查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场 - 全球和区域分析：新兴企业、政策框架和国家 - 分析和预测（2025-2035）
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1744396

农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场 - 全球和区域分析：新兴企业、政策框架和国家 - 分析和预测（2025-2035）

Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Emerging Startups, Policy Framework, and Country-wise Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2025-2035
出版日期: | 出版商: BIS Research | 英文 149 Pages | 商品交期: 1-5个工作天内

价格

农业、林业和土地利用的碳信用额度市场规模庞大，将吸收大气中二氧化碳或避免温室气体排放的农场实践收益，将覆盖作物、减少耕作、农林业和泥炭地恢復等再生技术转化为可交易的环境资产。

在这个自愿性市场领域，每个信用额度代表透过农业活动消除或避免的一公吨二氧化碳当量，这些活动须经严格的框架检验，例如 Verra 的 VCS、黄金标准气候与农业方法，或欧盟的碳去除与低碳农业 (CRCF) 法规。透过将私人资本引入土壤健康和土地利用创新，该市场为农民提供了新的收入来源，并透过可扩展的基于自然的解决方案增强了全球气候减缓努力。

主要市场统计数据
预测期 2025-2035
2025年的估值 88亿美元
2035年预测 670.7亿美元
复合年增长率 22.51%

市场介绍

截至2024年，农业碳信用额度约占农业、林业和其他土地利用（AFOLU）市场2.16亿吨二氧化碳当量中的1亿吨二氧化碳当量，平均价格为4-6美元/吨二氧化碳当量，比林业溢价低近15%。大型食品和农业综合相关企业（例如拜耳旗下的ForGround、Indigo Ag和Nutrien）已在北美和欧洲招募了3000多家生产商，并正在使用基于卫星的监测、报告和检验（MRV）工具来简化计划检验。儘管势头强劲，但由于方法论的碎片化以及投资者对永久性和额外性的谨慎，信用额度仍然受到限制，农业在AFOLU总发行量中的份额仍约为30%。

未来十年，在欧盟自愿性CRCF认证以及美国根据《通膨削减法案》预期推出的「碳农业」奖励等强劲政策驱动下，预计到2035年，农业信贷的年度发放量将翻一番，达到2亿吨二氧化碳当量以上。数位化MRV发展（例如基于无人机的土壤碳测绘、基于区块链的註册系统以及基于人工智慧的排放模型）预计将计划开发成本降低20-30%，并鼓励小农户和特色作物生产者的参与。同时，快速消费品、零售、金融服务和其他公司已准备好将农场信贷纳入综合保护组合。

对产业的影响

蓬勃发展的碳信用市场正迫使相关企业企业集团和投入品供应商重新调整其投资组合。科迪华农业科技和 Nutrien 等领先的种子和肥料製造商目前正在将大量研发预算分配给符合土壤碳通讯协定的碳智慧产品（例如，犁地种子披衣、营养高效接种剂）。这种转变不仅开闢了新的服务线，还使农民能够从种子包衣和微生物生物刺激素中每公顷获得 15-25 美元的预付款，从而对冲收益流免受商品价格波动的影响。作为回应，私募股权基金正在企业联合组织交易，将土壤碳实践与精密农业感测器捆绑在一起，承保「设备即服务」合同，以同时提供农业和碳成果。

农场营运正在系统地重新设计，以优化碳封存并实现产量目标。约翰迪尔和爱科等设备OEM正在推出支援遥测的带式施肥机和高地隙气播设备，可减少高达 80% 的土壤扰动。这些机器直接与碳量化平台（例如 Carbonview 专案）集成，可自动向检验记录减少耕作路径和残留物覆盖度的指标。透过将碳信用合格作为原生功能，营运商可以简化第三方审核，将检验时间从 90 天缩短至 30 天以内，每英亩增加 10-15 美元的收益，并有效降低精密设备的盈亏平衡成本 8-12%。

谷物经销商、乙醇生产商和食品加工商越来越多地将承购合约与检验的碳属性挂钩。 CHS 和阿彻丹尼尔斯米德兰公司 (ADM) 等大型合作社已设立碳差异化基差溢价，向农民支付每蒲式耳 0.50-1.00 美元的额外费用，用于交付持有监管链 (CoC) 碳证书的玉米。为了增强可追溯性，这些买家正在整合 Xpansiv 和 Persefoni 等供应商提供的区块链帐本，以便即时核对登记记录的烧录情况和谷物实际产量。此类框架降低了重复计算的风险，并允许加工商向终端市场报告碳中和产品。

从农化巨头到跨国粮食贸易商等行业相关人员一直在利用碳信用组合作为对冲新合规制度和边境调整措施的策略性对冲。例如，欧盟提案的碳边境调整机制 (CBAM) 将奖励欧盟以外的大豆和玉米出口商将其内嵌排放内部化，碳信用的有效估值高达 33.96 美元/吨二氧化碳。拥有成熟 AFOLU 信用管道的公司可以透过自愿信用註销来抵消潜在的 CBAM 负债，从而平滑关税风险。同时，保险公司正在提供客製化的「碳绩效」承保，透过降低 10-15% 的检验碳汇农场的保费，将碳信用的经济性进一步嵌入行业风险模型中。

