查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1912053

按产量、产品类型、应用和最终用途苛性钠和尿素市场－2026年至2032年全球预测

Caustic Soda & Urea Market by Production, Type, Application, End-Use - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 194 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，苛性钠和尿素市场价值将达到 159.5 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长到 167.3 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 230 亿美元，年复合成长率为 5.36%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 159.5亿美元
预计年份：2026年 167.3亿美元
预测年份 2032 230亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 5.36%

本文简要概述了苛性钠和尿素如何支持重要的工业和农业价值链，并构成生产和采购的战略重点。

由苛性钠（氢氧化钠）和尿素组成的工业化学品复合体在从氧化铝、纸浆和造纸到化肥和动物饲料等多个供应链中发挥着至关重要的作用。苛性钠在化学製造中用作製程试剂和清洁剂，而尿素是农业中重要的氮源，也是化学合成中用途广泛的原料。它们共同将上游能源和原材料趋势与下游製造业和农业生产力联繫起来，形成了一种结构，使得这两种产品都受到商品週期、管理体制和不断变化的永续性要求的影响。

技术创新、脱碳和数位转型如何交织融合，重塑苛性钠和尿素价值链的生产经济效益和竞争优势？

过去几年，苛性钠和尿素产业的结构正在重塑。这些结构性变化包括能源转型势在必行、电解和薄膜技术的进步，以及对循环经济和排放的重新关注。电气化和绿色氢能的经济效益正在加速对低碳氨和尿素生产过程的投资，而氯碱膜电解槽的改进则凭藉更高的能源效率和更低的环境影响，对传统的隔膜和汞基製程构成了挑战。这些技术变革正在改变现有生产商的资本配置和垂直整合策略。

分析关税政策波动对苛性钠和尿素供应网络贸易流量、筹资策略和供应链韧性的影响

对关键化工产品进口征收或提高关税，将对国内供应链、筹资策略和下游定价结构产生多方面的影响。关税鼓励国内投资，并加速氯碱和氨尿素等设备的现代化改造，以满足回升的需求。同时，依赖进口的製造业和农业消费者面临短期投入成本上涨的局面。实际上，企业因应措施包括将成本转嫁给消费者、重新谈判长期采购合约以及实现供应商网路多元化，以降低风险敞口。

透过可操作的細項分析，揭示苛性钠和尿素价值链中按应用、形态、等级、最终用途和销售管道分類的差异化需求讯号。

市场区隔有助于了解需求模式、价格波动和产品差异化，从而提供可操作的营运观点。苛性钠市场按应用、终端用户产业、形态、产品类型、纯度和销售管道进行评估。应用领域涵盖氧化铝生产、化学品製造、纸浆和造纸、肥皂和清洁剂以及水处理。在纸浆和造纸业，进一步细分为牛皮纸浆、机械浆和再生浆，再细分为漂白牛皮纸浆和未漂白牛皮纸浆，突显了由製程化学和监管限制驱动的苛性钠需求差异。终端用户产业（包括化学、冶金、石油、纸浆和造纸以及水处理）的趋势不仅影响销量，也影响所需的等级和交付频率。

美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域趋势和需求因素将影响生产策略、物流和监管风险。

区域趋势对生产者、贸易商和终端用户的策略选择有显着影响。美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区各自拥有独特的需求驱动因素和营运现实。在美洲，农业需求模式和相对整合的国内工业基础塑造了筹资策略。接近性原材料产地和物流网络有利于大规模分销模式，但政策变化和关税因素可能会迅速改变采购偏好和投资前景。

资产柔软性、垂直整合、技术投资和伙伴关係策略塑造了苛性钠和尿素生产商及供应商之间的竞争优势。

在苛性钠和尿素领域，企业的竞争地位日益取决于资产柔软性、上游原料的所有权以及投资脱碳的能力。能够充分利用氨生产和尿素合成之间的协同效应，或将氯碱业务与下游衍生相结合的垂直整合型生产商，可受益于成本优化和商业性控制；而专业的供应商和经销商透过服务、配方技术和区域物流网络创造价值，从而减少终端客户的摩擦。

