![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1830597
扩增实境耳机市场(按组件、产品类型和应用)—全球预测 2025-2032Augmented Reality Headsets Market by Component, Product Type, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,扩增实境耳机市场规模将成长至 416.9 亿美元,复合年增长率为 22.15%。
| 主要市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年2024年 | 84.1亿美元 |
| 预计2025年 | 103.1亿美元 |
| 预测年份:2032年 | 416.9亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率(%) | 22.15% |
扩增实境头戴装置已从早期原型发展成为一个生态系统,其特点是技术快速改进、商业试点不断扩展以及供应链活性化。应用环境需要清楚评估头戴设备技术在其创新生命週期中的位置、整合摩擦的程度,以及哪些终端使用者群体能够提供最直接的投资回报。这个方向透过区分基础平台的进步和企业在部署头戴式解决方案时面临的实际考量,为策略决策奠定了基础。
技术进步最显着的方面是微型光学元件、改进的感测器融合以及更高效的处理架构,这些架构可降低散热和功耗限制。同时,软体生态系统日趋成熟,能够提供更丰富的空间运算体验,并将装置功能与云端服务连结起来。这些趋势与舒适度、电池续航力和无缝互通性等使用者体验需求相互影响,同时在消费者和企业环境中获得长期认可。因此,相关人员必须在硬体工程优先顺序与平台级互通性和开发者生态系统奖励之间取得平衡。
营运采用考量需要专注于采购路径、与现有 IT 架构的整合以及人才培养。早期开发者已认识到,成功的试验计画需要结合可衡量的工作流程目标、清晰的变更管理计划以及使用者与开发者之间的迭代回馈循环。这些要素共同构成了一个实用的框架,可用于评估任何组织对 AR 头戴式设备采用的准备情况,并优先考虑能够带来永续价值的投资。
扩增实境头戴装置市场正在经历重大变革,这得益于硬体的进步、软体范式的演变以及消费者期望的不断变化。硬体创新优先考虑更轻薄的外形规格、更高保真度的显示器以及更先进的感测器阵列,从而带来更引人入胜的混合实境体验。同时,软体发展也正从单一供应商孤岛转向模组化架构,强调平台互通性、开发者工具链以及跨装置的内容可移植性。
经济和营运方面的变化也引人注目。供应链重组和对组件弹性的日益重视,促使设备製造商多元化筹资策略,并投资于与显示器、光学元件、处理器、感测器等主要供应商的更紧密合作。这提升了跨硬体、软体和服务的垂直协作的重要性,将託管服务和专业服务定位为企业成功采用的关键载体。同时,应用优先顺序也在改变。教育和培训倡议正在利用身临其境型体验进行技能传授;游戏继续突破图形和互动的界限;医疗保健强调程序指导和远程协作;工业製造侧重于免提信息传输;军事和零售用例分别强调关键任务和麵向客户的需求。
这种转变正在加速形成一个更丰富的合作伙伴生态系统:平台提供者透过更优质的工具和更清晰的收益路径奖励开发团体,系统整合商打包特定领域的解决方案,服务公司则嵌入生命週期交付以减少客户摩擦。最终结果是,一个能够提供可衡量营运成果,同时又能灵活满足特定领域需求的整合产品将获得回报的格局。
美国宣布的2025年关税将对扩增实境(AR) 头戴设备生态系统的筹资策略、全球供应链架构和采购决策产生重大影响。这些措施促使设备製造商和零件供应商重新评估其成本结构,并探索替代的生产布局。因此,企业正在加速近岸外包和供应商多元化,以减轻关税引发的成本波动的影响,并提高生产计划的可预测性。
关税环境也影响了策略性库存政策和合约签订方式。采购商和製造商修改了前置作业时间预期,并调整了合约条款,以因应未来贸易政策可能出现的变化。这些调整使得灵活的供应协议、关键零件的对冲策略以及与主要光学和半导体供应商签订的长期合作协议变得更加重要。同时,产品开发蓝图正在重新评估,以寻找在保持核心功能的同时减少关税敏感零件和简化设计的机会。
在生态系统层面,关税正在加强对整体拥有成本和生命週期服务模式的审查。企业更加重视可维护性、可升级性和远端管理,以延长设备寿命并保护其投资免受短期贸易政策不利因素的影响。对于解决方案提供者而言,关税压力和不断上升的客户期望凸显了垂直整合能力和弹性物流伙伴关係关係的策略优势,这些优势能够在保持服务连续性的同时应对政策波动。
关键细分洞察表明,必须从多个相互关联的维度来理解扩增实境头显生态系统,这些维度决定了产品策略和市场选择。硬体需要仔细注意电池、显示器、光学元件、处理器和感测器等各个组件,因为每个子组件都会直接影响人体工学、运行时间和感知保真度。
产品类型细分透过区分光学透视和视讯透视架构,进一步明确了工程和用例约束。光学透视系统倾向于低延迟迭加,通常适用于需要直接查看物理环境的场景。应用细分揭示了教育、游戏、医疗保健、工业製造、军事和零售领域的需求侧动态。教育和培训优先考虑易用性和内容生命週期管理;游戏重视图形保真度和低延迟;医疗保健要求临床级可靠性和合规性路径;工业製造需要坚固耐用的硬体并与操作技术整合;军事用例优先考虑稳健性和安全通讯;零售强调消费者体验和销售点整合。
整合这些细分领域,可以揭示哪些投资将产生最高的营运收益。例如,围绕显示和光学性能优化的设备能够带来更身临其境的消费者体验,而对感测器和处理器的投资,加上专业服务,则是工业和医疗保健部署的理想选择。同样,对降低内容创建成本并实现应用程式间互通性的平台软体的投资,对于加速跨多个应用领域的采用至关重要。
美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区不同的管理体制、行业专业化程度和买家成熟度决定了扩增实境头戴装置的区域动态,每个地区都呈现出独特的机会和限制因素。在美洲,製造业、医疗保健和培训领域强劲的企业需求和技术采购週期为试点专案和整合部署创造了肥沃的土壤。该地区还拥有集中的平台提供者和开发团体,可加速解决方案的开发和商业测试。
欧洲、中东和非洲地区呈现一系列复杂的驱动因素,严格的资料保护条例和职场安全法规影响着产品设计和部署策略,而先进製造和物流等区域产业丛集则促进了有针对性的采用。该地区通常强调标准合规性和互通性,青睐那些拥有强大隐私、安全和认证途径的供应商。相较之下,亚太地区拥有庞大的消费市场和强大的製造能力。该地区推动着组件级创新和成本效益,同时也支持快速面向消费者的实验,从而推动设备人体工学和使用者介面设计的发展。
这些区域模式对市场进入规划具有实际意义。设备製造商和解决方案供应商必须使其供应链布局与区域製造能力相协调,使其合规性和资料管理方法与区域法规相一致,并根据每个地区的企业采购惯例和开发者生态系统的实力定制其商业模式。策略性的区域伙伴关係和在地化服务营运可以显着提高这些不同市场的采用速度和客户满意度。
扩增实境(AR) 头戴装置领域公司之间的竞争动态,日益由硬体差异化、平台可及性和服务丰富度的相互作用所决定。拥有先进光学和显示功能的硬体製造商不仅拥有显着的感知优势,而且还依赖电池、处理器和感测器模组强大的供应商关係。同时,寻求吸引开发者的平台顾客购买倾向率正在投资强大的 API、开发者工具链和商业性奖励,以减少内容创作者的摩擦,从而提升相容硬体的价值。
服务提供者和系统整合正在透过捆绑专业服务、託管支援和专业领域知识,确立其策略地位并简化企业采用流程。这些公司充当着重要的中介机构,将技术能力转化为医疗、工业和培训应用领域中可衡量的营运成果。共同开发契约、供应和上市协议使企业能够整合优势,满足跨领域的客户需求。智慧财产权组合和标准参与度进一步区分了参与者,而为开放框架和互通性标准做出贡献的公司往往会获得广泛的生态系统吸引力。
随着商业部署规模的扩大,那些能够将卓越硬体与便利平台和弹性服务结合的公司将会成功。这种均衡的功能组合能够减少买家的摩擦,加快企业环境中的价值实现速度,并支援基于可升级性、安全性和可衡量营运成果的长期客户关係。
为了在不断发展的扩增实境头戴装置市场中保持竞争优势,产业领导者应采取双管齐下的策略,在加速客户价值实现的同时推动技术差异化。首先,优先进行工程投资,透过优化光学元件、显示器、感测器和处理器,大幅提升使用者舒适度和感官保真度。同时,在产品架构中建构模组化,实现组件级升级并延长设备使用寿命,从而减少企业客户在整个生命週期中的摩擦。这种方法既能维持产品竞争力,又能增强营运对供应链和政策变化的韧性。
其次,我们将透过投资平台开放性、领先的开发者工具以及面向重点垂直行业的套装专业服务,打造强大的软体和服务生态系统。我们将调整平台蓝图,使其与教育、游戏、医疗保健、工业製造、军事、零售等领域应用开发的需求保持一致,加速内容的创建和整合。我们将透过託管服务来补充这些技术工作,这些服务旨在降低部署复杂性,并透过明确的服务等级协议和针对特定主题的培训模组提供可预测的结果。
第三,他们将透过多元化采购、在适当情况下进行策略性近岸外包以及与显示器和处理器等关键零件建立长期供应商合作伙伴关係,增强供应链的弹性和采购敏捷性。最后,他们将采用与商业目标相符的市场推广框架,该框架结合了从试点到规模化的路径、明确的相关人员价值指标以及区域伙伴关係模式,以应对美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及商业性不同的监管和买家环境。这些行动将使领导者能够将技术进步转化为持续的市场吸引力。
本分析背后的调查方法将结构化的一手资料研究与全面的二次合成研究相结合,以确保获得可靠且可操作的见解。一手资料研究包括对设备工程师、平台架构师、采购主管和系统整合商的访谈,以了解实际部署挑战、组件权衡以及不断变化的采购标准。这些访谈检验了包括光学、感测器、处理器和电池技术在内的技术重点,并探讨了託管服务和专业服务在企业部署中的作用。
二次研究对供应商文件、监管指南、专利申请和公开资讯进行了三角测量,以绘製技术发展轨迹并识别供应链依赖。产品架构的比较分析区分了光学透视和视讯透视方法,重点在于延迟、合成能力和使用者体验影响。从教育、游戏、医疗保健、工业製造、军事和零售等特定行业的文献中获取了应用层级的洞察,以了解用例需求和采用障碍。
资料合成包括对访谈记录进行定性编码,并将主题与次要证据进行交叉检验,以确保一致性并分离出可靠的结果。此方法强调假设的透明度、涵盖硬体、服务、软体、产品类型和应用领域组件的细分定义的清晰度,以及关键分析步骤的可复製性,以方便客户检验。本调查方法支持切实可行的建议,这些建议既反映了全球各地区的技术现状,也反映了营运考量。
总而言之,扩增实境头显正处于曲折点,硬体改进、平台演进和服务编配正在融合,为企业和消费者创造实际的机会。光学、显示器、感测器和处理器领域的技术进步正在减少舒适度和沈浸感的历史障碍,而软体和服务创新则正在减少整合阻力,并加速营运效益的实现。这些互补的趋势使相关人员能够设计出一条平衡短期价值和长期平台投资的部署路径。
为了保护成本结构并确保连续性,策略性地关注供应链的韧性、美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域监管差异以及关税趋势的影响至关重要。同样重要的是,要使产品设计与每个垂直行业的独特需求一致,包括教育、游戏、医疗保健、工业製造、军事和零售。透过将专注的硬体创新与开放平台策略和深度服务能力相结合,企业可以减少采用阻力,并确保其 AR 头戴装置倡议取得可衡量的成果。
展望未来,我们将继续奖励那些整合跨职能能力(包括工程、软体、服务和供应链)以提供完整解决方案的公司。因此,企业主管和技术领导者应优先投资于增强互通性、强化开发者生态系统,并在采购和服务模式中建立弹性,以充分释放 AR 头戴装置的潜力。
The Augmented Reality Headsets Market is projected to grow by USD 41.69 billion at a CAGR of 22.15% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 8.41 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 10.31 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 41.69 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 22.15% |
Augmented reality headsets have moved beyond early prototypes to an ecosystem characterized by rapid technical refinement, expanding commercial pilots, and intensifying supply chain activity. The introductory landscape requires a clear appraisal of where headset technologies now sit in the innovation lifecycle, where integration friction remains, and which end-user segments are demonstrating the most immediate ROI. This orientation sets the stage for strategic decision-making by distinguishing between foundational platform advancements and the practical considerations enterprises face when deploying head-mounted solutions.
Technological progress has been most visible in miniaturization of optics, improvements in sensor fusion, and more efficient processing architectures that reduce heat and power constraints. Concurrently, software ecosystems are maturing to enable richer spatial computing experiences and to bridge device capabilities with cloud services. These trends interact with user experience imperatives: comfort, battery life, and seamless interoperability underpin long-term acceptance in both consumer and enterprise settings. As a result, stakeholders must balance hardware engineering priorities with platform-level interoperability and developer ecosystem incentives.
Operational deployment considerations now demand attention to procurement pathways, integration with existing IT architectures, and workforce training. Early adopters have learned that pilot programs succeed when paired with measurable workflow objectives, clear change management plans, and iterative feedback loops between users and developers. Taken together, these elements form the practical framework that any organization should use to evaluate readiness for broader AR headset adoption and to prioritize investments that will yield sustainable value.
The landscape for augmented reality headsets is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging hardware advances, evolving software paradigms, and shifting buyer expectations. Hardware innovation has prioritized lighter form factors, higher-fidelity displays, and improved sensor arrays that enable more compelling mixed-reality experiences; these engineering gains are altering product roadmaps and prompting adjacent industries to reassess integration opportunities. At the same time, software evolution is moving away from single-vendor silos toward modular architectures that emphasize platform interoperability, developer toolchains, and cross-device content portability.
Economic and operational shifts are also evident. Supply chain reconfiguration and a stronger emphasis on component resilience have prompted device makers to diversify sourcing strategies and invest in closer collaboration with key suppliers for displays, optics, processors, and sensors. This has increased the importance of vertical coordination across hardware, software, and services, and has elevated managed and professional services as critical vectors for successful enterprise adoption. In parallel, application priorities have shifted: education and training initiatives are leveraging immersive experiences for skills transfer, the gaming sector continues to push graphical and interaction boundaries, healthcare deployments emphasize procedural guidance and remote collaboration, industrial manufacturing focuses on hands-free information delivery, and military and retail use cases underscore mission-critical and customer-facing imperatives respectively.
These shifts are accelerating the formation of richer partner ecosystems. Platform providers are incentivizing developer communities through better tooling and clearer monetization pathways, systems integrators are packaging domain-specific solutions, and service firms are embedding lifecycle offerings to reduce client friction. The net effect is a landscape that rewards integrated offerings capable of delivering measurable operational outcomes while maintaining flexibility to address domain-specific requirements.
United States tariff actions announced for 2025 have exerted material influence on procurement strategies, global supply chain architecture, and sourcing decisions across the augmented reality headset ecosystem. These measures have prompted device manufacturers and component suppliers to reassess cost structures and to explore alternative manufacturing footprints. Consequently, firms have accelerated nearshoring and supplier diversification initiatives to mitigate exposure to tariff-driven cost volatility and to enhance predictability in production scheduling.
The tariff environment has also influenced strategic inventory policies and contracting approaches. Purchasers and manufacturers have revised lead-time expectations and adjusted contractual terms to account for the possibility of additional trade policy shifts. These adjustments have increased the prominence of flexible supply agreements, hedging strategies around critical components, and longer-term collaboration agreements with key optical and semiconductor vendors. In parallel, product development roadmaps have been re-evaluated to identify opportunities for component substitution and design simplification that reduce tariff-sensitive content while preserving core capabilities.
At the ecosystem level, tariffs have intensified scrutiny on total cost of ownership and lifecycle service models. Organizations are placing greater emphasis on serviceability, upgradability, and remote management to extend device longevity and to protect investments against near-term trade policy headwinds. For solution providers, the combination of tariff pressure and evolving customer expectations has underscored the strategic advantage of vertically integrated capabilities and resilient logistics partnerships that can respond to policy-driven disruptions while maintaining service continuity.
