查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1948746

石油和天然气产业电动潜水泵（ESP）市场－全球产业规模、份额、趋势、机会和预测：按应用、运作方式、地区和竞争格局划分，2021-2031年

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP), in Oil and Gas Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Application (Onshore, offshore), By Operation (Single Stage, Multistage), By Region & Competition, 2021-2031F
出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 180 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

简介目录

全球石油和天然气用电动潜水泵 (ESP) 市场预计将从 2025 年的 78.1 亿美元增长到 2031 年的 123.1 亿美元，复合年增长率为 7.88%。

电潜泵（ESP）是一种安装在井眼中的专用多级离心式帮浦系统，旨在将中等至大量的流体从油井输送到地面。其市场主要驱动因素是提高老旧成熟油田采收率的内在需求，以及从深水和传统型油藏高效、大容量储存的营运要求。这些驱动因素构成了在自然减压环境下维持全球能源生产的基本基础设施需求，而非暂时的技术变革。

市场概览
预测期 2027-2031
市场规模：2025年 78.1亿美元
市场规模：2031年 123.1亿美元
复合年增长率：2026-2031年 7.88%
成长最快的细分市场 多阶段
最大的市场 北美洲

业界近期的技术发展重点凸显了对电潜泵（ESP）技术的依赖。根据石油工程师协会（SPE）预测，2024年各大石油技术大会上，64%的人工抽油技术报告将聚焦于电潜泵，显示业界明显倾向采用此方法而非其他方案。然而，市场扩张仍面临诸多障碍，包括泵浦故障、复杂油井作业带来的高昂营运成本，尤其是在高气油比和存在磨蚀性固态的恶劣环境下。

市场驱动因素

成熟枯竭油藏的再生是市场的主要驱动力，由此产生了高容量人工抽油系统的需求，以应对自然降血压。随着主要采油阶段的结束，业者不得不使用这些泵浦来维持永续性，尤其是在现有油田，需要大规模的流体抽取能力来应对不断增加的排水量。这一趋势在巴西尤为明显，该国正在实施大规模的油井干预措施以延长资产寿命。根据贝克休斯公司于2024年4月发布的2024年第一季财报，该公司已与巴西石油公司（Petrobras）签订合同，将在Baiaterra丛集的450口油井中安装电潜泵。这表明，对于面临产量大幅下降风险的现有储存而言，电潜泵对于维持产量至关重要。

此外，传统型油气开发的扩张对潜水泵解决方案产生了显着需求。这些储存初期采收率下降迅速，含水量高，因此，能够处理磨蚀性固态和应对流量波动的泵送系统至关重要。因此，二迭纪盆地等主要盆地的营运商正依靠电潜泵（ESP）来确保长期稳定的生产。根据美国能源资讯署（EIA）2024年10月发布的《钻井生产力报告》，二迭纪盆地的原油日产量预计将达到约650万桶，将产生大规模的基础设施需求。这种营运需求反映在主要设备供应商的财务表现；SLB于2024年10月发布的2024年第三季公布财报，其生产系统业务的收入为31亿美元。这主要得益于人工泵送设备的销售，凸显了该技术在优化传统型地层采收率方面发挥的关键作用。

市场挑战

全球电潜泵（ESP）市场成长的主要障碍是频繁的泵浦故障导致营运成本飙升，进而引发昂贵且复杂的井下作业。在瓦斯比高、有磨蚀性固态的恶劣矿区环境中，电潜泵系统容易发生气锁和机械应力，进而显着缩短其运作。这种可靠性问题对营运商构成重大的经济障碍，因为意外停机造成的经济损失以及需要大型作业钻机来回收地下设备的费用往往超过系统的初始投资效益。因此，上游企业通常不愿意在技术难度高或获利能力的资产上使用电潜泵，因为这些资产的利润率太低，无法承受这些不定期的维护成本。

这种运作稳定性的缺失迫使营运商选择效率较低但更可靠的替代方案，从而阻碍了市场扩张。近期行业绩效指标凸显了可靠性问题的严重性。根据石油工程师协会 (SPE) 的数据，2024 年全球前四分之一的电潜泵 (ESP) 故障率为 10.8%。这一数字表明，即使在优化的运行环境下，预计仍会出现较高的故障率，这意味着行业平均故障率甚至更高。如此高的故障率直接导致每桶原油开采成本上升，造成财务不确定性，阻碍了对成本敏感的传统型储存采用电潜泵技术。

