查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1912433

半导体塑胶载带市场按产品类型、材料类型、厚度范围、宽度范围、应用和最终用户划分－全球预测（2026-2032 年）

Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market by Product Type, Material Type, Thickness Range, Width Range, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 187 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，半导体塑胶载带市场规模将达到 11.5 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 12.4 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 19.7 亿美元，年复合成长率为 7.91%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 11.5亿美元
预计年份：2026年 12.4亿美元
预测年份：2032年 19.7亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 7.91%

半导体塑胶载带在整个半导体组装和电子製造生态系统中扮演着至关重要的角色，它作为连接材料，在自动化处理过程中保护、运输和呈现元件。封装密度、表面黏着技术和拾放自动化技术的进步，对载带的外形尺寸、材料性能和尺寸稳定性提出了更高的要求。随着装置小型化和产能需求的不断增长，载带的各项特性，例如黏合剂相容性、静电耗散、尺寸公差和钻孔精度，对于维持元件完整性和确保下游製程产量比率而言，比以往任何时候都更加重要。

製造商、原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和合约组装都在寻求能够与高速卷对卷 (C2C) 製程无缝集成，同时满足汽车和航太领域安全关键型应用可靠性标准的材料。因此，创新如今已不再局限于原料聚合物的选择，而是扩展到专用涂层、工程化口袋形貌以及製程控制，以最大限度地减少拾取放置过程中的颗粒产生和机械应力。展望未来，产业将持续平衡成本、性能和供应稳定性，这需要对材料科学、零件搬运动态以及不断变化的法规环境（包括可接受的认证管道）有深入的了解。

技术、供应链、监管和永续性的压力如何重塑各行业的产品设计、采购和认证实践

受技术、监管和供应链等多方面因素的影响，塑胶载带市场环境正经历变革性的变化。在技​​术方面，先进封装技术和高密度组件的日益普及，正推动载带设计朝着高精度口袋、精细的覆膜性能以及低挥发性和高热稳定性材料的方向发展。因此，供应商正致力于提高模具精度，并开发聚合物配方，以满足新一代取放系统所需的机械公差。

评估近期美国关税趋势及其对筹资策略、供应商选择和总落地成本管理的影响

美国不断变化的关税政策增加了塑胶胶带供应商和买家采购及供应链规划的复杂性。对某些进口商品征收关税凸显了原产地归属、关税分类和价值链透明度的重要性。为此，采购部门正在调整其采购组合，以降低成本波动并维持关键生产线的供应连续性。

详细的細項分析揭示了产品类型、材料选择、应用、用例、最终用户可靠性要求、厚度和宽度等因素如何影响产品开发。

精细化的市场区隔观点揭示了影响需求模式和创新重点的产品和应用层面的动态。按产品类型划分，市场结构包括基带、盖带和口袋带。对于盖带而言，非穿孔型和穿孔型之间的差异决定了供应可靠性和密封性能；而对于口袋带而言，12mm、16mm、4mm 和 8mm 等不同间距决定了其与各种零件配置和自动化处理系统的兼容性。在材料类型，聚碳酸酯、聚酯、聚苯乙烯和聚氨酯之间的选择会影响热性能、尺寸稳定性和耐磨性，进而影响其与高温回流焊接製程和长期储存的兼容性。

区域趋势和策略性製造地决定了全球需求中心的合格前置作业时间、供应弹性和本地技术支援。

区域趋势在塑造塑胶载带解决方案的供应链网路、认证週期和上市速度方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在美洲，接近性大规模电子製造地以及汽车和工业OEM厂商的集中分布，使得灵活的供应链和本地认证服务成为可能，从而支持产品发布和衍生产品扩展期间的快速迭代。同时，欧洲、中东和非洲的市场环境复杂多样，法规结构严格，终端用户标准各异，因此需要本地化的测试能力和多层次的供应商生态系统，才能同时满足高可靠性航太客户和对成本敏感的工业买家的需求。

