查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1837328

农产品生质塑胶市场（按类型、原料、报废产品和应用）－全球预测（2025-2032）

Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market by Type, Raw Material, End-of-Life, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 192 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2032 年，农产品生质塑胶市场将成长至 94.8 亿美元，复合年增长率为 16.13%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年2024年 28.6亿美元
预计2025年 33.1亿美元
预测年份：2032年 94.8亿美元
复合年增长率（%） 16.13%

全面介绍生质塑胶在农产品中的应用范围、目标和相关人员的优先事项，并推动其采用

本执行摘要概述了生质塑胶在农产品领域的前景，明确了其应用范围、目标以及决策者面临的关键策略挑战。摘要并非将生质塑胶定位为单一技术，而是将其定位为一系列与农业实践、包装系统和废弃物处理基础设施相互作用的聚合物解决方案。本摘要旨在提供简洁严谨的指导，帮助产业领导者评估其商业影响、采购途径和政策互动，并避免将永续性的空谈与技术可行性混为一谈。

分析由多种压力驱动：优先考虑循环性的监管变化、农场层面对成本效益和功能性材料的需求，以及下游对可证明的环境成果的需求。引言部分阐明了生物基原料、经证实可堆肥的生物聚合物以及针对特定降解机製而设计的材料之间的区别，并构成了研究中使用的术语。定义与对农业应用至关重要的实际性能属性相匹配，例如机械强度、抗紫外线、渗透性和降解时间。

最后，本节概述了相关人员的观点以及指导专家参与的调查方法。证据基础涵盖了农民、投入品供应商、包装加工商、认证机构、废弃物管理者等。引言部分综合了趋势、政策意涵、细分考量、区域动态、竞争行为和行动指南，旨在支援整个价值链的策略决策。

监管压力、加速聚合物创新和实际农场营运需求的变革性融合将再形成采用路径

在政策推动循环经济、生物聚合物化学技术日趋成熟以及农场层级营运需求不断演变的推动下，农产品正经历一场变革性转变。将采购与环境成果挂钩的立法以及堆肥基础设施的扩张，正在促使企业加大对可进行报废管理的材料的奖励，而私营部门的永续性承诺则正在放大整个供应链的需求信号。同时，科学进步，尤其是在脂肪族聚酯合成和原料转化效率方面的进步，正在改善传统上被视为权衡利弊的性能属性。

原料物流的改进和酵素辅助聚合技术的进步正在降低生产复杂性，而认证和标准的提高则增强了买家的信心。这些技术和监管趋势与农场实际运作相互交织，其中劳动力限制、机械化施用方法和作物保护措施决定了材料的选择。因此，采用新型聚合物不再是一对一地取代化石聚合物，而是更整合具有特定农艺功能的材料，例如覆盖、青贮保护和温室薄膜，同时实现循环利用。

这项转变需要整个价值链建立新的关係：供应伙伴需要展示可靠的报废途径，加工商需要调整其製程以适应生质塑胶的流变特性，零售商需要向生产商传达性能价值。随着这些要素的整合，该产业可能会出现策略试点计画、专注于满足用途性能的迭代产品重新设计，以及材料科学家和农学家之间更深入的合作，以确保田间有效性和环境永续性。

评估贸易政策对原料和树脂供应链的累积影响以及对采购和营运的策略影响

对于生质塑胶价值链上的企业而言，贸易政策环境是一个日益重要的变数。影响原料进口和聚合物成品的关税和贸易救济措施会带来新的成本和组织风险，其影响范围从采购部门蔓延到实际运作。随着关税的实施或调整，生产商和加工商会透过重新评估供应商关係、加速近岸外包或探索替代原材料路线来应对，以保持价格竞争力和供应的连续性。

在供应链薄弱或特种原料或中间树脂集中在少数几个出口国的情况下，关税的累积效应最为明显。为此，农用塑胶使用者正在扩大供应商，投资寻找国内树脂供应商，或优先考虑受贸易措施影响较小的聚合物类型。这些调整对营运产生了影响，例如，需要重新调整转换生产线以适应不同等级的树脂，库存策略转向增加安全库存，采购团队则提高供应商资格确认以减少对单一来源的依赖。