市场趋势

永磁马达 (PMM) 技术正在逐步取代感应马达。 PMM 技术能够提供效率更高、功率密度更大的系统。透过使用稀土元素磁铁消除励磁损耗，PMM 可显着降低发热量，从而能够在更窄的井筒中运作。这项技术进步直接降低了人工抽油的能耗，同时也提高了热储存的可靠性。其经济效益十分显着。根据贝克休斯公司 2024 年 3 月发布的案例研究《整合生产解决方案使二迭纪盆地油井产量翻番，每月电力成本减半》，Magneficient 公司的 PMM 技术的应用使一家运营商仅在电力成本方面每月就节省了约 4,000 美元。

同时，人工智慧驱动的预测性维护模型的集成，正透过利用即时数据进行故障预测，从而变革营运策略。营运商现在利用分析温度和振动波动的演算法，动态调整泵浦参数，避免被动维修。这种主动策略减轻了意外停机造成的经济损失，并最大限度地延长了设备的使用寿命。这项创新技术的优势显而易见。根据纽约石油研究院 (NYBL) 2024 年 6 月发布的报告《透过人工智慧驱动的电潜泵运行参数优化提高石油产量》，liftAI 技术的应用表明，透过先进的故障预测，泵浦的使用寿命最多可延长 20%。

目录

第一章概述

第二章：调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章：客户心声

第五章：全球油气产业电动潜水帮浦（ESP）市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
    • 按金额
  • 市占率及预测
    • 依应用方式（陆地、海洋）
    • 依操作方法（单级、多级）
    • 按地区
    • 按公司（2025 年）
  • 市场地图

第六章：北美油气产业电动潜水帮浦（ESP）市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 北美洲：国别分析
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

第七章：欧洲油气应用电动潜水帮浦（ESP）市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 欧洲：国别分析
    • 德国
    • 法国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 西班牙

第八章：亚太地区油气市场电动潜水帮浦（ESP）展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 亚太地区：国别分析
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韩国
    • 澳洲

第九章：中东和非洲石油天然气产业电动潜水泵（ESP）市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 中东与非洲：国别分析
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 南非

第十章：南美洲油气产业电动潜水帮浦（ESP）市场展望

  • 市场规模及预测
  • 市占率及预测
  • 南美洲：国别分析
    • 巴西
    • 哥伦比亚
    • 阿根廷

第十一章 市场动态

  • 促进因素
  • 任务

第十二章 市场趋势与发展

  • 併购
  • 产品发布
  • 近期趋势

第十三章：全球油气产业电动潜水帮浦（ESP）市场：SWOT分析

第十四章：波特五力分析

  • 产业竞争
  • 新进入者的潜力
  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 顾客权力
  • 替代品的威胁

第十五章 竞争格局

  • Schlumberger Limited
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • Weatherford International plc
  • Levare International Limited
  • Novomet
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Atlas Copco AB
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Flowserve Corporation

第十六章 策略建议

第十七章：关于研究公司及免责声明

简介目录
Product Code: 23150

The Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market is projected to expand from USD 7.81 Billion in 2025 to USD 12.31 Billion by 2031, reflecting a CAGR of 7.88%. Functioning as a specialized multistage centrifugal pump system installed downhole, the ESP is designed to transport moderate to substantial volumes of fluids from wellbores to the surface. The market's primary catalyst is the essential need to boost recovery rates from aging mature fields, coupled with the operational requirement for efficient, high-volume extraction in deepwater and unconventional reservoirs. These drivers constitute fundamental infrastructural necessities for maintaining global energy output amidst natural pressure declines, rather than representing temporary technological shifts.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2027-2031
Market Size 2025USD 7.81 Billion
Market Size 2031USD 12.31 Billion
CAGR 2026-20317.88%
Fastest Growing SegmentMultistage
Largest MarketNorth America

This dependence on ESP technology is highlighted by recent technical priorities within the industry. According to the Society of Petroleum Engineers, in 2024, 64% of technical submissions concerning artificial lift at major conferences were dedicated to Electric Submersible Pumps, indicating a distinct sector preference for this method over other options. Despite this, a major obstacle hindering wider market growth persists in the form of high operational costs linked to pump failures and complicated well interventions, especially within harsh environments characterized by high gas-to-oil ratios or abrasive solids.

Market Driver

The rehabilitation of mature and depleted oil reservoirs serves as a leading market driver, requiring high-volume artificial lift systems to counteract natural pressure reduction. As primary recovery phases end, operators are compelled to utilize these pumps to sustain economic feasibility, especially in legacy fields where significant fluid lifting capacity is needed to manage rising water cuts. This trend was clearly demonstrated in Brazil, where extensive interventions are being applied to prolong asset life. According to Baker Hughes, April 2024, in the 'First Quarter 2024 Results', the firm won a contract from Petrobras to install electrical submersible pumps in 450 wells within the Bahia-Terra cluster, illustrating how ESPs are crucial for maintaining output in established reservoirs facing potential steep declines.