市场区隔

细分一：按应用

  • 拆除计划
  • 迴避计划
  • 组合计划

清除计划领域主导全球农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场（按应用）

以清除为重点的努力已迅速成为农业、林业和土地利用领域碳信用市场的前沿，因为它们将碳无限期地锁定在土壤和生物质中，而不是简单地避免未来的排放。深根覆盖作物、生物炭土壤改良剂和综合农林业等技术不仅可以封存二氧化碳，还可以提高土壤肥力、产量稳定性和生态系统多样性。高解析度卫星影像和人工智慧土壤碳模型的出现降低了 MRV 成本和审核时间。随着欧盟碳清除和碳农业条例等监管制度越来越多地奖励真正的清除，以清除为重点的计划可能会占 AFOLU 信用需求的很大一部分。

细分2：按计划类型

  • 林业和土地利用
    • REDD+计划
    • ARR
    • IFM
  • 农业

预计林业部门将在 2024 年至 2035 年期间超过其他 AFOLU 部门，因为林业部门每公顷具有很高的碳储存潜力、成熟的测量方法以及企业净零计画的强劲需求。遥感探测的最新改进已将检验成本降低了 30%，使大规模重新造林和改善森林管理计划更具有融资可行性。同时，欧盟的碳去除和碳农场 (CRCF) 规则等监管顺风明确优先考虑人工林等长寿命、基于自然的去除，从而推动了溢价（比 VCM 平均值高出 15%）以及与主要工业排放的长期承购协议。此外，林业计划提供的协同效益（生物多样性、流域保护、社区生计）与不断发展的 ESG 指令一致，进一步巩固了林业在农业和土地使用自愿碳信用市场中的主导成长轨迹。

细分3：按地区

  • 北美—美国、加拿大、墨西哥
  • 欧洲
  • 亚太地区－中国、日本、韩国、印度及世界其他地区
  • 世界其他地区 – 巴西、南非等。

2024年，亚太地区引领农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场，这得益于大规模农业的融合、中国、日本和韩国雄心勃勃的企业净零目标以及政府「低碳农业」奖励的迅速扩大。在中国，农业农村部的农业补贴改革将补贴与土壤碳封存试点挂钩，释放了数亿美元的计划投资。在基准排放更高、封存潜力更大的新兴市场，具有成本竞争力的产量推动AFOLU信用额度发放与前一年同期比较增38%，而数位化MRV平台将检验週期从数月缩短至数週，进一步加快了部署速度。这些因素使亚太地区成为成长最快的地区，在数量和价值成长方面均超过北美和欧洲。

全球农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场的最新趋势

  • 2025年4月，全球土壤碳市场领导者Boomitra与第一家获得认可的、以完全诚信的方式发放碳信用额、并充分整合自然生态系统和社会影响的碳认证机构社会碳基金会宣布透过Boomitra URVARA计划首次发放土壤有机碳（SOC）去除信用额，标誌着全球农业碳信用额市场取得一系列重要里程碑。
  • 2025年3月，专注于再生农业和碳农业技术的农业技术新兴企业Grow Indigo从英国发展金融机构英国国际投资公司（BII）获得1000万美元融资。资金筹措旨在扩大Start-Ups的永续性倡议（该计划已涵盖印度七个邦的250万英亩农地），并加速其碳信用计划，使小农户受益。
  • 2024年10月，拜耳、GenZero（金融巨头淡马锡的全资子公司）、壳牌和三菱商事这四家全球巨头决定在九个州扩展其碳信用额度计划，以赋能农民。该计划将透过采用智慧农业、交替灌溉和旱作农业（AWD）以及直播水稻（DSR）等技术来产生信用额度。这些信用额度将进行交易，帮助农民赚取额外收入。该联盟计划扩大该计划的覆盖面积，包括增加近8500公顷，简化稻田温室气体（GHG）排放的科学测量，并加强对农民的援助和支持系统。该计划还计划在实施前两年累积的经验基础上，进一步考虑扩大规模。

需求——驱动因素与限制因素

市场需求驱动：2050年达成净零碳排放目标

企业 2050 年净零排放承诺正推动对高完整性农业、林业和土地利用 (AFOLU) 信用额度的需求激增。联合利华的大部分排放依赖农业供应链，自 2015 年以来，该公司已将排放直接和能源采购排放减少了 70% 以上，併计划最早在 2030 年将剩余排放减少到零。为了缩小内部减排和绝对中和之间的差距，该公司正在从拉丁美洲和东南亚的计划进行多年期土壤碳和林业信用额度购买。在 2020 年实现营运中和后，苹果承诺到 2030 年实现全价值链中和，其恢復基金将在巴西和巴拉圭部署约 2.8 亿美元用于保护和重新造林计划，特别针对持久性砍伐。在获得「基于科学的目标」倡议的核准后，奢侈品集团开云集团承诺到2030年将其范围一和范围二的排放在2015年的基础上减少90%，并透过采购基于自然的信用额度来实现这一目标。英格卡集团（IKEA）同样计划在2030年将其价值链排放减半，并承诺大量收购AFOLU信用额度以抵销剩余排放。这些紧迫的净零排放蓝图有效地将企业永续性承诺转化为对AFOLU碳计划的现实需求，刺激了市场成长并为计划融资提供了支撑。

市场限制：土地所有权的不确定性和登记延迟

土地所有权的不确定性和登记延迟削弱了农业、林业和土地利用计划获得碳信用发放的基本合格。领先的登记开发通讯协定，例如 Verra 的 VM0042（用于改善农业土地管理），要求计划提案透过永久业权、长期租赁或在国家土地管理局登记的同等合法所有权，证明其对土地拥有明确的、法律认可的权利。然而，在非洲和拉丁美洲的许多地方，传统所拥有土地製度与法律制度共存，导致正式所有权持有不明确。计划开发商通常要花 6 到 12 个月甚至更长的时间签署租约并协商所有权澄清，然后才申请登记。这个漫长的预登记阶段会延迟信用额度的发放并增加交易成本，降低计划内部报酬率并抑制依赖精简入职流程的小农聚集模式。

区块链通证化正在彻底改变农业、林业和土地利用碳信用额的获取方式，将传统上流动性差且被绑定在註册中心的抵消额转化为可程式设计的数位资产，这些数位资产可以在公开市场上全天候交易。透过通证化，每个碳信用（原本以註册中心管理的证书形式发放）都被「桥接」到区块链网路上，并被铸造为可认证或不可认证的通证。这个流程允许部分所有权、链上赎回、即时来源证明，并且智慧合约可以自动遵守註册中心的规则和赎回通讯协定。因此，市场参与企业可以进行小批量交易，直接从零售钱包参与排碳权市场，并透过公共帐本即时验证退役状态。透过降低最低交易规模并避免繁琐的双边谈判，通证化将碳市场开放给更广泛的私人投资者、个人、家族办公室和小型企业买家，同时保持註册中心所要求的高诚信标准。

产品/创新策略：产品类型帮助读者了解农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场的各种产品和应用。此外，它还提供了按应用（清除计划、规避计划、组合计划）和产品类型（林业和土地利用（包括REDD+、ARR、IFM）以及农业）对农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场进行详细解读的机会。

成长/行销策略：农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场正在见证主要企业的重大发展，包括业务扩张、联盟、合作和合资企业。各公司首选的策略是伙伴关係、达成协议和扩张，以加强其在农业碳信用市场的地位。例如，2024 年 8 月，联合国粮食及农业组织 (FAO) 和国家农业和农村发展银行 (NABARD) 在孟买举行了一次高级别会议，以建立伙伴关係并加强两机构之间的合作。这次会议标誌着印度在开发碳基金、加强农民生产者组织 (FPO) 和促进永续农业系统方面的合作迈出了重要一步。

竞争策略：本研究分析并概述了农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场的主要企业，包括为各种用途提供碳信用的主要参与者。此外，伙伴关係、协议和联盟等全面的竞争策略有助于读者了解市场中尚未开发的收益来源。

主要市场参与企业及竞争格局

农业、林业和土地使用碳信用市场中介绍的公司是根据广泛的二手资料研究选出的，其中包括公司范围分析、产品系列分析、市场渗透以及从主要专家那里收集到的见解。

农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场既有对市场有透彻了解并已确立自身地位的主要企业，也有寻求在这个竞争激烈的市场中站稳脚跟的新兴企业。 2024年，农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场将由现有参与者主导，占78%的市场占有率。另一方面，新兴企业占了22%的市场。随着各行各业越来越重视采用更永续的解决方案，我们很可能会看到越来越多的参与者逐年进入全球农业碳信用市场。

本报告研究了全球农业、林业和土地使用碳信用市场，概述了市场状况以及应用、计划类型和地区的趋势，并介绍了参与市场的公司概况。

目录

执行摘要

第一章 市场

  • 趋势：现况与未来影响评估
  • 供应链概览
  • 研发评审
  • 监管状况
  • 相关利益者分析
  • 新兴Start-Ups
  • 市场动态概览
  • Start-Ups资金筹措摘要

第二章 应用

  • 应用程式细分
  • 使用摘要
  • 农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场、林业和土地利用（按应用）
    • 拆除计划
    • 迴避计划
    • 组合计划

第三章 产品

  • 产品细分
  • 产品摘要
  • 农业、林业和土地利用碳信用市场（按计划类型）
    • 林业和土地利用
    • 农业

第四章 区域

  • 区域摘要
  • 驱动因素和约束因素
  • 北美洲
  • 欧洲
  • 亚太地区
  • 其他地区

第五章 市场竞争基准化分析与公司概况

  • 未来展望
  • 地理评估
    • Indigo Ag, Inc.
    • Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
    • Terra Global Capital
    • South Pole
    • Nori, Inc.
    • The California Air Resources Board
    • Cargill, Incorporated
    • Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
    • Ecosystem Services Market Consortium
    • Bayer AG
    • 3Degrees Group, Inc
    • NATUREOFFICE
    • Climetrek
    • EKI Energy Services Ltd.
    • Finite Carbon Corporation

第六章调查方法

Product Code: AGA1969SB

This report can be delivered within 1 working day.

Introduction of Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use

The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use monetizes on-farm practices that sequester atmospheric CO2 or avoid greenhouse gas emissions, transforming regenerative techniques, such as cover cropping, reduced tillage, agroforestry, and peatland restoration, into tradable environmental assets. In this voluntary market segment, each credit represents one metric ton of CO2e removed or avoided by agricultural activities, validated under rigorous frameworks such as Verra's VCS, Gold Standard's Climate and Agriculture methodology, or the emerging EU Carbon Removals & Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation. By channeling private capital into soil health and land-use innovations, the market offers farmers new revenue streams and bolsters global climate mitigation efforts through scalable, nature-based solutions.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Forecast Period2025 - 2035
2025 Evaluation$8.80 Billion
2035 Forecast$67.07 Billion
CAGR22.51%

Market Introduction

As of 2024, agricultural carbon credits account for roughly 100 Mt CO2e of the ~216 Mt CO2e in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) voluntary market, with prices averaging $4-6/tCO2e, nearly 15 % below forestry premiums. Leading food and agribusiness firms (e.g., Bayer's ForGround, Indigo Ag, Nutrien) have enrolled over 3,000 growers across North America and Europe, leveraging satellite-based monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) tools to streamline project validation. Despite this momentum, fragmented methodology adoption and investor caution around permanence and additionality continue to constrain credit volumes, keeping agriculture's share at approximately 30 % of total AFOLU issuance.

Over the next decade, robust policy drivers, such as the EU's CRCF voluntary certification and anticipated U.S. "carbon farming" incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act, are expected to double annual agriculture-credit issuances to 200+ Mt CO2e by 2035. Advances in digital MRV (including drone-enabled soil-carbon mapping, blockchain-based registries, and AI-driven emissions modeling) will lower project development costs by 20-30 %, unlocking participation among smallholder and specialty-crop producers. Meanwhile, corporates across CPG, retail, and financial services are poised to integrate on-farm credits into comprehensive nature-positive portfolios.

Industrial Impact

The burgeoning carbon credits market compels agribusiness conglomerates and input suppliers to recalibrate their investment portfolios. Leading seed and fertilizer manufacturers, such as Corteva Agriscience and Nutrien, now allocate substantial R&D budgets toward carbon-smart products (e.g., low-tillage seed coatings, nutrient-use-efficiency inoculants) that qualify for soil?carbon protocols. This shift not only opens new service lines, but farmers can earn $15-$25/ha in upfront payments for adopting coated seeds or microbial biostimulants, as well as hedge revenue streams against commodity-price volatility. In response, private equity funds have been syndicating deals to bundle soil-carbon practices with precision?agriculture sensors, underwriting equipment-as-a-service contracts that deliver both agronomic and carbon outcomes.

On-farm operations have been undergoing a systemic redesign to optimize carbon sequestration alongside yield goals. Equipment OEMs such as John Deere and AGCO deploy telemetry-enabled, banded-application fertilizer rigs and high-clearance air seeding implements that reduce soil disturbance by up to 80%. These machines integrate directly with carbon?quantification platforms (e.g., Project Carbonview), automatically logging reduced-till passes and residue cover metrics to verifiers. By embedding carbon-credit eligibility as a native feature, operators streamline third?party audits, shrinking verification timelines from 90 days to under 30 days and capturing incremental returns of $10-$15 per acre, effectively lowering the breakeven cost of precision equipment by 8-12 %.

Grain handlers, ethanol producers, and food processors are increasingly conditioning offtake contracts on verified carbon attributes. Major cooperatives such as CHS and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) have instituted "carbon?differentiated basis premiums," paying farmers an extra $0.50-$1.00/bushel for corn delivered with chain-of-custody carbon certificates. To enforce traceability, these buyers integrate blockchain-anchored ledgers powered by providers such as Xpansiv and Persefoni that reconcile registry retirements with physical grain loads in real-time. Such frameworks reduce double?counting risk and allow processors to report carbon-neutral products to end markets, fetching 5-10 % price premiums in Europe and North America under voluntary labeling schemes.

Industrial stakeholders, from agrochemical giants to multinational grain traders, have been leveraging carbon-credit portfolios as a strategic hedge against emerging compliance regimes and border adjustment measures. For example, the EU's proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) incentivizes non-EU soy and maize exporters to internalize embedded emissions, effectively valuing carbon credits at up to $33.96 / tCO2. Companies with established AFOLU-credit channels can offset potential CBAM liabilities by retiring voluntary credits, thereby smoothing tariff exposures. Simultaneously, insurers are offering bespoke "carbon-performance" underwriting, reducing premiums by 10-15 % for farms that maintain verified carbon sinks, further embedding carbon-credit economics into industrial risk models.

Market Segmentation:

Segmentation 1: by Application

  • Removal Project
  • Avoidance Project
  • Combination Project

Removal Project Segment to Dominate the Global Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application)

Removal-focused initiatives have surged to the forefront of the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use sphere because they lock carbon into soils and biomass indefinitely rather than merely averting future emissions. Techniques such as deep-rooting cover crops, biochar soil amendments, and integrated agroforestry not only sequester CO2 but also bolster soil fertility, yield stability, and ecosystem diversity, qualities that satisfy stringent permanence requirements and attract price premiums of 20-30 percent over avoidance credits. The advent of high-resolution satellite imagery and AI-enabled soil-carbon modeling has slashed MRV expenses and accelerated audit timelines, further enticing corporate buyers who need demonstrable, long-lasting offsets for their net-zero commitments. As regulatory regimes such as the EU's Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation increasingly reward genuine removals, removal-centric projects will continue to command the lion's share of AFOLU credit demand.

Segmentation 2: by Project Type

  • Forestry and Land Use
    • REDD+
    • ARR
    • IFM
  • Agriculture

Forestry Segment to Witness the Highest Growth between 2024 and 2035

The forestry segment is set to outpace other AFOLU categories from 2024 through 2035 due to its superior per-hectare carbon-sequestration potential, well-established measurement methodologies, and strong demand from corporate net-zero programs. Recent enhancements in remote?sensing and LiDAR-based forest-growth modeling have slashed verification costs by up to 30%, making large-scale reforestation and improved forest management projects more bankable. Simultaneously, regulatory tailwinds, such as the EU's Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, explicitly prioritize long-lived, nature-based removals such as afforestation, driving premium pricing (+15% vs. the VCM average) and long-term offtake contracts from major industrial emitters. Moreover, forestry projects deliver co-benefits (biodiversity, watershed protection, community livelihoods) that align with evolving ESG mandates, further reinforcing forestry's dominant growth trajectory in the voluntary carbon credits market for agriculture and land use.

Segmentation 3: by Region

  • North America - U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific- China, Japan, South Korea, India, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • Rest-of-the-World- Brazil, South Africa, and Others

Asia-Pacific led the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use in 2024 owing to a convergence of large-scale farming operations, ambitious corporate net-zero targets in China, Japan, and South Korea, and rapidly expanding government "carbon farming" incentives. In China, agricultural subsidy reforms under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs tied payments to soil-carbon sequestration pilots, unlocking hundreds of millions of dollars in project investment; meanwhile, Japan's Farm Carbon Offset Program and South Korea's Green New Deal both mandate voluntary agriculture offsets for key industrial sectors. Cost-competitive yields in emerging markets, where baseline emissions are higher and sequestration potential is vast, have driven a 38% year-on-year jump in AFOLU credit issuance, while digital MRV platforms have slashed verification timelines from months to weeks, further accelerating uptake. These factors have positioned Asia-Pacific as the fastest-growing region, outpacing both North America and Europe in volume and value growth.

Recent Developments in the Global Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use

  • In April 2025, Boomitra, a global leader in soil carbon markets, and the Social Carbon Foundation, the first accredited carbon certifier to fully integrate natural ecosystem and social impact in a high integrity carbon credit, announced the first issuance of soil organic carbon (SOC) removal credits through the Boomitra URVARA Project, marking a series of significant milestones in the global carbon credits market for agriculture.
  • In March 2025, Grow Indigo, an agritech startup focused on regenerative agriculture and carbon farming, raised $10 million in funding from British International Investments (BII), the U.K.'s development finance institution. The funding aims to help expand the startup's sustainability initiatives, which already cover 2.5 million acres of farmland across seven Indian states, and accelerate its carbon credit program to benefit smallholder farmers.
  • In October 2024, four big global companies, Bayer, GenZero (a wholly-owned arm of financial major Temasek), Shell, and Mitsubishi, decided to scale up their carbon credit program in nine states to empower farmers. The credits are generated through the adoption of smart agriculture practices, alternate wetting and drying (AWD), and direct seeded rice (DSR). These credits could be traded to enable farmers to get some extra income. The alliance planned to expand its program by adding nearly 8,500 hectares, streamlining the scientific measurement of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies, and strengthening the farmer handholding and support system. The program further aimed to explore scale-up based on the experiences of the first two years of implementation.

Demand - Drivers and Limitations

Market Demand Drivers: Achieving Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Goal by 2050

Corporate net-zero commitments by 2050 have rapidly escalated demand for high?integrity agricultural, forestry, and land?use (AFOLU) credits. Unilever, which traces a significant portion of its emissions to agricultural supply chains, has already cut its direct and energy?procured emissions by over 70 % since 2015 and aims to eliminate the remainder as soon as 2030. To bridge the gap between internal reductions and absolute neutrality, multi?year purchases of soil-carbon and forestry credits from projects in Latin America and Southeast Asia are being locked in. Apple, having achieved operational neutrality in 2020, has committed to full value?chain neutrality by 2030; its Restore Fund channels nearly USD 280 million into conservation and reforestation schemes in Brazil and Paraguay, specifically targeting durable removals. Luxury group Kering, approved by the Science Based Targets initiative, has been reducing Scopes 1 and 2 emissions by 90 % versus 2015 levels by 2030, underpinning this ambition with nature?based credit procurement. Ingka Group (IKEA) likewise plans to halve its value?chain emissions by 2030, signaling significant AFOLU credit offtakes to offset residual emissions. These urgent net?zero roadmaps effectively convert corporate sustainability pledges into real?world demand for AFOLU carbon projects, driving market growth and underpinning project finance.

Market Restraints: Land Tenure Uncertainty and Registration Delays

Land tenure uncertainty and registration delays undermine the foundational eligibility of agricultural, forestry, and land use projects for carbon credit issuance. Development protocols across leading registries, such as Verra's VM0042 for Improved Agricultural Land Management, mandate that project proponents demonstrate clear, legally recognized rights to the land through freehold ownership, long?term leases, or equivalent statutory titles registered with national land authorities. In many regions of Africa and Latin America, however, customary land tenure systems coexist alongside statutory regimes, creating ambiguity over who holds formal rights. Project developers often spend six to twelve months, or longer, securing and validating lease agreements or negotiating title clarifications before even applying for registry listing. This protracted pre-registration phase delays credit issuance and escalates transaction costs, eroding project IRRs and deterring smallholder aggregation models that rely on streamlined onboarding.

Market Opportunities: Blockchain Tokenization and Retail Access

Blockchain tokenization has been revolutionizing access to carbon credits for agricultural, forestry, and land use by transforming traditionally illiquid, registry-bound offsets into programmable digital assets that can be traded 24/7 on open markets. Through tokenization, each carbon credit, originally issued as a registry-managed certificate, is "bridged" onto a blockchain network and minted as a fungible or non-fungible token. This process enables fractional ownership, on-chain retirement, and real-time proof of provenance, while smart contracts automate compliance with registry rules and retirement protocols. As a result, buyers can transact in smaller lots, participate directly in carbon credits market from retail wallets, and verify retirement status instantly via public ledgers. By lowering minimum trade sizes and bypassing cumbersome bilateral negotiations, tokenization opens carbon markets to a broader retail investor base, individuals, family offices, and SME buyers while maintaining the high-integrity standards required by registries.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader understand the different types of products and applications for the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use. Moreover, the study provides the reader with a detailed understanding of the carbon credits market for a agriculture, forestry, and land use by application based on application (removal project, avoidance project, and combination project) and product on the basis of project type (forestry and land use, (which comprises of REDD+, ARR, and IFM), and Agriculture.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use has seen major development by key players operating in the market, such as business expansion, partnership, collaboration, and joint venture. The favored strategy for the companies has been partnerships, contracts, and business expansion to strengthen their position in the carbon credits market for agriculture. For instance, in August 2024, The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) held a high-level meeting in Mumbai to forge partnerships and strengthen collaboration between the two organizations. The meeting marked a significant step toward collaborative efforts in developing a carbon fund, strengthening Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), and promoting sustainable agricultural systems in India.

Competitive Strategy: Key players in the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use analyzed and profiled in the study involve major companies offering carbon credits for various applications. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Methodology: The research methodology design adopted for this specific study includes a mix of data collected from primary and secondary data sources. Both primary resources (key players, market leaders, and in-house experts) and secondary research (a host of paid and unpaid databases), along with analytical tools, are employed to build the predictive and forecast models.

Data and validation have been taken into consideration from both primary sources as well as secondary sources.

Key Considerations and Assumptions in Market Engineering and Validation

  • Detailed secondary research has been done to ensure maximum coverage of manufacturers/suppliers operational in a country.
  • To a certain extent, exact revenue information has been extracted for each company from secondary sources and databases. Revenues specific to product/service/technology were then estimated for each market player based on fact-based proxy indicators and primary inputs.
  • Based on the classification, the average selling price (ASP) has been calculated using the weighted average method.
  • The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of Oanda and/or other relevant websites.
  • Any economic downturn in the future has not been taken into consideration for the market estimation and forecast.
  • The base currency considered for the market analysis is US$. Considering the average conversion rate for that particular year, currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations.

Primary Research

The primary sources involve experts from various industries, including the carbon industry and agriculture industry, among others. Respondents such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study.

Secondary Research

This study involves the usage of extensive secondary research, company websites, directories, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Businessweek and others, to collect effective and useful information for a market-oriented, technical, commercial, and extensive study of the global market. In addition to the data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites, such as www.nasa.gov.

Secondary research was done to obtain critical information about the industry's value chain, the market's monetary chain, revenue models, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled for the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use have been selected based on thorough secondary research, which includes analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, market penetration, and insights gathered from primary experts.

The carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use comprises key players who have established themselves thoroughly and understand the market, accompanied by startups looking forward to establishing themselves in this highly competitive market. In 2024, the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use was dominated by established players, accounting for 78% of the market share. In contrast, startups managed to capture 22% of the market. With the increasing focus on adopting more sustainable solutions across various industries, more players will enter the global carbon credits market for agriculture with each passing year.

Some prominent names established in the carbon credits market for agriculture, forestry, and land use are:

  • Indigo Ag, Inc.
  • Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
  • Terra Global Capital
  • South Pole
  • Nori, Inc.
  • The California Air Resources Board (CARB)
  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
  • Ecosystem Services Market Consortium (ESMC)
  • Bayer AG
  • 3Degrees Group, Inc.
  • NATUREOFFICE
  • Climetrek
  • EKI Energy Services Ltd.
  • Finite Carbon Corporation

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope and Definition

1 Markets

  • 1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
    • 1.1.1 Trends: Overview
    • 1.1.2 Adoption of Digital MRV Technologies
    • 1.1.3 Expansion of Long Term Corporate Offtake Agreements
  • 1.2 Supply Chain Overview
    • 1.2.1 Pricing Forecast
  • 1.3 Research and Development Review
    • 1.3.1 Patent Filing Trend (by Country and Company)
  • 1.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 1.5 Stakeholder Analysis
  • 1.6 Emerging Start-Ups
  • 1.7 Market Dynamics Overview
    • 1.7.1 Market Drivers
      • 1.7.1.1 Achieving Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Goal by 2050
      • 1.7.1.2 Digital MRV Protocol Harmonization
      • 1.7.1.3 Carbon-Linked Agricultural Finance and Insurance
    • 1.7.2 Market Restraints
      • 1.7.2.1 Land Tenure Uncertainty and Registration Delays
      • 1.7.2.2 Carbon Permanence and Reversal Risk
    • 1.7.3 Market Opportunities
      • 1.7.3.1 Blockchain Tokenization and Retail Access
      • 1.7.3.2 Blended Finance Structures (Grants + Equity + Debt)
  • 1.8 Startup Funding Summary

2 Application

  • 2.1 Application Segmentation
  • 2.2 Application Summary
  • 2.3 Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application)
    • 2.3.1 Removal Project
    • 2.3.2 Avoidance Project
    • 2.3.3 Combination Project

3 Products

  • 3.1 Product Segmentation
  • 3.2 Product Summary
  • 3.3 Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type)
    • 3.3.1 Forestry and Land Use
      • 3.3.1.1 REDD+
      • 3.3.1.2 ARR
      • 3.3.1.3 IFM
    • 3.3.2 Agriculture

4 Region

  • 4.1 Regional Summary
  • 4.2 Drivers and Restraints
  • 4.3 North America
    • 4.3.1 Market
    • 4.3.2 Key Market Participants in North America
    • 4.3.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.3.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.3.5 Application
    • 4.3.6 Product
      • 4.3.6.1 U.S
        • 4.3.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.3.6.2 Canada
        • 4.3.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.3.6.3 Mexico
        • 4.3.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.3.6.3.2 Product
  • 4.4 Europe
    • 4.4.1 Market
    • 4.4.2 Key Market Participants in Europe
    • 4.4.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.4.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.4.5 Application
    • 4.4.6 Product
  • 4.5 Asia-Pacific
    • 4.5.1 Market
    • 4.5.2 Key Market Participants in Asia-Pacific
    • 4.5.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.5.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.5.5 Application
    • 4.5.6 Product
      • 4.5.6.1 China
        • 4.5.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.2 Japan
        • 4.5.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.3 India
        • 4.5.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.3.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.4 South Korea
        • 4.5.6.4.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.4.2 Product
      • 4.5.6.5 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
        • 4.5.6.5.1 Application
        • 4.5.6.5.2 Product
  • 4.6 Rest-of-the-World
    • 4.6.1 Market
    • 4.6.2 Key Market Participants in Rest-of-the-World
    • 4.6.3 Business Drivers
    • 4.6.4 Business Challenges
    • 4.6.5 Application
    • 4.6.6 Product
      • 4.6.6.1 Brazil
        • 4.6.6.1.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.1.2 Product
      • 4.6.6.2 South Africa
        • 4.6.6.2.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.2.2 Product
      • 4.6.6.3 Others
        • 4.6.6.3.1 Application
        • 4.6.6.3.2 Product

5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

  • 5.1 Next Frontiers
  • 5.2 Geographic Assessment
    • 5.2.1 Indigo Ag, Inc.
      • 5.2.1.1 Overview
      • 5.2.1.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.1.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.1.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.1.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.1.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.1.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.2 Carbon Credit Capital, LLC.
      • 5.2.2.1 Overview
      • 5.2.2.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.2.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.2.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.2.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.2.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.2.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.3 Terra Global Capital
      • 5.2.3.1 Overview
      • 5.2.3.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.3.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.3.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.3.5 Key Partners
      • 5.2.3.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.4 South Pole
      • 5.2.4.1 Overview
      • 5.2.4.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.4.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.4.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.4.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.4.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.5 Nori, Inc.
      • 5.2.5.1 Overview
      • 5.2.5.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.5.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.5.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.5.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.5.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.5.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.6 The California Air Resources Board
      • 5.2.6.1 Overview
      • 5.2.6.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.6.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.6.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.6.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.6.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.6.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.7 Cargill, Incorporated
      • 5.2.7.1 Overview
      • 5.2.7.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.7.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.7.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.7.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.7.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.7.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.8 Regenerative Agriculture Alliance
      • 5.2.8.1 Overview
      • 5.2.8.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.8.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.8.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.8.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.8.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.8.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.9 Ecosystem Services Market Consortium
      • 5.2.9.1 Overview
      • 5.2.9.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.9.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.9.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.9.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.9.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.9.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.10 Bayer AG
      • 5.2.10.1 Overview
      • 5.2.10.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.10.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.10.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.10.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.10.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.10.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.11 3Degrees Group, Inc
      • 5.2.11.1 Overview
      • 5.2.11.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.11.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.11.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.11.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.11.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.12 NATUREOFFICE
      • 5.2.12.1 Overview
      • 5.2.12.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.12.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.12.4 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.12.5 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.12.6 Analyst View
    • 5.2.13 Climetrek
      • 5.2.13.1 Overview
      • 5.2.13.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.13.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.13.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.13.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.13.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.13.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.14 EKI Energy Services Ltd.
      • 5.2.14.1 Overview
      • 5.2.14.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.14.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.14.4 Key Clients/Partners
      • 5.2.14.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.14.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.14.7 Analyst View
    • 5.2.15 Finite Carbon Corporation
      • 5.2.15.1 Overview
      • 5.2.15.2 Project Portfolio
      • 5.2.15.3 Top Competitors
      • 5.2.15.4 Target Customers/End Users
      • 5.2.15.5 Key Personnel
      • 5.2.15.6 Key Partners
      • 5.2.15.7 Analyst View

6 Research Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources
    • 6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
    • 6.1.3 Data Triangulation
  • 6.2 Market Estimation and Forecast

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 2: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 3: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2025, 2027, and 2035
  • Figure 4: Key Events
  • Figure 5: Supply Chain and Risks within the Supply Chain
  • Figure 6: Average Pricing Scenario, 2024-2035
  • Figure 7: Patent Analysis (by Country), January 2021-March 2025
  • Figure 8: Patent Analysis (by Company), January 2021-March 2025
  • Figure 9: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 10: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 11: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 12: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 13: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 14: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 15: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 16: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 17: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 18: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 19: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Figure 20: Strategic Initiatives, 2020-2023
  • Figure 21: Share of Strategic Initiatives, January 2021-April 2024
  • Figure 22: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 23: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach
  • Figure 24: Assumptions and Limitations

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Market Snapshot
  • Table 2: Opportunities across Regions
  • Table 3: Trends Overview
  • Table 4: Regulatory and Policy Landscape
  • Table 5: Stakeholder Analysis
  • Table 6: Emerging Start-ups
  • Table 7: Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors, 2024-2034
  • Table 8: Startup and Investment Landscape
  • Table 9: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 10: Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Region), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 11: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 12: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 13: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 14: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 15: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 16: North America Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use) Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 17: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 18: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 19: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 20: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 21: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 22: U.S. Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 23: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 24: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 25: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 26: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 27: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 28: Canada Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 29: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 30: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 31: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 32: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 33: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 34: Mexico Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 35: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 36: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 37: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 38: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 39: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 40: Europe Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 41: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 42: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 43: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 44: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 45: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 46: Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 47: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 48: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 49: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 50: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 51: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 52: China Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 53: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 54: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 55: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 56: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 57: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 58: Japan Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 59: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 60: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 61: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 62: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 63: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 64: India Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 65: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 66: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 67: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 68: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 69: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 70: South Korea Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 71: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 72: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 73: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 74: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 75: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 76: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 77: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 78: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 79: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 80: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 81: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 82: Rest-of-the-World Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 83: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 84: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 85: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 86: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 87: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 88: Brazil Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use, Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 89: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 90: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 91: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 92: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 93: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 94: South Africa Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 95: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 96: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Application), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 97: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 98: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Project Type), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035
  • Table 99: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), $Million, 2024-2035
  • Table 100: Others Carbon Credits Market for Agriculture, Forestry, and Land Use (by Forestry and Land Use), Million Tons of CO2, 2024-2035