除了直接的成本影响外，关税还会影响垂直整合和长期采购伙伴关係关係的策略决策。企业越来越多地考虑采用包含价格上涨条款、远期采购策略以及共同投资国内加工能力的合约结构，以降低风险。因此，贸易政策不再是后勤部门合规问题，而是影响投资、伙伴关係以及农业生质塑胶解决方案规模化战术性蓝图的核心因素。

細項分析揭示了聚合物类别、原料来源、最终使用途径和农业应用如何决定价值和风险

严格的细分视角揭示了生质塑胶市场中的机会和限制。产品类型涵盖脂肪族聚酯（例如Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate、Polybutylene Succinate、聚羟基烷酯脂肪酸酯和聚乳酸），以及生物聚乙烯、纤维素基生质塑胶、蛋白质基生质塑胶和淀粉基生质塑胶。每种材料类别在机械性能、降解机制以及与现有转化设备的兼容性方面都存在差异，这决定了其应用适用性和价格敏感性。脂肪族聚酯尤其具有多种配方，可实现可调的拉伸强度、伸长率和降解控制，使其成为地膜和可降解包装的理想材料。

原料多样性塑造了韧性和永续性。木薯、玉米粉、马铃薯、甘蔗、柳枝稷和小麦等原料在农艺足迹、土地利用影响和季节性供应模式方面各不相同。原料选择会影响供应链风险以及作物碳和水会计。虽然拥有成熟物流的物流作物具有采购优势，但随着转化技术的规模化，多年生和纤维素原料将带来更长期的永续性。因此，原料供应与转化经济性之间的相互作用指南了商业性优先顺序的决定。

报废产品的分类（可生物降解、可堆肥、可光降解）决定了环境结果和基础设施需求。当工业或农场堆肥系统存在且管理得当时，可堆肥材料可以实现有意义的循环利用。另一方面，可光降解配方适用于某些表面应用，但需要不同的环境权衡。最后，温室、灌溉系统、覆盖、包装、青贮饲料储存和隧道等应用都需要适当的材料特性和报废策略。根据每种应用的功能需求选择合适的聚合物，可以提高性能、降低现场废品率，并提高永续性声明的可信度。

区域比较分析显示管理体制、基础设施准备和供应链接接近性如何影响采用轨迹

区域动态揭示了不同的采用路径，取决于管理体制、供应网络和报废基础设施的成熟度。在美洲，政策倡议和企业采购标准正在推动对可验证堆肥解决方案的需求，而强大的农业服务网络和积极主动的转换器则使实际试验和迭代放大成为可能。对物流的投资以及接近性原料产地的地理位置也推动了对淀粉基脂肪族聚酯产品的实验，这些产品既能满足功能性要求，又能满足处置要求。

在欧洲、中东和非洲，严格的法规和标籤要求往往为环保声明设定了高门槛，迫使供应商优先考虑第三方认证和透明的生命週期证据。同时，该地区基础设施的差异也意味着采用率不平衡。有些市场拥有完善的堆肥和废弃物收集系统，而有些市场则需要农场或分散式解决方案，这限制了其选择范围，使其仅限于适合当地情况的材料。然而，该地区部分地区的政策领导正在推动创新和官民合作关係，以应对报废产品的复杂问题。

在亚太地区，快速的工业发展和庞大的农业部门为供需双方创造了优势，而靠近原料种植地的优势也使其能够实现垂直整合。然而，法规环境和废弃物管理系统的成熟度各不相同，迫使製造商和买家设计出切实可行的、适合当地情况的解决方案。在每个地区，供应链的弹性、认证的清晰度以及营运的适宜性都是决定哪些生质塑胶应用将率先普及的关键因素。

强调产品检验、供应整合和可信赖认证的企业策略和竞争行动将加速采用

活跃于农产品生质塑胶领域的公司正透过产品创新、供应链整合和认证策略的结合来脱颖而出。市场领导者专注于田间条件下的可验证性能，并投资于特定应用的测试，例如地膜、温室覆盖物和青贮饲料保护，以减少产品故障并增强种植者的信心。各公司也寻求垂直合作，将原料生产商、转化设施和废弃物管理合作伙伴连接起来，以创建端到端的价值提案，涵盖技术性能和处置途径。

策略行动包括与学术机构建立有针对性的研发合作伙伴关係，以改进聚合物配方，从而满足耐用性和可预测的用后降解双重目标。一些公司正在采用模组化製造方法，以实现快速再製造，并根据当地基础设施为客户提供不同的处置方案。其他公司则专注于利用区块链和数位标籤来扩展认证和可追溯性，以向B2B买家和监管机构证实其永续性声明。

这些公司的投资重点通常集中在製程优化以提高转换率、品质保证通讯协定以减少田间故障，以及与大型生产商和合作社进行商业试点以检验应用的经济性和操作相容性。能够将技术可靠性与下游服务（例如产品回收、堆肥伙伴关係以及简化种植者采用的农场咨询服务）相结合的公司将获得竞争优势。

为领导者提供可行的建议，透​​过结合实际试点、多样化采购、标准参与和采购创新来扩展解决方案。

产业领导者应采取务实的行动组合，将短期商业性可行性与长期系统改革结合。首先，优先进行初步试验，使聚合物选择与作物和设施实际情况相符。其次，拓宽原料筹资策略，减少对单一来源的依赖，并重视与区域生产商的伙伴关係，以确保可预测的供应，同时提高可追溯性和永续性指标。

第三，积极与标准组织和市政堆肥业者合作，确保原料规范转化为实际的最终结果。在工业堆肥资源匮乏的地方，与农业合作社合作开发或支持分散式堆肥试点计画。第四，建构采购合同，透过共同创新协议、试点成本分摊以及鼓励耐用性和可预测劣化的绩效共用担保，与供应商共担风险。第五，利用数位证明工具增强供应链透明度，以支援认证声明并快速回应监管询问。

最后，我们整合内部商业性奖励、培训和客户教育，以便我们的销售团队、农艺顾问和技术服务负责人能够有效传达农艺效益和正确的处置途径。将严谨的营运与政策参与以及对基础设施伙伴关係的有针对性的投资相结合，可以显着提高成功扩大规模的几率，同时保护品牌完整性和农场生产力。

透明的调查方法，描述分析中使用的专家访谈、文献综合、供应链映射和检验通讯协定

调查方法整合了原厂药研究和二手资料研究，并采用结构化检验通讯协定，以确保分析的严谨性和有效性。原厂药研究包括对价值链上相关人员的半结构化访谈，包括生产商、聚合物科学家、转化商、废弃物处理商和认证机构。访谈重点在于农业环境下的绩效预期、物流限制以及各种报废途径的营运影响。二手资料研究则查阅了同行评审文献、政策文件、标准文件和公司披露文件，以检验技术声明并记录监管动态。

我们采用混合方法对资料进行汇总。对专家访谈中获得的定性资讯进行编码，以识别反覆出现的主题和营运痛点。分析技术规格和产品测试结果，以比较不同用例的材料性能。利用供应链图谱来描绘替代采购场景中的物料流、临界点和潜在瓶颈。检验包括与独立废弃物管理供应商交叉核对声明，并在有公开数据的情况下核对农艺测试结果。

调查方法强调假设和证据选择标准的透明度，我们的分析框架优先考虑功能契合度、供应弹性和报废产品可行性作为核心维度，并且我们记录了局限性和进一步研究的领域，以指南后续研究、试点设计和个人咨询。

策略结论综合了实际需要，以协调技术、政策、采购和基础设施，实现持久采用

结论强调，农产品使用的生质塑胶并非传统聚合物的单一替代品，而是一套技术多样且具有战略重要性的解决方案。生质塑胶的成功取决于聚合物的选择是否与作物功能相符，报废途径是否与当地基础设施相符，以及贸易措施和原材料集中带来的供应链风险的管理。实际的初步试验、产品的迭代改进以及在认证和物流的投资，这些投资将增强买家信心并提高营运相容性，从而推动生物塑胶的应用。

长期的可扩展性将取决于转化技术的持续创新、堆肥和有机废弃物基础设施的扩展，以及能够最大程度减少对土地利用负面影响的原料供应链的发展。只要产业持续投资于透明的证据和伙伴关係关係，将技术设计与农场实际情况联繫起来，那么奖励可证明的循环性的政策和采购信号将加速整合：在现实环境中进行测试、记录结果，并设计共用担风险同时奖励持续改进的合约框架。

综合起来，这些见解表明，生质塑胶可以为农业综合企业的永续性目标做出有意义的贡献，但前提是技术、政策、采购和基础设施协同发展，以应对扩大规模的实际挑战。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概况

第五章 市场洞察

  • 农民正在采用添加了紫外线稳定剂的聚乳酸地膜来长期保护作物。
  • 相关企业正在转向可堆肥的生质塑胶育苗盘，以最大限度地减少温室废弃物和体力劳动。
  • 由淀粉基聚合物製成的可生物降解滴灌管可减少微塑胶的释放
  • 几丁聚醣衍生的生质塑胶用作土壤改良剂时，可提高保水性和快速生物降解性。
  • 生质塑胶创新者与农业化学公司就营养注入作物薄膜建立策略伙伴关係
  • 对具有可调节孔隙度和控释施肥能力的生物基温室覆盖物的需求正在上升
  • 实施农业生质塑胶包装的封闭回路型工业堆肥，实现零掩埋目标

第六章：2025年美国关税的累积影响

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章农产品生质塑胶市场（按类型）

  • 脂肪族聚酯
    • Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate（PBAT）
    • Polybutylene Succinate（PBS）
    • 聚羟基烷酯（PHA）
    • 聚乳酸（PLA）
  • 生物聚乙烯
  • 纤维素生质塑胶
  • 蛋白质基生物生质塑胶
  • 淀粉基生质塑胶

第九章农产品生质塑胶市场（按原始材料）

  • 木薯
  • 玉米粉
  • 马铃薯
  • 甘蔗
  • 柳枝稷
  • 小麦

第十章农产品生质塑胶的市场末期

  • 可生物降解
  • 可堆肥
  • 光降解

第 11 章农产品生质塑胶市场（按应用）

  • 温室
  • 灌溉
  • 多
  • 包裹
  • 青贮饲料储存
  • 隧道

第十二章农产品生质塑胶市场（按地区）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章农产品生质塑胶市场（按类别）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 各国农产品生质塑胶市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章 竞争格局

  • 2024年市占率分析
  • 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
  • 竞争分析
    • BASF SE
    • Bio-On SpA
    • Biome Bioplastics Limited.
    • Carbios
    • Danimer Scientific
    • Eastman Chemical Company
    • FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
    • Futamura Group.
    • GC International by PTT Global Chemical PLC
    • Good Natured Products Inc.
    • Green Dot Bioplastics, Inc.
    • Kuraray Co., Ltd.
    • Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
    • Natur-Tec by Northern Technologies International Corporation
    • NatureWorks LLC by Cargill, Incorporated
    • Novamont SpA by Versalis SpA
    • Polymateria Ltd.
    • Roquette Freres
    • TIPA Corp Ltd.
    • TotalEnergies Corbion bv
    • UrthPact, LLC
Product Code: MRR-035E48038160

The Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market is projected to grow by USD 9.48 billion at a CAGR of 16.13% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 2.86 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 3.31 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 9.48 billion
CAGR (%) 16.13%

Comprehensive introduction that frames bioplastics for agribusiness by defining scope, objectives, and cross-stakeholder priorities driving adoption

This executive summary introduces the landscape of bioplastics within the agribusiness sector, defining scope, purpose, and the strategic questions that matter to decision makers. It situates bioplastics not as a single technology but as a portfolio of polymer solutions interacting with agronomic practices, packaging systems, and end-of-life infrastructures. The objective is to provide a concise but rigorous orientation that helps industry leaders evaluate operational implications, procurement pathways, and policy interactions without conflating sustainability rhetoric with technical feasibility.

The context for this analysis emerges from converging pressures: regulatory shifts that prioritize circularity, farm-level needs for cost-effective and functional materials, and downstream demands for demonstrable environmental outcomes. The introduction frames the terminology used throughout the study, clarifying distinctions among bio-based feedstocks, biopolymers with compostable certification, and materials engineered for specific degradation mechanisms. Definitions are paired with the practical performance attributes-mechanical strength, UV resistance, permeability, and degradation timelines-that matter for agronomic use cases.

Finally, this section outlines stakeholder perspectives and the methodological approach that guided expert engagement. Farmers, input suppliers, packaging converters, certification bodies, and waste managers are all included in the evidence base. The introduction closes by setting expectations: the subsequent sections synthesize trends, policy impacts, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive behavior, and actionable guidance intended to support strategic decisions across the value chain.

Transformative convergence of regulatory pressure, accelerated polymer innovations, and pragmatic farm operational needs reshaping adoption pathways

Agribusiness is experiencing transformative shifts driven by policy momentum toward circularity, technological maturation of biopolymer chemistry, and evolving operational imperatives at the farm level. Legislation that ties procurement to environmental outcomes and expands composting infrastructure is tilting incentives in favor of materials designed for end-of-life management, while private sector sustainability commitments are amplifying demand signals across the supply chain. At the same time, scientific advances-particularly in aliphatic polyester synthesis and in feedstock conversion efficiency-are improving performance characteristics previously seen as tradeoffs relative to conventional polymers.

Convergence dynamics are notable: improvements in feedstock logistics and enzyme-assisted polymerization techniques are reducing production complexity, while parallel gains in certification and standards are increasing buyer confidence. These technological and regulatory currents are intersecting with operational realities on farms, where labor constraints, mechanized application methods, and crop protection practices shape material selection. Consequently, adoption is less about replacing fossil polymers one-for-one and more about integrating materials that deliver specific agronomic functions-such as mulching, silage protection, or greenhouse films-while enabling circular disposal pathways.

This shift requires new relationships across the value chain. Supply partners must demonstrate credible end-of-life pathways, converters need to adapt processes to bioplastic rheologies, and retailers must convey performance value to growers. As these components align, the sector will see more strategic pilots, iterative product redesigns focused on fit-for-purpose performance, and deeper collaboration between material scientists and agronomists to ensure field effectiveness and environmental integrity.

Assessment of cumulative trade policy effects on feedstock and resin supply chains and their strategic implications for procurement and operations

The trade policy environment has become an increasingly significant variable for companies operating across the bioplastics value chain. Tariff measures and trade remedies affecting feedstock imports and finished polymer goods introduce new layers of cost and organizational risk that reverberate from sourcing desks to field operations. When duties are applied or altered, producers and converters respond by re-evaluating supplier relationships, accelerating nearshoring efforts, or seeking alternative feedstock routes to preserve price competitiveness and continuity of supply.

The cumulative effect of tariff actions is most pronounced where supply chains are thin or where specialized feedstocks and intermediate resins are concentrated in a limited set of exporting countries. In response, agricultural plastics users may widen their supplier pools, invest in qualification of domestic resin sources, or prioritize polymer types less exposed to trade measures. These adjustments have operational implications: conversion lines may require retooling to accommodate different resin grades; inventory strategies shift toward larger safety stocks; and procurement teams intensify supplier qualification to reduce single-source dependencies.

Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs can influence strategic decisions about vertical integration and long-term sourcing partnerships. Firms are increasingly considering contractual structures that include price escalation clauses, forward buying strategies, or co-investment in domestic processing capacity to mitigate exposure. As a result, trade policy is no longer a back-office compliance matter but a central element shaping investment, partnership formation, and the tactical roadmap for scaling bioplastic solutions in agriculture.