Additionally, the growth of unconventional shale developments generates significant demand for submersible pumping solutions. Because these reservoirs face rapid initial decline rates and high water volumes, they necessitate lift systems capable of handling abrasive solids and variable flow rates. As a result, operators in major basins such as the Permian depend on ESPs to ensure stable long-term production. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, October 2024, in the 'Drilling Productivity Report', oil production in the Permian region was anticipated to hit roughly 6.5 million barrels per day, driving substantial infrastructure needs. This operational demand mirrors the financial results of leading equipment suppliers; according to SLB, October 2024, in the 'Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Release', Production Systems revenue hit USD 3.1 billion, fueled largely by artificial lift sales, highlighting the technology's essential role in optimizing recovery from unconventional formations.

Market Challenge

The principal obstacle restricting the growth of the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) market is the elevated operational expenditure caused by frequent pump failures and the subsequent necessity for expensive, complex well interventions. Within harsh extraction settings defined by high gas-to-oil ratios or abrasive solids, ESP systems are susceptible to gas locking and mechanical stress, which drastically reduces their operational lifespan. This reliability concern establishes a significant economic hurdle for operators, as the financial costs of unplanned downtime and the need for heavy workover rigs to recover downhole equipment often exceed the system's initial capital efficiency. As a result, upstream companies are often discouraged from utilizing ESPs in technically challenging or marginal assets where profit margins are too thin to absorb these erratic maintenance expenses.

This lack of operational stability restricts the market's reach by compelling operators to opt for alternatives that may be less volume-efficient but offer greater robustness. The gravity of this reliability issue is evident in recent industry performance metrics. According to the Society of Petroleum Engineers, in 2024, the global top-quartile benchmark for ESP failure indices stood at 10.8%. This figure suggests that even the most optimized operations expect a notable frequency of failure, implying that the wider industry average is significantly higher. Such high failure rates lead directly to increased lifting costs per barrel, creating financial uncertainty that impedes the widespread implementation of ESP technology in cost-conscious unconventional reservoirs.

Market Trends

The shift toward Permanent Magnet Motor (PMM) technology is displacing induction motors by providing systems with enhanced efficiency and power density. By employing rare-earth magnets to negate excitation losses, PMMs drastically lower heat production and facilitate operations within slimmer wellbores. This advancement directly decreases the energy intensity of artificial lift while bolstering reliability in thermal reservoirs. The economic advantage is distinct; according to Baker Hughes, March 2024, in the 'Integrated production solution doubled production, cut monthly electric costs in half in Permian wells' case study, the utilization of Magnefficient PMM technology allowed an operator to save roughly USD 4,000 per month in electricity expenses alone.

Concurrently, the incorporation of AI-driven predictive maintenance models is reshaping operational strategies by leveraging real-time data to predict failures. Operators are now utilizing algorithms that examine temperature and vibration variances to dynamically modify pump parameters, thereby preventing reactive repairs. This forward-looking strategy mitigates the financial repercussions of unplanned downtime and maximizes asset durability. The merit of this innovation is measurable; according to nybl, June 2024, in the 'Enhance Oil Production by Optimizing ESP Operating Parameters Using AI' report, the application of liftAI technology showed the ability to prolong pump lifespan by up to 20% via advanced failure prediction.

Key Market Players

  • Schlumberger Limited
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • Weatherford International plc
  • Levare International Limited
  • Novomet
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Atlas Copco AB
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Flowserve Corporation

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Application

  • Onshore
  • offshore

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Operation

  • Single Stage
  • Multistage

Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market, By Region

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Application (Onshore, offshore)
    • 5.2.2. By Operation (Single Stage, Multistage)
    • 5.2.3. By Region
    • 5.2.4. By Company (2025)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Application
    • 6.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.2.3. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.3.2. Canada Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Operation

7. Europe Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Application
    • 7.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.2.3. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.2. France Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.4. Italy Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Operation
    • 7.3.5. Spain Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Operation

8. Asia Pacific Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Application
    • 8.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.2.3. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.2. India Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.3. Japan Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Operation
    • 8.3.5. Australia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Operation

9. Middle East & Africa Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Application
    • 9.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.2.3. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.3.2. UAE Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Operation

10. South America Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Application
    • 10.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.2.3. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Operation
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Operation

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) in Oil and Gas Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Schlumberger Limited
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. Baker Hughes Company
  • 15.3. Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
  • 15.4. Weatherford International plc
  • 15.5. Levare International Limited
  • 15.6. Novomet
  • 15.7. Grundfos Holding A/S
  • 15.8. Atlas Copco AB
  • 15.9. Sulzer Ltd.
  • 15.10. Flowserve Corporation

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer