查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
Guidehouse Insights 排行榜报告 - 先进点源碳捕集解决方案：评估八家先进点源碳捕集解决方案提供商的策略和执行情况
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1486359

Guidehouse Insights 排行榜报告 - 先进点源碳捕集解决方案：评估八家先进点源碳捕集解决方案提供商的策略和执行情况

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - Advanced Point-Source Carbon Capture Solutions Providers: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for Eight Advanced Point-Source Carbon Capture Solutions Providers
出版日期: | 出版商: Guidehouse Insights | 英文 52 Pages; 14 Tables, Charts & Figures | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

随着脱碳努力的势头增强，发生点碳捕获技术越来越受到关注，特别是在工业和发电等脱碳困难的领域。因此，无论是在专案进度或政策支援机制（例如税收抵免、碳价格、市场、直接补贴、跨CCUS 价值链的协调商业模式）方面，碳捕获、利用和封存（CCUS）都变得越来越重要。

然而，市场发展却落后于 2050 年实现二氧化碳净零排放的目标。在欧洲和北美等已开发市场，目前的障碍导致最终投资决策的进展速度比预期慢得多。儘管如此，CCUS 产业的成长仍在加速，随着供应商专案和技术的成熟、併购活动的增加以及政策和法律的变化，竞争格局可能会发生变化。

本报告评估了全球八家领先的商业规模点源碳捕集先进解决方案供应商——作为最新实际 CCUS 项目一部分的二氧化碳源头捕集解决方案。 - 每年捕集150 万吨二氧化碳的正在运作或开发中的项目。

顶级供应商

  • Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
  • Honeywell UOP
  • Linde
  • Air Liquide
  • Aker Carbon Capture
  • Air Products
  • Fluor

目录

第 1 章执行摘要

第二章市场概述

  • 市场定义
  • 市场驱动因素
    • 碳定价
    • 政府奖励措施
  • 市场限制因素
    • 商业模式
    • 成本高
    • 监理框架
  • 市场趋势

第 3 章 Guidehouse 见解排行榜

  • Guidehouse Insights 排行榜类别
    • 领导者
    • 竞争者
    • 课题者
    • 追踪者
  • Guidehouse Insights 排行榜网格

第四章公司排名

  • 简介
  • 领导者
    • Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies
    • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
    • Honeywell Universal Oil Products
  • 竞争者
    • Linde
    • Air Liquide
    • Aker Carbon Capture
    • Air Products
  • 课题者
    • Fluor Corporation
  • 追踪者
  • 计画进入的公司
    • NET Power
    • ION Clean Energy
    • Capsol Technologies
    • Carbon Capture America

第 5 章首字母缩写词和缩写词列表

第 6 章目录

第 7 章图表

第8章分析范围/方法

Product Code: LB-PSCC-24

As decarbonization efforts gain momentum, point-source carbon dioxide capture technology is attracting more attention, especially for hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as industry and power generation. As a result, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a growing industry, both in project development and in policy support mechanisms, including tax credits, carbon pricing, and markets; direct subsidies; and regulated business models that span the CCUS value chain.

Progress in market deployments has been slow, however, as has progress toward reaching net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050. In more mature markets such as Europe and North America, current barriers have rendered progress in reaching final investment decisions slower than expected. Still, growth of the CCUS industry is accelerating, and the competitive space is subject to change as vendor projects and technologies mature, merger and acquisition activity grows, and policies and legislation change.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard accesses advanced carbon capture solutions providers in commercial-scale point-source capture applications, where CO2 is captured at the point of emissions as a part of a contemporary commercial CCUS project. It identifies and ranks eight successful carbon capture solution providers with projects in commercial operation or advanced commercial development that cumulatively capture at least 1.5 million metric tons of CO2 per year.

Top Vendors

Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Honeywell UOP

Linde

Air Liquide

Aker Carbon Capture

Air Products

Fluor

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 Vendor Criteria
  • 1.3 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Market Drivers
    • 2.2.1 Pricing Carbon
    • 2.2.2 Government Incentives
  • 2.3 Market Barriers
    • 2.3.1 Business Models
    • 2.3.2 High Costs
    • 2.3.3 Regulatory Frameworks
  • 2.4 Market Trends
    • 2.4.1 Slowing Project Announcements
    • 2.4.2 Demand and Market Consolidation
    • 2.4.3 Innovation
    • 2.4.4 Evolving Business Models

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Leaders
    • 4.2.1 Shell Catalysts & Technologies/Technip Energies
    • 4.2.2 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
    • 4.2.3 Honeywell Universal Oil Products
  • 4.3 Contenders
    • 4.3.1 Linde
    • 4.3.2 Air Liquide
    • 4.3.3 Aker Carbon Capture
    • 4.3.4 Air Products
  • 4.4 Challengers
    • 4.4.1 Fluor Corporation
  • 4.5 Followers
  • 4.6 Upcoming Players
    • 4.6.1 NET Power
    • 4.6.2 ION Clean Energy
    • 4.6.3 Capsol Technologies
    • 4.6.4 Carbon Capture America

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1 Scope of Study
  • 8.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2 Project Status Definitions
    • 8.2.3 Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.3.1 Score Calculations
    • 8.2.4 Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.4.1 Strategy
      • 8.2.4.2 Execution

List of Tables

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores

Vendor Scores

Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria

Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

Shell Catalysts & Technologies / Technip Energies Strategy and Execution Score

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Strategy and Execution Scores

Honeywell Universal Oil Products Strategy and Execution Scores

Linde Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Air Liquide Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Aker Carbon Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Air Products Capture Strategy and Execution Scores

Fluor Strategy and Execution Scores