查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1927452

货柜航运服务市场按服务类型、货柜类型、运输方式、航线类型和最终用户产业划分－2026-2032年全球预测

Container Shipping Service Market by Service Type, Container Type, Shipping Mode, Route Type, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 185 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，货柜航运服务市场价值将达到 1,335.4 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 1,490.4 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 2975.5 亿美元，年复合成长率为 12.12%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 1335.4亿美元
预计年份：2026年 1490.4亿美元
预测年份 2032 2975.5亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 12.12%

为产业领导者提供简洁策略框架，阐述重塑货柜航运经济、服务交付和决策的各种融合力量。

货柜航运生态系统正处于关键的转折点，不断变化的贸易政策、运输创新和终端用户需求正在重塑传统的运输模式。产业相关人员面临传统营运复杂性和新压力的双重挑战，这需要更清晰的策略重点和更快的执行节奏。本执行摘要总结了影响承运商经济效益、航线规划和客户期望的最重要因素，为领导者评估近期风险和中期结构性变化提供了切实可行的观点。

多式联运、数位化协调和不断变化的客户需求如何共同重塑货柜航运网络和竞争策略

货柜航运业正经历着超越週期性运费波动的变革性变化；这些变化正在改变参与者之间的竞争与合作方式。多式联运的日益融合，包括先进的铁路和内河航运调度，使托运人和承运人能够重组其网络，从而提高可靠性并降低总运输成本。同时，数位化技术在视觉化平台、自动化码头营运和预测性维护等方面的应用，提高了资产利用率，同时也提升了供应链各环节服务透明度的期望。

评估2025年美国关税及其对全球货柜物流采购、路线和商业结构的系统性影响

美国2025年实施的关税政策，对海运成本和航线选择产生了持续影响。其累积效应不仅体现在关税直接推高到岸成本，也体现在对采购决策、库存策略和运输方式选择的间接影响。拥有全球采购基地的托运人正在重新审视其供应商组合和近岸外包方案，以降低关税风险并缩短前置作业时间。这也会影响特定贸易航线的货柜停留时间、调运需求和设备配置。

细分市场主导的营运和商业需求，例如服务模式、货柜类型、垂直产业需求、运输方式组合和路线配置，将塑造产品组合策略。

细分市场揭示了不同服务类型和货柜配置的关键营运和商业挑战，这对于制定有针对性的策略至关重要。按服务类型划分，整箱货运 (FCL) 业务满足托运人大批量货运需求，因此需要优先考虑舱位可靠性、端到端可视性和合约稳定性。同时，拼箱货运 (LCL) 服务需要高效的货柜中心、动态定价能力和严格的库存同步，才能创造利润并满足电子商务和分散式零售的需求。

美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域特征和基础设施现状将影响航运路线规划、运输方式选择和韧性策略。

区域趋势持续驱动着全球主要地区不同的优先事项和相互竞争的行为。在美洲，需求模式强调区域内互联互通以及与北美製造地的贸易流量，尤其註重平衡港口吞吐能力、卡车底盘可用性和内陆多式联运，以最大限度地减少滞期时间和滞期费。北美托运人越来越关注运输韧性和国内运力，这正在影响服务频率和支线网路的配置。

承运商、货运代理、租赁公司、码头营运商和技术提供者如何协调投资，以确保网路可靠性、客户差异化和可扩展成长

主要企业之间的竞争动态凸显了规模化、网路优化以及透过整合服务实现差异化服务的重点。全球班轮运输公司继续优先考虑船队运转率和联盟管理，以确保按时交付，同时寻求提高码头和内陆运输的营运效率。无船通用(NVOCC) 和货运代理商正在投资数位化平台和客户体验，以吸引那些寻求透明度和灵活合约条款的托运人的货运量。货柜租赁公司和租赁平台正在优化其资产组合，使其与货柜的生命週期和维护情况相匹配，以满足不断变化的需求。

经营团队可采取切实可行的策略步骤，以增强货运价格的抗风险能力，优化运输方式组合，并使车队和数位化投资与客户垂直行业的需求保持一致。

产业领导者应采取一系列切实可行的措施，以平衡短期韧性和长期竞争力。首先，将运费情境规划纳入商业合约和采购流程，以便在不造成过大成本衝击的情况下快速调整供应链。企业应将情境分析与风险共用、服务连续性的合约机制结合，以便在维护客户关係的同时保障利润。其次，应加快多式联运合作和内陆运输能力的重点投资，以便在海运航线面临关税或拥堵等不利因素时，高效地进行运输方式替代。

报告采用严谨的混合方法研究途径，结合了相关人员访谈、情境检验和交叉检验的二手分析，以确保得出可操作且可靠的结论。

本报告的调查方法结合了定性专家访谈、与关键相关人员的定向对话以及广泛的二手资料，以确保提供可靠的实用见解。主要研究包括与商业领袖、营运经理、码头专家和物流工程师进行结构化讨论，以收集关于服务设计、运力利用和货运响应策略的实际观点。此外，还开展了情境研讨会，在实际营运约束条件下对路线重新配置和运输方式转换进行压力测试。

最后总结了政策、交通运输进步和客户特定特征如何融合，从而重新定义韧性、差异化和卓越营运的优先事项。

总之，货柜航运正经历着一场多方面的变革，其驱动力包括政策调整、运输创新以及不断变化的客户期望。这些因素正在重塑整个价值链的运力分配、服务定价和合约结构。能够积极整合运费情​​境规划、投资多式联运和数位化能力并提供满足产业需求的客製化服务的领导企业，将增强自身的韧性并获得差异化价值。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席体验长观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 依服务类型分類的货柜航运服务市场