Segmentation analysis illuminating how polymer classes, feedstock origins, end-of-life pathways, and agronomic applications determine value and risk

A rigorous segmentation lens clarifies where opportunities and constraints concentrate across the bioplastics landscape. Product types span aliphatic polyesters such as polybutylene adipate terephthalate, polybutylene succinate, polyhydroxyalkanoates, and polylactic acid, alongside biopolyethylene, cellulose-based bioplastics, protein-based bioplastics, and starch-based bioplastics. Each material class presents a distinct balance of mechanical properties, degradability mechanisms, and compatibility with existing conversion equipment, which informs application fit and price sensitivity. In particular, the aliphatic polyester family offers a range of formulations that can be tuned for tensile strength, elongation, and controlled degradation, making them attractive for mulch films and degradable packaging.

Feedstock diversity shapes resilience and sustainability narratives. Raw materials such as cassava, corn starch, potato, sugarcane, switchgrass, and wheat carry different agronomic footprints, land-use implications, and seasonal supply patterns. Feedstock choice affects not only the carbon and water accounting of a product but also supply chain risk: commodity crops with established logistics offer procurement advantages, while perennial or cellulosic feedstocks present longer-term sustainability upside if conversion technologies scale. The interplay between feedstock availability and conversion economics will therefore guide commercial prioritization.

End-of-life classifications-biodegradable, compostable, and photodegradable-determine both environmental outcomes and infrastructure requirements. Compostable materials can deliver meaningful circularity where industrial or on-farm composting systems exist and are managed correctly, whereas photodegradable formulations are useful for specific surface applications but carry different environmental tradeoffs. Finally, application contexts such as greenhouses, irrigation systems, mulch, packaging, silage storage, and tunnels each demand tailored material properties and end-of-life strategies. Aligning polymer selection with the functional requirements of each application yields better performance, reduces failure rates in the field, and improves the credibility of sustainability claims.

Regional comparative analysis showing how regulatory regimes, infrastructure readiness, and supply chain proximity shape adoption trajectories

Regional dynamics reveal differentiated adoption pathways driven by regulatory regimes, supply networks, and the maturity of end-of-life infrastructures. In the Americas, policy initiatives and corporate procurement standards are raising demand for demonstrably compostable solutions, while strong agricultural service networks and active converters enable practical trials and iterative scaling. Investment in logistics and proximity to feedstock sources also supports experimentation with starch-based and aliphatic polyester products that can meet both functional and disposal-related expectations.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and labeling requirements often set a high bar for environmental claims, prompting suppliers to prioritize third-party certification and transparent life cycle evidence. At the same time, infrastructure variability across the region means that adoption is uneven: some markets have well-developed composting and waste collection systems, whereas others require on-farm or decentralized solutions that limit options to materials suited to those contexts. Policy leadership in parts of the region can, however, catalyze innovation and public-private partnerships that address end-of-life complexity.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrial build-out and large agricultural sectors create both demand and supply advantages, with proximity to feedstock cultivation enabling vertically integrated approaches. However, heterogeneous regulatory environments and differing maturity of waste management systems mean that manufacturers and buyers must design solutions that are practically deployable in local conditions. Across all regions, supply chain resilience, clarity of certification, and operational fit are the primary determinants of which bioplastic applications gain traction first.

Corporate strategies and competitive behaviors emphasizing product validation, supply integration, and credible certification to accelerate adoption

Companies active in the agribusiness bioplastics domain are differentiating through a combination of product innovation, supply chain integration, and certification strategies. Market leaders emphasize demonstrable performance in field conditions, investing in application-specific testing for mulch films, greenhouse covers, and silage protection to reduce product failure and build grower confidence. Firms are also pursuing vertical collaborations that link feedstock growers, conversion facilities, and waste management partners to create end-to-end value propositions that address both technical performance and disposal pathways.

Strategic behaviors include targeted R&D partnerships with academic institutions to advance polymer formulations that meet dual objectives of durability during use and predictable degradation post-use. Some companies are adopting modular manufacturing approaches that enable rapid reformulation and allow customers to choose different end-of-life outcomes based on local infrastructure. Others focus on scaling certification and traceability, using blockchain or digital tagging to substantiate sustainability claims to B2B purchasers and regulators.

Investment priorities among these firms typically center on process optimization to improve conversion yields, on quality assurance protocols that reduce field failures, and on commercial pilots with large growers or cooperatives to validate application economics and operational compatibility. Competitive advantage accrues to those that can integrate technical credibility with downstream service offerings such as product take-back, composting partnerships, or on-farm advisory services that simplify adoption for growers.

Actionable recommendations for leaders to combine pragmatic pilots, diversified sourcing, standards engagement, and procurement innovation to scale solutions

Industry leaders should pursue a pragmatic portfolio of actions that combine near-term commercial viability with longer-term systems change. First, prioritize application pilots that align polymer selection with crop and equipment realities; invest resources in field validation studies that quantify performance under representative seasonality and mechanization regimes. Second, broaden feedstock sourcing strategies to reduce single-source exposure and evaluate partnerships with regional growers to secure predictable supply while improving traceability and sustainability metrics.

Third, engage proactively with standards bodies and municipal composting operators to ensure that material specifications translate into real-world end-of-life outcomes; where industrial composting is scarce, develop or support decentralized composting pilots linked to agricultural co-ops. Fourth, structure procurement contracts to share risk with suppliers through collaborative innovation agreements, pilot cost-sharing, and performance-linked warranties that incentivize durability and predictable degradation. Fifth, strengthen supply chain transparency using digital provenance tools to support certification claims and to respond rapidly to regulatory inquiries.

Finally, align internal commercial incentives, training, and customer education so that sales teams, agronomy advisors, and technical service personnel can communicate both agronomic benefits and correct disposal pathways. Combining operational rigor with policy engagement and targeted investment in infrastructure partnerships will materially increase the probability of successful scaling while protecting brand integrity and farm productivity.

Transparent research methodology describing expert interviews, literature synthesis, supply chain mapping, and validation protocols used in the analysis

The research methodology integrates primary and secondary evidence with a structured validation protocol to ensure analytical rigor and relevance. Primary research consisted of semi-structured interviews with stakeholders across the value chain, including growers, polymer scientists, converters, waste management operators, and certification bodies. Interviews focused on performance expectations in agricultural contexts, logistical constraints, and the operational implications of different end-of-life pathways. Secondary research involved a review of peer-reviewed literature, policy texts, standards documentation, and company disclosures to triangulate technical claims and to document regulatory trends.

Data synthesis employed a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative inputs from expert interviews were coded to identify recurring themes and operational pain points, while technical specifications and product test results were analyzed to compare material performance across use cases. Supply chain mapping was used to depict feedstock flows, conversion points, and potential bottlenecks under alternative sourcing scenarios. Validation included cross-checking claims with independent waste management operators and with agronomic trial outcomes where public data were available.

The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and in the selection criteria for included evidence, and the analytical framework prioritized functional fit, supply resiliency, and end-of-life feasibility as core dimensions. Limitations and areas for further research were documented to guide follow-on studies, pilot designs, and tailored consulting engagements.

Strategic conclusion synthesizing practical imperatives for aligning technology, policy, procurement, and infrastructure to enable durable adoption

The concluding synthesis underscores that bioplastics for agribusiness represent a technologically diverse and strategically consequential set of solutions rather than a single substitute for conventional polymers. Success depends on aligning polymer selection with agronomic function, matching end-of-life pathways to local infrastructure, and managing supply chain risks introduced by trade measures and feedstock concentration. Adoption will progress through pragmatic pilots, iterative product refinement, and investments in certification and logistics that build buyer confidence and operational compatibility.

Longer-term scalability hinges on continued innovation in conversion technologies, expansion of composting and organic waste infrastructure, and the development of feedstock supply chains that minimize adverse land-use impacts. Policy and procurement signals that reward demonstrable circularity will accelerate integration, provided the industry continues to invest in transparent evidence and in partnerships that bridge technical design with on-farm realities. For stakeholders seeking to act, the enduring imperative is to pair ambition with operational discipline-testing in realistic settings, documenting outcomes, and designing contractual frameworks that share risk while creating incentives for continuous improvement.

Taken together, these insights point to a path where bioplastics meaningfully contribute to agribusiness sustainability objectives, but only if technology, policy, procurement, and infrastructure evolve in concert to address the practical challenges of deployment at scale.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Farmers adopt polylactic acid mulch films fortified with UV stabilizers for extended crop protection
  • 5.2. Agribusinesses transition to compostable bioplastic seedling trays to minimize greenhouse waste and manual labor
  • 5.3. Development of biodegradable drip irrigation tubing made from starch-based polymers reduces microplastic runoff
  • 5.4. Use of chitosan-derived bioplastics as soil amendment wraps enhances moisture retention and rapid biodegradation
  • 5.5. Strategic partnerships between bioplastic innovators and agrochemical firms for nutrient-infused crop films
  • 5.6. Rising demand for bio-based greenhouse covers with tunable porosity and controlled release fertilization capabilities
  • 5.7. Implementation of closed-loop industrial composting for agricultural bioplastic packaging to achieve zero landfill goals

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Aliphatic Polyesters
    • 8.1.1. Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate (PBAT)
    • 8.1.2. Polybutylene Succinate (PBS)
    • 8.1.3. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
    • 8.1.4. Polylactic Acid (PLA)
  • 8.2. Biopolyethylene
  • 8.3. Cellulose-Based Bioplastics
  • 8.4. Protein-Based Bioplastics
  • 8.5. Starch-Based Bioplastics

9. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Raw Material

  • 9.1. Cassava
  • 9.2. Corn starch
  • 9.3. Potato
  • 9.4. Sugarcane
  • 9.5. Switchgrass
  • 9.6. Wheat

10. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by End-of-Life

  • 10.1. Biodegradable
  • 10.2. Compostable
  • 10.3. Photodegradable

11. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Greenhouses
  • 11.2. Irrigation
  • 11.3. Mulch
  • 11.4. Packaging
  • 11.5. Silage Storage
  • 11.6. Tunnels

12. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Bioplastics for Agribusiness Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. BASF SE
    • 15.3.2. Bio-On SpA
    • 15.3.3. Biome Bioplastics Limited.
    • 15.3.4. Carbios
    • 15.3.5. Danimer Scientific
    • 15.3.6. Eastman Chemical Company
    • 15.3.7. FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
    • 15.3.8. Futamura Group.
    • 15.3.9. GC International by PTT Global Chemical PLC
    • 15.3.10. Good Natured Products Inc.
    • 15.3.11. Green Dot Bioplastics, Inc.
    • 15.3.12. Kuraray Co., Ltd.
    • 15.3.13. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
    • 15.3.14. Natur-Tec by Northern Technologies International Corporation
    • 15.3.15. NatureWorks LLC by Cargill, Incorporated
    • 15.3.16. Novamont S.p.A. by Versalis SpA
    • 15.3.17. Polymateria Ltd.
    • 15.3.18. Roquette Freres
    • 15.3.19. TIPA Corp Ltd.
    • 15.3.20. TotalEnergies Corbion bv
    • 15.3.21. UrthPact, LLC

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. G7 BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. NATO BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 28. BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE (PBAT), BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE (PBS), BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHA), BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID (PLA), BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPOLYETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CELLULOSE-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PROTEIN-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CASSAVA, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY CORN STARCH, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY POTATO, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUGARCANE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SWITCHGRASS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY WHEAT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY BIODEGRADABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COMPOSTABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PHOTODEGRADABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GREENHOUSES, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY IRRIGATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY MULCH, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SILAGE STORAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TUNNELS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. AMERICAS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NORTH AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. LATIN AMERICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. EUROPE BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. MIDDLE EAST BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. AFRICA BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. ASIA-PACIFIC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. GLOBAL BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 267. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 268. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 269. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 270. ASEAN BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 271. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 272. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 273. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 274. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 275. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 276. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 277. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 278. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 279. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 280. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 281. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 282. GCC BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 283. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 284. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 285. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 286. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 287. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 288. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 289. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 290. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 291. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 292. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY END-OF-LIFE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 293. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 294. EUROPEAN UNION BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 295. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 296. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 297. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 298. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 299. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 300. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC POLYESTERS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 301. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MARKET SIZE, BY RAW MATERIAL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 302. BRICS BIOPLASTICS FOR AGRIBUSINESS MAR