $5.51 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 7.3% during the forecast period. Nitrification and urease inhibitors are chemical compounds used in agriculture to enhance nitrogen use efficiency by slowing down nitrogen transformations in soil. Nitrification inhibitors delay the conversion of ammonium to nitrate, reducing leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Urease inhibitors prevent the rapid hydrolysis of urea into ammonia, minimizing nitrogen losses through volatilization. These inhibitors support sustainable farming by improving fertilizer effectiveness and minimizing environmental impact.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, in 2022, wheat production in Canada is projected to grow by 3%.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Rising demand for sustainable agriculture

Nitrification and urease inhibitors play a vital role by minimizing nitrogen losses from fertilizers, improving soil health, and reducing environmental pollution. Farmers are embracing these inhibitors as tools to enhance nitrogen use efficiency while curbing greenhouse gas emissions. With rising food demand and decreasing arable land, sustainability has become essential for long-term productivity. These inhibitors also align with growing regulatory pressures to reduce nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilization. As sustainable agriculture gains momentum, their market demand is expected to surge significantly.

Restraint:

Limited awareness and adoption

Many farmers lack adequate knowledge about these technologies, their benefits, and application methods. Misinformation, limited access to extension services, and low exposure to modern agricultural practices hinder acceptance. Smallholder farmers often prioritize immediate yield returns over long-term soil health or nitrogen efficiency, leading to resistance toward adopting premium additives. Moreover, language barriers, insufficient government outreach, and lack of targeted educational programs further exacerbate the problem. This knowledge gap reduces market penetration and delays the widespread adoption of sustainable fertilizer management solutions.

Opportunity:

Integration with smart irrigation systems

Smart systems enable timed nutrient release, reducing wastage and synchronizing fertilizer applications with crop needs. Coupling these technologies with inhibitors amplifies nitrogen retention and boosts plant uptake efficiency. Advanced sensor technologies allow real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen status, enabling site-specific application of inhibitors. This minimizes environmental impact while optimizing resource use and yields. As climate-resilient farming becomes a priority, this tech-driven synergy is poised to transform nutrient management.

Threat:

Volatile fertilizer prices

Fluctuations in the cost of nitrogen-based fertilizers driven by global energy prices, raw material shortages, and geopolitical tensions affect farmers' purchasing decisions. When fertilizer prices rise sharply, farmers may reduce overall input usage, including additives like inhibitors. Conversely, during periods of low fertilizer prices, the perceived need for efficiency-enhancing products diminishes. This price instability creates uncertainty, discouraging long-term investment in advanced nutrient management solutions. Additionally, price-sensitive markets in developing countries are especially vulnerable, limiting the consistent demand and growth potential of inhibitors across global agricultural sectors.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global agricultural supply chains, delaying production and distribution of fertilizers and inhibitors. Labor shortages and lockdowns affected field trials and slowed regulatory approvals. However, the crisis intensified focus on resilient farming and highlighted the importance of sustainable practices. Nitrification and urease inhibitors gained traction as tools to optimize yields under resource constraints. Post-pandemic recovery saw increased interest in soil health and input efficiency, benefiting inhibitor adoption.

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The nitrification inhibitors segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to the rising demand for sustainable agriculture and enhanced nitrogen use efficiency. These products help reduce nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions, aligning with environmental regulations and climate goals. Increasing fertilizer costs and the need to maximize crop yields further boost their adoption. Supportive government policies and growing awareness among farmers about soil health and nutrient management also propel market growth.

The foliar application segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the foliar application segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, owing to its simplicity and effectiveness for fast-growing, nutrient-intensive crops. It enables precise nutrient delivery during vital growth phases, with nutrients quickly absorbed through the leaves. Improved formulations enhance adherence to foliage and minimize losses in hot climates. This method's adaptability and higher efficiency, particularly in high-value horticultural crops, serve as major factors driving the growing use of foliar-applied inhibitors.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share, fuelled by escalating food production requirements and policy-driven support for efficient fertilizer use. Nations such as India and China are prioritizing eco-friendly farming practices to curb nitrogen loss and enhance agricultural output. Growing awareness of environmental issues like soil erosion and water contamination is increasing the appeal of inhibitors. Innovations in agri-tech and strong local research efforts are propelling the market's growth across the region.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, driven by rising environmental regulations, advanced precision farming practices, and strong research initiatives. Farmers are adopting inhibitors to reduce nitrogen loss, improve fertilizer efficiency, and comply with sustainability standards. Government incentives and collaborations between agritech firms and research institutions further support growth. Increasing awareness of soil health and water conservation also fuels demand, positioning the region as a leader in sustainable nutrient management.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market include BASF SE, The Dow Chemical Company, Solvay S.A, Soilgenic Technologies LLC, SKW Piesteritz GmbH, SABIC Global Technologies BV, Rhodia Operations SASU, Nico Orgo Manures, National Fertilizers Limited, Koch Agronomic Services LLC, IFFCO, Evonik Industries, EuroChem Agro GmbH, DowDuPont, Corteva Agriscience, Compo Expert GmbH, Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd., and RainAg.

Key Developments:

In July 2025, BASF and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. have signed a framework agreement for cathode active materials. Under the agreement, BASF will cooperate with CATL on a global scale. CATL has selected BASF as its important supplier. BASF will support CATL's global layout through its global production network.