竞争洞察：专业化在模具、涂层、认证服务和区域扩张方面如何创造差异化并推动客户采纳

塑胶载带市场的竞争格局呈现出多元化的特点，既有专业的聚合物加工商，也有综合材料公司，还有提供模具涂层认证支援的附加价值服务供应商。主要企业透过投资精密模具、无尘室生产、涂层化学和分析技术来脱颖而出，从而确保一致的公差和低颗粒生成。载带製造商与取放设备製造商之间的策略联盟日益普遍，双方可以共同开发出优化生产效率和减少喷嘴磨损的载带结构和输送曲线。

为製造商和供应商提供切实可行的步骤，以加快认证进程、实现采购多元化，并将创新与客户的可靠性和永续性优先事项相契合。

产业领导者应采取有针对性的措施，增强供应链韧性，加快产品认证速度，并抓住不断变化的应用需求所带来的机会。首先，透过投资模组化模具和快速原型製作能力，缩短新型口袋和盖带配置的设计迭代週期。这将有助于缩短客户引入新组件配置的认证时间。其次，制定多元化筹资策略，将国内加工能力与合格的区域合作伙伴结合，以降低关税和物流风险，同时保持前置作业时间的应对力。

我们透明的调查方法结合了相关人员访谈、技术文献综述和同行检验，为包装和供应决策提供实际的见解。

这些研究结果所依据的调查方法，融合了与产业相关人员的直接对话和严谨的二手资料分析，以确保研究的深度和实用性。关键资讯是透过对多个终端使用者领域的采购经理、包装工程师和品管人员进行结构化访谈收集的，并辅以与模具专家和物流供应商的专案讨论。这些讨论主要围绕着认证流程的挑战、公差设定优先顺序以及零件处理​​中的成本、前置作业时间和性能之间的权衡。

概述材料创新、筹资策略和供应商合作，以提升零件处理领域的营运韧性和竞争优势。

总之，塑胶载带仍然是现代半导体组装的关键基础技术，材料选择、封装槽设计和製程控制的持续改进能够直接产量比率为更高的良率和更短的生产週期。技术进步、关税趋势和区域製造策略的相互作用正在重塑供应商和买家在资格认证、采购和产品开发方面的做法。积极投资精密模具、材料创新和区域转换能力的公司将更有能力保持营运灵活性，同时满足终端用户对高可靠性的严格要求。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 半导体塑胶载带市场（依产品类型划分）

  • 底胶带
  • 盖胶带
    • 非穿孔型
    • 穿孔型
  • 口袋胶带
    • 12mm间距
    • 16毫米间距
    • 4mm间距
    • 8mm间距

9. 半导体塑胶载带市场（依材料类型划分）

  • 聚碳酸酯
  • 聚酯纤维
  • 聚苯乙烯
  • 聚氨酯

第十章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依厚度范围划分）

  • 0.5～1.0mm
  • 0.5毫米或更小
  • 大于 1.0 毫米

第十一章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依宽度范围划分）

  • 8～16mm
  • 8毫米或更小
  • 超过16毫米

第十二章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依应用领域划分）

  • 捲带式磁带
  • 托盘包装
  • 管状包装

第十三章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依最终用户划分）

  • 航太/国防
  • 车
  • 家用电器
  • 工业的
  • 电讯

第十四章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依地区划分）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十五章 半导体塑胶载带市场（依类别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十六章 各国半导体塑胶载带市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国半导体塑胶载带市场

第十七章：中国半导体塑胶载带市场

第十九章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • 3M Company
  • Advantek Inc.
  • Asahi Kasei Corporation
  • Berry Global, Inc.
  • C-Pak Pte Ltd
  • ePAK International, Inc.
  • ITW ECPS（Illinois Tool Works Inc.）
  • Laser Tek Taiwan Co., Ltd.
  • Nippo Co., Ltd.
  • Nitto Denko Corporation
  • Oji F-Tex Co., Ltd.
  • Shin-Etsu Polymer Co., Ltd.
  • Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
  • Taiwan Carrier Tape Enterprise Co., Ltd.
  • Tek Pak Inc.
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB1399D

The Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market was valued at USD 1.15 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.24 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.91%, reaching USD 1.97 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.15 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.24 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1.97 billion
CAGR (%) 7.91%

The plastic carrier tape segment plays an indispensable role across semiconductor assembly and electronics manufacturing ecosystems, serving as the connective material that protects, transports, and presents components during automated handling. Advances in packaging density, surface mount technology, and pick-and-place automation have elevated expectations for tape geometry, material performance, and dimensional consistency. As device form factors shrink and throughput demands increase, tape attributes such as adhesion compatibility, static dissipation, dimensional tolerances, and perforation precision matter more than ever for preserving component integrity and ensuring downstream yield.

Manufacturers, OEMs, and contract assemblers demand materials that integrate seamlessly with high-speed reel-to-reel operations, while also meeting the reliability thresholds of safety-critical applications in automotive and aerospace. Consequently, innovation now extends beyond raw polymer selection to include specialized coatings, engineered pocket geometries, and process controls that minimize particulate generation and mechanical stress during pick-and-place. Looking ahead, the industry will continue to balance cost, performance, and supply resilience, which requires a nuanced understanding of material science, component handling dynamics, and the evolving regulatory environment that frames acceptable qualification pathways.

How technological, supply chain, regulatory, and sustainability pressures are reshaping product design, sourcing, and qualification practices across the industry

The landscape for plastic carrier tape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by convergence of technological, regulatory, and supply chain forces. On the technology front, increasing adoption of advanced packaging techniques and finer pitch components is pushing tape design toward higher precision pockets, refined cover tape properties, and materials engineered for lower outgassing and improved thermal stability. As a result, suppliers are investing in tooling accuracy and polymer formulation to meet the mechanical tolerances demanded by next-generation pick-and-place systems.

Simultaneously, the supply chain landscape is changing as manufacturers seek greater geographic diversification and robustness. Strategic sourcing now emphasizes multi-sourcing strategies and regional qualification capabilities to reduce single-point dependencies. Regulatory trends and tariff dynamics are prompting procurement teams to re-evaluate total landed costs and supplier risk profiles. Meanwhile, sustainability considerations and material circularity are gaining traction, encouraging research into recyclable polymers and reduced additive chemistries. Taken together, these shifts are redefining supplier-client relationships, accelerating product innovation cycles, and increasing the importance of integrated testing and qualification services that can validate tape performance across both legacy and emerging assembly processes.

Assessment of recent United States tariff shifts and how duty exposure is affecting sourcing strategies, supplier qualification, and total landed cost management

Tariff policy developments in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement and supply chain planning for plastic carrier tape suppliers and buyers. The imposition of duties on selected imports has raised attention to origin attribution, customs classification, and the importance of value-chain transparency. Procurement teams are responding by reconfiguring source portfolios to mitigate cost volatility and to maintain continuity of supply for critical production lines.

In practice, buyers are accelerating supplier qualification in nearer-shore locations and demanding greater contractual flexibility to manage duty exposure. Logistics providers and trading partners are adapting by offering customs optimization services and by helping clients explore alternative routes and classification strategies where compliant. For manufacturers that rely on imported intermediate materials, duties have underscored the value of vertical integration and local conversion capabilities as levers to control total landed costs. While tariff landscapes remain dynamic, firms that proactively model duty scenarios and incorporate them into supplier scorecards and cost-to-serve analyses will better preserve margins and maintain operational stability.

Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how product type, material choices, application use cases, end-user reliability requirements, thickness, and width shape product development

A granular segmentation perspective illuminates product- and application-level dynamics that influence demand patterns and innovation priorities. Based on Product Type, the landscape includes Base Tape, Cover Tape, and Pocket Tape; within Cover Tape the distinctions between non-perforated and perforated variants shape feed reliability and sealing characteristics, while Pocket Tape variations across 12mm pitch, 16mm pitch, 4mm pitch, and 8mm pitch define compatibility with diverse component geometries and automated handling systems. Based on Material Type, choices among polycarbonate, polyester, polystyrene, and polyurethane impact thermal performance, dimensional stability, and abrasion resistance, which in turn affect compatibility with high temperature reflow profiles and long-term storage.

Based on Application, solutions oriented toward tape and reel, tray packaging, and tube packaging exhibit different requirements for handling stress, static control, and mechanical restraint during transit. Based on End User, distinctive reliability demands from aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer electronics, industrial, and telecom segments drive divergent qualification standards and batch traceability expectations. Based on Thickness Range, options spanning 0.5 to 1.0 mm, less than 0.5 mm, and greater than 1.0 mm correlate to rigidity and pocket depth needs tied to component height and pick accuracy. Based on Width Range, configurations from 8 to 16 mm, under 8 mm, and over 16 mm determine reel compatibility and component density economics. By integrating these segmentation lenses, suppliers can prioritize development roadmaps that align material science investments with the end-user reliability regimes and automated handling constraints that ultimately determine adoption.

Regional dynamics and strategic manufacturing footprints that determine qualification lead times, supply resilience, and localized technical support across global demand centers

Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping supply networks, qualification cycles, and speed-to-market for plastic carrier tape solutions. In the Americas, proximity to large electronic manufacturing hubs and a concentration of automotive and industrial OEMs favor responsive supply arrangements and onshore qualification services, which support rapid iterations during product launches and variant ramps. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa reflects a heterogeneous landscape where stringent regulatory frameworks and diverse end-user standards necessitate localized testing capabilities and multi-tiered supplier ecosystems to serve both high-reliability aerospace customers and cost-sensitive industrial buyers.

Asia-Pacific continues to be a central hub for both component assembly and upstream polymer conversion, driving a dense supplier base and specialized manufacturing capabilities. This regional concentration enables economies of scale and rapid innovation cycles but also elevates interdependence risks related to logistics and policy shifts. Across all regions, geographic strategy matters not only for cost and lead time, but also for qualification latency, responsiveness to design changes, and the ability to provide localized technical support for assembly process integration. Companies that align regional manufacturing footprints with customer qualification requirements will maintain competitive agility in an increasingly interconnected supply environment.

Competitive landscape insights showing how specialization in tooling, coatings, qualification services, and regional presence creates differentiation and supports customer adoption

The competitive field for plastic carrier tape is characterized by a mix of specialized polymer converters, integrated materials firms, and value-added service providers that offer tooling, coating, and qualification support. Leading players differentiate through investments in precision tooling, cleanroom manufacturing, coating chemistries, and analytics that underpin consistent tolerances and low particulate generation. Strategic partnerships between tape producers and pick-and-place equipment manufacturers are becoming more common, enabling co-development of pocket geometries and cover tape feed profiles that optimize throughput and reduce nozzle wear.

Additionally, several suppliers are expanding capabilities into end-to-end packaging solutions, including certified traceability, lot-based testing, and qualification documentation tailored to regulated end-users in aerospace and automotive. Others are focusing on sustainability improvements, such as reformulated polymers and lower-impact production processes, to meet customer-directed environmental procurement requirements. The companies that succeed will blend technical differentiation with disciplined operational excellence, making investments in quality systems, customer-facing service models, and regional manufacturing presence to support rapid qualification and aftermarket support.

Actionable steps for manufacturers and suppliers to accelerate qualification, diversify sourcing, and align technical innovation with customer reliability and sustainability priorities

Industry leaders should take targeted actions to strengthen supply resilience, accelerate product qualification, and capture opportunities arising from evolving application requirements. First, invest in modular tooling and rapid prototyping capabilities to shorten design iteration cycles for new pocket geometries and cover tape formats; this will reduce time-to-qualify for customers deploying novel component form factors. Second, develop multi-sourcing strategies that pair domestic conversion capacity with qualified regional partners to mitigate duty exposure and logistics risk while preserving lead-time responsiveness.

Third, formalize technical partnerships with equipment OEMs and contract manufacturers to co-develop tape specifications that minimize pick-and-place failures and extend nozzle life. Fourth, prioritize material science investments that enhance thermal stability, reduce outgassing, and enable recyclable formulations where feasible, thereby addressing both reliability and sustainability requirements. Fifth, expand value-added services such as lot-level testing, digital traceability, and application engineering support so customers can accelerate qualification and reduce onboarding friction. By executing these actions, manufacturers can translate technical capabilities into differentiated commercial offerings and heightened customer retention.

Transparent methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and cross-validation to ensure practical and actionable insights for packaging and supply decisions

The research methodology underpinning these insights blends primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis to ensure both depth and practical relevance. Primary input was gathered through structured interviews with procurement leads, packaging engineers, and quality managers across multiple end-user segments, supplemented by targeted discussions with tooling specialists and logistics providers. These conversations focused on qualification pain points, tolerancing priorities, and the trade-offs organizations make between cost, lead time, and performance during component handling.