Key segmentation insights reveal that the augmented reality headset ecosystem must be understood through multiple interlocking dimensions that together shape product strategy and go-to-market choices. Based on component, the market is studied across Hardware, Services, and Software; Hardware warrants detailed attention across Battery, Display, Optics, Processor, and Sensors because each subcomponent directly affects ergonomics, run-time, and perceptual fidelity; Services bifurcate into Managed Services and Professional Services, reflecting an important distinction between ongoing operational support and one-time integration engagements; Software divides into Application Software and Platform Software, with platform layers determining developer adoption and application layers driving user-facing value.
Product type segmentation further clarifies engineering and use-case constraints by distinguishing between Optical See-Through and Video See-Through architectures; optical see-through systems favor low-latency overlays and are often prioritized for scenarios requiring direct view of the physical environment, whereas video see-through architectures enable full compositing and advanced image processing that can support richer virtual interactions but may introduce different power and latency trade-offs. Application segmentation illuminates demand-side dynamics across Education, Gaming, Healthcare, Industrial Manufacturing, Military, and Retail, each of which imposes distinct regulatory, ergonomic, and content requirements. Education and training prioritize ease of use and content lifecycle management, gaming emphasizes graphics fidelity and low latency, healthcare demands clinical-grade reliability and compliance pathways, industrial manufacturing requires durable hardware and integration with operational technology, military use cases emphasize ruggedization and secure communications, and retail focuses on consumer experience and point-of-sale integration.
Synthesizing these segmentation lenses highlights where investment yields the highest operational returns. For instance, devices optimized around display and optical performance will unlock more immersive consumer experiences, while investments in sensors and processors paired with professional services will best serve industrial and healthcare deployments. Similarly, platform software investments that lower the cost of content creation and enable cross-application interoperability are critical to accelerating adoption across multiple application domains.
Regional dynamics for augmented reality headsets are shaped by differing regulatory regimes, industrial specializations, and buyer maturity across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, each of which presents distinct opportunities and constraints. In the Americas, strong enterprise demand and technology procurement cycles in manufacturing, healthcare, and training create fertile ground for pilot programs and integrated deployments; the region also hosts a concentrated base of platform providers and developer communities that accelerate solution development and commercial testing.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous set of drivers: stringent data protection and workplace safety regulations influence product design and deployment strategies, while regional industrial clusters such as advanced manufacturing and logistics foster targeted adoption. The region often emphasizes standards compliance and interoperability, which favors vendors that demonstrate robust privacy, security, and certification pathways. In contrast, Asia-Pacific combines large-scale consumer markets with significant manufacturing capacity; this region drives component-level innovation and cost efficiencies, while also supporting rapid consumer-facing experimentation that pushes device ergonomics and user interface design.
These regional patterns create practical implications for go-to-market planning. Device makers and solution providers should align supply chain footprints with regional manufacturing capabilities, tailor compliance and data management approaches to local regulations, and calibrate commercial models to match enterprise procurement practices and developer ecosystem strength in each geography. Strategic regional partnerships and locally anchored service operations can materially improve adoption velocity and customer satisfaction across these distinct markets.
Competitive dynamics among companies operating in the augmented reality headset space are increasingly defined by the interplay of hardware differentiation, platform accessibility, and services depth. Hardware players that secure advanced optical and display capabilities gain important perceptual advantages, but they also depend on strong supplier relationships for batteries, processors, and sensor modules. Meanwhile, platform providers seeking to capture developer mindshare are investing in robust APIs, developer toolchains, and commercial incentives that reduce friction for content creators, thereby enhancing the value of compatible hardware.
Service providers and systems integrators are carving out strategic roles by bundling professional services, managed support, and domain expertise to simplify enterprise adoption. These firms act as essential intermediaries, translating technical capabilities into measurable operational outcomes across healthcare, industrial, and training applications. Partnerships and strategic alliances have become a prevalent route to scale: co-development deals, supply agreements, and joint go-to-market arrangements enable companies to combine strengths and address cross-cutting customer requirements. Intellectual property portfolios and standards participation further distinguish players, with firms that contribute to open frameworks and interop standards often achieving broader ecosystem traction.
As commercial deployments scale, successful companies will be those that blend hardware excellence with accessible platforms and resilient services. This balanced capability set reduces buyer friction, shortens time-to-value in enterprise settings, and supports longer-term customer relationships built on upgradability, security, and measurable operational outcomes.
Industry leaders should pursue a dual-track strategy that advances technical differentiation while accelerating customer value realization to maintain competitive advantage in the evolving augmented reality headset market. First, prioritize engineering investments that materially improve user comfort and sensory fidelity by targeting optimizations in optics, displays, sensors, and processors; concurrently, embed modularity into product architecture to enable component-level upgrades and to extend device service life, thereby reducing total lifecycle friction for enterprise customers. This approach preserves product competitiveness while supporting operational resilience against supply chain and policy shifts.
Second, cultivate a robust software and services ecosystem by investing in platform openness, superior developer tooling, and packaged professional services tailored to priority verticals. Align platform roadmaps with the needs of application developers in education, gaming, healthcare, industrial manufacturing, military, and retail to expedite content creation and integration. Complement these technical efforts with managed services offerings that reduce deployment complexity and provide predictable outcomes through defined service level agreements and domain-specific training modules.
Third, strengthen supply chain resilience and procurement agility through diversified sourcing, strategic nearshoring where appropriate, and long-term supplier collaborations for critical components such as displays and processors. Finally, adopt commercially aligned go-to-market frameworks that combine pilot-to-scale pathways, clear value metrics for stakeholders, and regional partnership models to address the distinct regulatory and buyer environment across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Collectively, these actions will position leaders to convert technical progress into sustained market traction.
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines structured primary inquiry with comprehensive secondary synthesis to ensure robust, actionable insights. Primary research included targeted interviews with device engineers, platform architects, procurement leads, and systems integrators to capture real-world deployment challenges, component trade-offs, and evolving buyer criteria. These conversations were designed to validate technical priorities such as optics, sensors, processors, and battery technologies, and to probe the role of managed services and professional services in enterprise rollouts.
Secondary research involved triangulating vendor documentation, regulatory guidance, patent filings, and public disclosures to map technology trajectories and to identify supply chain dependencies. Comparative analysis of product architectures distinguished optical see-through and video see-through approaches, clarifying their implications for latency, compositing capabilities, and user experience. Application-level insights were informed by domain-specific literature in education, gaming, healthcare, industrial manufacturing, military, and retail to understand use-case requirements and adoption barriers.
Data synthesis applied qualitative coding to interview transcripts and cross-validated themes against secondary evidence to ensure consistency and to isolate high-confidence findings. The approach emphasized transparency in assumptions, clarity in segmentation definitions-covering components across hardware, services, and software, product types, and application domains-and replication of key analytical steps to facilitate client validation. This methodology supports practical recommendations that reflect both technical realities and operational considerations across global regions.
In conclusion, augmented reality headsets sit at an inflection point where hardware refinement, platform evolution, and service orchestration converge to create tangible enterprise and consumer opportunities. Technical advancements in optics, displays, sensors, and processors are reducing historical barriers to comfort and immersion, while software and services innovations are lowering the friction of integration and accelerating the realization of operational benefits. These complementary trends enable stakeholders to design deployment pathways that balance near-term value with long-term platform investments.
Strategic attention to supply chain resilience, regional regulatory variation across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, and the implications of tariff dynamics is essential to protect cost structures and ensure continuity. Equally important is the alignment of product design with domain-specific requirements across education, gaming, healthcare, industrial manufacturing, military, and retail. By combining focused hardware innovation with open platform strategies and deep services capabilities, organizations can reduce adoption friction and secure measurable outcomes from AR headset initiatives.
The landscape will continue to reward firms that integrate cross-functional capabilities-engineering, software, services, and supply chain-to deliver complete solutions. Executives and technology leaders should therefore prioritize investments that strengthen interoperability, enhance developer ecosystems, and embed resilience into procurement and servicing models to capture the full potential of augmented reality headsets.