In June 2025, Dow announces significant milestones to mark breakthrough innovation with INNATE(TM) TF 220 Resin to help enable the design for recyclability and high-performance BOPE films for flexible packaging. From material design to end-of-life solutions, Dow is collaborating with stakeholders across the packaging chain to create impactful, scalable solutions to today's sustainability challenges - transforming vision into commercial reality.

In April 2022, Koch Agronomic Services, LLC is excited to announce an agreement to collaborate with SVG Ventures|THRIVE, leveraging its Venture & Innovation Platform.This relationship aligns with Koch's focused efforts to expand its portfolio for growers around the globe to improve nutrient efficiency, utilization and uptake.

Product Types Covered:

  • Nitrification Inhibitors
  • Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
  • Other Product Types

Nutrient Types Covered:

  • Nitrogen
  • Ammonia
  • Nitrate
  • Urea
  • Other Nutrient Types

Crop Types Covered:

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & Pulses
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Other Crop Types

Application Methods Covered:

  • Fertigation
  • Foliar
  • Soil Application
  • Coating/Granular Application
  • Other Application Methods

Distribution Channels Covered:

  • Online Retail
  • Offline Retail

End Users Covered:

  • Agricultural Sector
  • Non-Agricultural Sector
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Product Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Product Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Nitrification Inhibitors
    • 5.2.1 Dicyandiamide (DCD)
    • 5.2.2 Nitrapyrin
    • 5.2.3 DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate)
  • 5.3 Urease Inhibitors (UIs)
    • 5.3.1 N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide
    • 5.3.2 Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA)
    • 5.3.3 N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT)
    • 5.3.4 Hydroquinone
  • 5.4 Other Product Types

6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Nutrient Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Nitrogen
  • 6.3 Ammonia
  • 6.4 Nitrate
  • 6.5 Urea
  • 6.6 Other Nutrient Types

7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Crop Type

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Cereals & Grains
    • 7.2.1 Corn
    • 7.2.2 Wheat
    • 7.2.3 Rice
  • 7.3 Oilseeds & Pulses
    • 7.3.1 Soybean
    • 7.3.2 Canola
  • 7.4 Fruits & Vegetables
  • 7.5 Other Crop Types

8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Application Method

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Fertigation
  • 8.3 Foliar
  • 8.4 Soil Application
  • 8.5 Coating/Granular Application
  • 8.6 Other Application Methods

9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Distribution Channel

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Online Retail
  • 9.3 Offline Retail

10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By End User

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 Agricultural Sector
    • 10.2.1 Farmers
    • 10.2.2 Agribusiness Companies
  • 10.3 Non-Agricultural Sector
    • 10.3.1 Golf Courses & Turf Management
    • 10.3.2 Horticulture
    • 10.3.3 Landscaping
  • 10.4 Other End Users

11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market, By Geography

  • 11.1 Introduction
  • 11.2 North America
    • 11.2.1 US
    • 11.2.2 Canada
    • 11.2.3 Mexico
  • 11.3 Europe
    • 11.3.1 Germany
    • 11.3.2 UK
    • 11.3.3 Italy
    • 11.3.4 France
    • 11.3.5 Spain
    • 11.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 11.4 Asia Pacific
    • 11.4.1 Japan
    • 11.4.2 China
    • 11.4.3 India
    • 11.4.4 Australia
    • 11.4.5 New Zealand
    • 11.4.6 South Korea
    • 11.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 11.5 South America
    • 11.5.1 Argentina
    • 11.5.2 Brazil
    • 11.5.3 Chile
    • 11.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 11.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 11.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 11.6.2 UAE
    • 11.6.3 Qatar
    • 11.6.4 South Africa
    • 11.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

12 Key Developments

  • 12.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 12.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 12.3 New Product Launch
  • 12.4 Expansions
  • 12.5 Other Key Strategies

13 Company Profiling

  • 13.1 BASF SE
  • 13.2 The Dow Chemical Company
  • 13.3 Solvay S.A
  • 13.4 Soilgenic Technologies LLC
  • 13.5 SKW Piesteritz GmbH
  • 13.6 SABIC Global Technologies BV
  • 13.7 Rhodia Operations SASU
  • 13.8 Nico Orgo Manures
  • 13.9 National Fertilizers Limited
  • 13.10 Koch Agronomic Services LLC
  • 13.11 IFFCO
  • 13.12 Evonik Industries
  • 13.13 EuroChem Agro GmbH
  • 13.14 DowDuPont
  • 13.15 Corteva Agriscience
  • 13.16 Compo Expert GmbH
  • 13.17 Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd.
  • 13.18 RainAg

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Product Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrification Inhibitors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Dicyandiamide (DCD) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrapyrin (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By DMPP (3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urease Inhibitors (UIs) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(n-Butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By N-(2-Nitrophenyl) Phosphoric Triamide (NPPT) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Hydroquinone (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Product Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nutrient Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrogen (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Ammonia (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Nitrate (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Urea (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Nutrient Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Crop Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Cereals & Grains (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Corn (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Wheat (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Rice (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Oilseeds & Pulses (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soybean (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Canola (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fruits & Vegetables (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Crop Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Application Method (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Fertigation (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Foliar (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Soil Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Coating/Granular Application (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 34 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other Application Methods (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 35 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Distribution Channel (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 36 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Online Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 37 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Offline Retail (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 38 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 39 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 40 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Farmers (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 41 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Agribusiness Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 42 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Non-Agricultural Sector (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 43 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Golf Courses & Turf Management (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 44 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Horticulture (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 45 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Landscaping (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 46 Global Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.