为增强竞争力而采取的可行策略措施：加强供应链韧性、重点资本投资、实现商业性差异化以及整合政策因应措施

产业领导者应采取平衡策略，将短期应对措施与中长期转型倡议结合。首先，透过多元化合约和策略性避险来保障原物料和能源供应，以降低投入价格波动和政策变化带来的风险。资本计划应优先考虑能够显着提高能源效率和排放的技术升级，例如膜电解槽维修和氨厂脱碳方案，并使营运绩效与不断变化的法规和客户期望保持一致。

采用稳健的调查方法，结合一手访谈、实地技术审核和二手资料三角验证，得出检验的策略见解和假设。

本调查方法融合了一手资料和二手资料，以确保研究结果的稳健性和实用性。一手资料包括对化学和农业领域的工厂运营人员、商务经理、经销商和大型终端用户进行结构化访谈。现场考察和流程审核为生产技术和效率的技术评估奠定了基础。二手资料则整合了监管文件、贸易流量数据、氯碱和氨尿素工艺的技术文献以及公开的采购和物流信息，以更好地理解一手资料的研究结果。

关键策略建议整合了韧性、脱碳和细分主导的商业性方法，以指导业务决策。

苛性钠和尿素市场正受到技术、政策和商业性因素的共同影响而重组。在这个产业变革时期中，优先考虑製程效率、低碳发展路径和细分商业模式的生产者和买家将获得更大的相对价值。原料采购和物流的柔软性，以及​​对生产现代化进行有针对性的投资，是降低风险和维持利润率的直接措施。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 依生产方法苛性钠和尿素市场

  • 膜电极法
  • 隔膜细胞法

第九章 按类型苛性钠和尿素市场

  • 固体的
  • 液体

第十章 依应用分類的苛性钠和尿素市场

  • 水处理
  • 纺织业
  • 肥皂和清洁剂
  • 纸浆和造纸
  • 有机化学品製造
  • 无机化学製造
  • 氧化铝/铝提炼

第十一章 依最终用途苛性钠和尿素市场

  • 化工
  • 汽车/排放气体控制
  • 饲料
  • 农业

第十二章 各地区的苛性钠和尿素市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章苛性钠和尿素市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 各国苛性钠及尿素市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章：美国苛性钠和尿素市场

第十六章 中国苛性钠与尿素市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
  • DCM Shriram Ltd.
  • Dow Inc.
  • EuroChem Group AG
  • FMC Corporation
  • Formosa Plastics Corporation
  • Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
  • INEOS Group Limited
  • Nutrien Ltd
  • OCI NV
  • Olin Corporation
  • Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
  • Yara International ASA
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13938

The Caustic Soda & Urea Market was valued at USD 15.95 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 16.73 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.36%, reaching USD 23.00 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 15.95 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 16.73 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 23.00 billion
CAGR (%) 5.36%

A concise overview of how caustic soda and urea underpin critical industrial and agricultural value chains and shape strategic priorities across production and procurement

The industrial chemicals complex comprising caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) and urea occupies a foundational role across multiple supply chains, spanning alumina and pulp and paper to fertilizer and animal feed. While caustic soda functions as both a process reagent and cleaning agent in chemical manufacturing, urea represents a cornerstone nitrogen source in agriculture and a versatile feedstock in chemical synthesis. Together they bridge upstream energy and feedstock dynamics with downstream manufacturing and agricultural productivity, exposing both products to commodity cycles, regulatory regimes, and evolving sustainability imperatives.

This introduction frames the dual-product landscape through a lens of interconnected drivers: energy and feedstock cost variability, technology transitions in production, regulatory and environmental obligations, and end-user demand elasticity. Strategic decision-makers must therefore consider not only discrete supply-side mechanics but also the cross-commodity effects that link chlor-alkali operations with ammonia synthesis pathways that feed urea production. The remainder of this analysis synthesizes these dynamics into actionable perspectives for executives and investors operating across the value chain.

How technology, decarbonization, and digital transformation are intersecting to redefine production economics and competitive advantage across caustic soda and urea value chains

The last several years have produced structural shifts that are reshaping the caustic soda and urea landscape: energy transition imperatives, advances in electrolytic and membrane technologies, and a renewed focus on circularity and emissions reduction. Electrification and the economics of green hydrogen are accelerating investment consideration in low-carbon ammonia and urea pathways, while improvements in chlor-alkali membrane cells are challenging legacy diaphragm and mercury-based processes by offering better energy efficiency and lower environmental liability. Those technological inflections are altering capital allocation and vertical integration strategies for incumbent producers.

Simultaneously, digitalization across chemical plant operations, from process analytics to predictive maintenance, is enhancing throughput and reducing downtime, thereby changing operational benchmarks. On the demand side, shifting consumer preferences and tighter environmental standards in water treatment, pulp and paper bleaching, and detergents are increasing the premium for higher-purity grades and sustainable provenance. These transformative dynamics are not isolated; rather they interact and compound, creating a landscape in which agility, technology adoption, and integrated supply strategies determine competitive advantage.

An analysis of how tariff policy shifts influence trade flows, procurement strategies, and supply chain resilience across caustic soda and urea supply networks

The imposition or augmentation of tariffs on key chemical imports creates layered consequences for domestic supply chains, procurement strategies, and downstream pricing structures. Tariffs can incentivize onshore investment, prompting accelerated modernization of chlor-alkali and ammonia-urea assets to capture reshored demand; conversely, they can increase short-term input costs for manufacturers and agricultural consumers that remain reliant on imported volumes. In practice, firms respond through cost pass-through to customers, renegotiation of long-term purchase agreements, and diversification of supplier networks to mitigate exposure.

Beyond direct price effects, tariffs catalyze adjustments in trade flows and inventory behavior. Buyers may shift toward longer-term contracting and increased safety stocks to smooth volatility arising from policy shifts. Suppliers with flexible logistics and multiple production baseloads gain relative advantage, while those tied to single export channels face elevated commercial risk. Companies that proactively reconfigure supply chains-by developing regional distribution hubs, securing feedstock agreements, and accelerating process efficiency projects-will be better positioned to absorb tariff-related disruption and preserve margins without sacrificing market access.

Practical segmentation insights that reveal differentiated demand signals across application, form, grade, end-use, and sales channels for caustic soda and urea value chains

Segmentation provides the operational lens through which demand patterns, pricing dynamics, and product differentiation become visible and actionable. For caustic soda, the market architecture is assessed across application, end-use industry, form, product type, purity, and sales channel, with applications spanning alumina production, chemical manufacturing, pulp and paper, soap and detergent, and water treatment. Within pulp and paper the delineation between kraft pulp, mechanical pulp, and recycled pulp - and the further split of kraft into bleaching and non-bleaching segments - highlights differentiated caustic requirements driven by process chemistry and regulatory constraints. End-use industry dynamics, including chemical, metallurgy, petroleum, pulp and paper, and water treatment sectors, influence not only volumes but required grade and delivery cadence.

Form factor-flake, liquid, or solid-drives logistics, storage, and handling decisions; product type choices among diaphragm cell grade, membrane cell grade, and mercury cell grade reflect differences in production footprint, energy intensity, and environmental compliance. Purity classifications of food grade, industrial grade, and pharmaceutical grade establish technical and commercial segmentation that affects margins and customer relationships. Sales channel configurations between direct sales and distributors shape commercial reach and service models.

For urea, the market is examined across application, end-use industry, form, grade, and sales channel, where applications include chemical intermediate, feed additive, and fertilizer use. Fertilizer applications distinguish between foliar and soil application routes, and soil application further divides into basal dressing and topdressing practices, each with specific agronomic and logistics implications. End-use industries-agriculture, animal feed, and chemical manufacturing-exhibit distinct cyclicality and price sensitivity. Form variations of granular, liquid, and prill influence handling and blending options, while grades such as feed grade, fertilizer grade, and technical grade determine regulatory compliance and end-use suitability. Sales channels between direct sales and retailers and distributors frame how products reach end customers and how value-added services, such as application support and formulation, are delivered.

Taken together, these segmentation axes illuminate where differentiation matters most: process-driven industries and fertilizer channels prioritize consistent specification and supply reliability, specialty grades command premium positioning, and form factors dictate capital and logistical commitments. Aligning production capabilities and commercial go-to-market structures with these segmentation nuances creates clearer pathways to sustainable margin improvement and customer retention.

Regional dynamics and demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine production strategy, logistics, and regulatory exposure

Regional dynamics materially influence strategic choices for producers, traders, and end users, with the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each presenting distinctive demand drivers and operational realities. In the Americas, agricultural demand patterns and a relatively integrated domestic industrial base shape procurement strategies; proximity to feedstock sources and logistics networks favors large-scale distribution models, while policy changes and tariff considerations can rapidly shift sourcing preferences and investment horizons.

Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a complex interplay of regulatory rigor, energy transition policy, and import dependence variations. European regulatory frameworks emphasize emissions reductions and chemical safety, prompting investments in membrane technology and low-emissions ammonia pathways. The Middle East remains an important export-oriented production basin with competitive energy economics that support large-scale ammonia and urea synthesis, while subregions in Africa display growing fertilizer demand alongside infrastructure constraints that affect distribution and formulation choices.

Asia-Pacific is the pivotal production and consumption epicenter for both caustic soda and urea, where China and India drive aggregate demand and export dynamics. The region's industrialization patterns, coupled with government agricultural policies and the availability of low-cost feedstock in select jurisdictions, sustain high-capacity operations and ongoing plant modernization. Infrastructure, port logistics, and interregional trade agreements further determine how quickly supply adjustments propagate across borders.

How asset flexibility, vertical integration, technology investment, and partnership strategies are shaping competitive advantage among caustic soda and urea producers and suppliers

Competitive positioning in caustic soda and urea is increasingly defined by asset flexibility, ownership of upstream feedstocks, and the ability to invest in decarbonization. Vertically integrated producers that can capture synergies between ammonia production and urea synthesis or combine chlor-alkali operations with downstream derivatives benefit from cost optimization and commercial control. Conversely, specialized suppliers and distributors build value through service, formulation expertise, and local logistics networks that reduce friction for end customers.

Strategic investments in technology-membrane cells in chlor-alkali plants, low-carbon ammonia processes, and process automation-differentiate companies on energy intensity and environmental compliance. Partnerships and joint ventures remain common ways to share technology risk and access new markets, while M&A activity often focuses on acquiring regional footprints, specialty grades, or channel capabilities rather than pure volume growth. New entrants that emphasize green product credentials or niche grade supply can gain traction, but scale and feedstock security continue to confer meaningful resilience for established incumbents.

Actionable strategic initiatives combining supply resilience, targeted CAPEX, commercial differentiation, and policy engagement to strengthen competitive positioning

Industry leaders should pursue a balanced playbook that integrates near-term resilience measures with medium- and long-term transformation initiatives. First, securing feedstock and energy through diversified contracts and strategic hedging reduces exposure to input volatility and policy shifts. Capital projects should prioritize technology upgrades that deliver demonstrable energy and emissions improvements, such as membrane cell retrofits and ammonia plant decarbonization pathways, to align operational performance with evolving regulatory and customer expectations.

Commercially, companies should adapt sales models to provide value-added services that reflect segmentation realities: tailored formulations, blended fertilizers, and application advisory services for agricultural clients, and specification-driven supply for industrial end users. Expanding regional storage and distribution footprints can mitigate tariff impacts and shorten lead times. Additionally, embedding digital capabilities across procurement, plant operations, and customer engagement will improve responsiveness and margin capture. Finally, proactive engagement with policymakers and standards bodies, combined with scenario planning for tariff and trade permutations, will help firms anticipate change and position resources accordingly.

A robust research approach that integrates primary interviews, site-level technical audits, and secondary data triangulation to produce validated strategic insights and assumptions

The research methodology blends primary and secondary approaches to ensure robustness and practical relevance. Primary inputs include structured interviews with plant operations leaders, commercial managers, distributors, and large end users across chemicals and agriculture; operational site visits and process audits inform technical assessments of production technology and efficiency. Secondary research synthesizes regulatory texts, trade flow data, technical literature on chlor-alkali and ammonia-urea processes, and publicly available procurement and logistics information to contextualize primary findings.

Data triangulation and cross-validation are applied throughout to reconcile discrepancies and surface conservative interpretations where direct data is limited. Segmentation mapping aligns application and form factors to consumption behavior and logistical constraints. The methodology also documents assumptions, data limitations, and sensitivity checks to clarify the boundary conditions of the analysis. This approach is designed to produce a reliable diagnostic toolkit that supports strategic decision-making rather than a single deterministic projection.

Key strategic takeaways that synthesize resilience, decarbonization, and segmentation-driven commercial approaches to guide executive decision-making

Caustic soda and urea markets are being reshaped by a confluence of technology, policy, and commercial imperatives. Producers and buyers who prioritize process efficiency, low-carbon pathways, and segmentation-aligned commercial models will capture disproportionate value as the industry transitions. Flexibility in feedstock sourcing and logistics, combined with targeted investments in production modernization, are immediate levers for risk mitigation and margin preservation.

Looking ahead, the most successful organizations will be those that translate technical upgrades into commercial propositions-turning energy and emissions improvements into customer-facing differentiation-and that embed scenario planning to manage policy and trade uncertainties. By aligning operational investments with end-user needs across forms, grades, and channels, companies can sustain competitive resilience while participating in the broader decarbonization and digitalization trends shaping the sector.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Production

  • 8.1. Membrane cell process
  • 8.2. Diaphragm cell process

9. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Type

  • 9.1. Solid
  • 9.2. Liquid

10. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Water treatment
  • 10.2. Textiles
  • 10.3. Soaps & detergents
  • 10.4. Pulp & paper
  • 10.5. Organic chemical production
  • 10.6. Inorganic chemical production
  • 10.7. Alumina / aluminium refining

11. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by End-Use

  • 11.1. Chemical industry
  • 11.2. Automotive / emission control
  • 11.3. Animal feed
  • 11.4. Agriculture

12. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Caustic Soda & Urea Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Caustic Soda & Urea Market

16. China Caustic Soda & Urea Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
  • 17.6. DCM Shriram Ltd.
  • 17.7. Dow Inc.
  • 17.8. EuroChem Group AG
  • 17.9. FMC Corporation
  • 17.10. Formosa Plastics Corporation
  • 17.11. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
  • 17.12. INEOS Group Limited
  • 17.13. Nutrien Ltd
  • 17.14. OCI N.V.
  • 17.15. Olin Corporation
  • 17.16. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
  • 17.17. Yara International ASA

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE CELL PROCESS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE CELL PROCESS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE CELL PROCESS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM CELL PROCESS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM CELL PROCESS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM CELL PROCESS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOLID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOLID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOLID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY WATER TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY WATER TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY WATER TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TEXTILES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TEXTILES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TEXTILES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOAPS & DETERGENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOAPS & DETERGENTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SOAPS & DETERGENTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PULP & PAPER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PULP & PAPER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PULP & PAPER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC CHEMICAL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ALUMINA / ALUMINIUM REFINING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ALUMINA / ALUMINIUM REFINING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ALUMINA / ALUMINIUM REFINING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE / EMISSION CONTROL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE / EMISSION CONTROL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE / EMISSION CONTROL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AGRICULTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AGRICULTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY AGRICULTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. AMERICAS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. AMERICAS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. NORTH AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. NORTH AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. NORTH AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. NORTH AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. LATIN AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. LATIN AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. LATIN AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. LATIN AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. LATIN AMERICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. EUROPE CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. MIDDLE EAST CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. MIDDLE EAST CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AFRICA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GCC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPEAN UNION CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPEAN UNION CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. BRICS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. BRICS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. BRICS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. G7 CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. G7 CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. G7 CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. G7 CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NATO CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. NATO CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. NATO CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. NATO CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. NATO CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. UNITED STATES CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. CHINA CAUSTIC SODA & UREA MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)