Secondary analysis incorporated technical literature on polymer properties, standards related to component packaging and handling, and publicly available regulatory guidance affecting cross-border trade and compliance. Data triangulation emphasized recurring themes rather than proprietary figures, with an emphasis on observable operational trends such as accelerated qualification cycles, the increasing importance of regional conversion, and the demand for low-particulate manufacturing. Throughout, methodological rigor was maintained by cross-validating claims from supplier and buyer interviews and by testing hypothesis-driven scenarios that reflect realistic procurement and production constraints.

Concluding synthesis that ties material innovation, sourcing strategies, and supplier collaboration to operational resilience and competitive differentiation in component handling

In conclusion, plastic carrier tape remains a critical enabler of modern semiconductor assembly, where incremental improvements in material selection, pocket geometry, and process control translate directly into higher yields and faster ramp cycles. The interplay of technological advancement, tariff dynamics, and regional manufacturing strategies is reshaping how suppliers and buyers approach qualification, sourcing, and product development. Companies that proactively invest in precise tooling, material innovation, and regional conversion capabilities will be better positioned to meet the stringent demands of high-reliability end-users while preserving operational agility.

Moving forward, alignment between tape providers and equipment OEMs, coupled with robust supplier qualification frameworks and diversified sourcing, will determine who can rapidly support evolving component densities and new packaging modalities. By focusing on actionable improvements that reduce qualification latency, lower handling risk, and enhance environmental performance, organizations can convert supply chain complexity into a source of competitive advantage rather than a constraint.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Base Tape
  • 8.2. Cover Tape
    • 8.2.1. Non Perforated
    • 8.2.2. Perforated
  • 8.3. Pocket Tape
    • 8.3.1. 12Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.2. 16Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.3. 4Mm Pitch
    • 8.3.4. 8Mm Pitch

9. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Material Type

  • 9.1. Polycarbonate
  • 9.2. Polyester
  • 9.3. Polystyrene
  • 9.4. Polyurethane

10. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Thickness Range

  • 10.1. 0.5 To 1.0 Mm
  • 10.2. <0.5 Mm
  • 10.3. >1.0 Mm

11. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Width Range

  • 11.1. 8 To 16 Mm
  • 11.2. <8 Mm
  • 11.3. >16 Mm

12. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Tape And Reel
  • 12.2. Tray Packaging
  • 12.3. Tube Packaging

13. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Aerospace & Defense
  • 13.2. Automotive
  • 13.3. Consumer Electronics
  • 13.4. Industrial
  • 13.5. Telecom

14. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market

18. China Plastic Carrier Tape for Semiconductor Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. 3M Company
  • 19.6. Advantek Inc.
  • 19.7. Asahi Kasei Corporation
  • 19.8. Berry Global, Inc.
  • 19.9. C-Pak Pte Ltd
  • 19.10. ePAK International, Inc.
  • 19.11. ITW ECPS (Illinois Tool Works Inc.)
  • 19.12. Laser Tek Taiwan Co., Ltd.
  • 19.13. Nippo Co., Ltd.
  • 19.14. Nitto Denko Corporation
  • 19.15. Oji F-Tex Co., Ltd.
  • 19.16. Shin-Etsu Polymer Co., Ltd.
  • 19.17. Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
  • 19.18. Taiwan Carrier Tape Enterprise Co., Ltd.
  • 19.19. Tek Pak Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY BASE TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY NON PERFORATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PERFORATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 12MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 16MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 4MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8MM PITCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYCARBONATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYSTYRENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYURETHANE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 0.5 TO 1.0 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <0.5 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >1.0 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 8 TO 16 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY <8 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY >16 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TAPE AND REEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TRAY PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TUBE PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AMERICAS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. NORTH AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. LATIN AMERICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. EUROPE PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. MIDDLE EAST PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. AFRICA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. ASIA-PACIFIC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. ASEAN PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GCC PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. EUROPEAN UNION PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. BRICS PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. G7 PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NATO PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. GLOBAL PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. UNITED STATES PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COVER TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY POCKET TAPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY THICKNESS RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WIDTH RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. CHINA PLASTIC CARRIER TAPE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)