  • 整箱装载
  • 部分载入

9. 依货柜类型分類的货柜运输服务市场

  • 干货容器
    • 20英尺货柜
    • 40英尺货柜
    • 45英尺货柜
  • 平板式货柜
  • 敞顶容器
  • 冷藏货柜
  • 槽式货柜

10. 依运输方式分類的货柜航运服务市场

  • 多式联运
    • 内河航道
    • 铁路运输
    • 卡车运输
  • 海上运输

11. 依航线类型分類的货柜航运服务市场

  • 直飞
  • 接力运输

12. 依最终用户产业分類的货柜运输服务市场

  • 车
  • 食品/饮料
  • 製药
  • 零售

13. 各区域货柜航运服务市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十四章 货柜航运服务市场（依组别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

15. 各国货柜航运服务市场

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十六章：美国货柜航运服务市场

第十七章：中国货柜航运服务市场

第十八章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • AP Moller-Maersk A/S
  • CMA CGM SA
  • COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • Evergreen Marine Corporation（Taiwan）Ltd.
  • Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • HMM Co., Ltd.
  • Korea Marine Transport Co., Ltd.
  • Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
  • Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-4F7A6D4FF51D

The Container Shipping Service Market was valued at USD 133.54 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 149.04 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 12.12%, reaching USD 297.55 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 133.54 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 149.04 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 297.55 billion
CAGR (%) 12.12%

A concise strategic framing of converging forces reshaping container shipping economics, service delivery, and decision-making for industry leaders

The container shipping ecosystem stands at a pivotal juncture defined by evolving trade policies, modal innovation, and end-user demand reshaping traditional flows. Industry participants are navigating a blend of legacy operational complexity and emergent pressures that require clearer strategic priorities and faster execution rhythms. This executive summary synthesizes the most consequential forces influencing carrier economics, routing logic, and customer expectations, presenting a pragmatic lens for leaders to assess near-term risks and medium-term structural shifts.

This introduction frames the analysis by outlining the primary axes of change that inform the subsequent sections: regulatory and tariff movements that alter landed cost and route choices; technological and modal advances that affect service reliability and network configuration; and demand-side trends from key verticals including automotive, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and retail that dictate equipment utilization and scheduling. By establishing this context, the report equips readers with a common understanding of what is driving cost, service differentiation, and capital allocation across the industry.

Moving forward, executives should view the insights here as a diagnostic toolkit rather than prescriptive instruction. The goal is to enable rapid hypothesis testing within procurement, operations, and commercial teams so that strategy can be refined iteratively as policy and market conditions continue to evolve.

How intermodal integration, digital orchestration, and evolving customer requirements are jointly remapping container shipping networks and competitive strategies

The landscape for container shipping is experiencing transformative shifts that extend beyond cyclical freight rate movements, and these shifts are altering how participants compete and collaborate. Advances in intermodal integration, including more sophisticated rail and inland-waterway scheduling, are enabling shippers and carriers to reconfigure networks for improved reliability and lower total transport costs. Simultaneously, digital adoption across visibility platforms, automated terminal operations, and predictive maintenance is increasing asset productivity while raising expectations for service transparency across the supply chain.

Regulatory and policy shifts are further accelerating change by incentivizing modal substitution and by prompting carriers to revisit deployment strategies for specialized equipment such as refrigerated and tank containers. Demand polarization among end-use industries-where automotive and pharmaceuticals prioritize speed and traceability while retail and food and beverage balance cost and frequency-creates opportunities for differentiated service products, including premium guaranteed-time services and spot-responsive less-than-container-load solutions. These dynamics are prompting a re-evaluation of long-held assumptions about hub-and-spoke design, slot allocation, and partnership structures.

Consequently, successful organizations are those that adopt an adaptive strategy combining flexible asset management, targeted investments in digital orchestration, and closer commercial alignment with customers to co-design service offerings that reflect sector-specific needs. This combination positions them to capture value as supply chains evolve toward greater complexity and resilience.

Assessment of the 2025 United States tariff actions and their systemic effects on sourcing, routing, and commercial structures across global container logistics

Tariff actions originating from the United States in 2025 introduced a set of persistent cost and routing considerations that reverberate across oceanborne logistics. The cumulative impact is felt not only through direct tariff additions to landed cost but also via second-order effects on sourcing decisions, inventory strategies, and modal selection. Shippers with global sourcing footprints are reassessing supplier portfolios and nearshoring options to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten lead times, which in turn influences container dwelling, repositioning needs, and equipment mix on specific trade lanes.

Moreover, carriers and freight forwarders are responding by adjusting service frequencies, redeploying capacity, and in some cases re-routing to avoid tariff-affected transshipment points. These operational adjustments create pockets of congestion and capacity imbalances that can amplify variability in transit times and demurrage exposure. The tariff environment also incentivizes more sophisticated commercial clauses and risk-sharing mechanisms between shippers and carriers, including surcharges, contract re-negotiations, and enhanced data transparency for landed-cost reconciliation.

In aggregate, the tariffs are accelerating a broader shift toward supply chain resiliency practices: multi-sourcing, safety-stock recalibration, and stronger collaboration across logistics partners. Leaders who proactively model tariff scenarios and embed flexible contractual terms are better positioned to secure continuity while preserving margins and service levels in a more volatile policy landscape.

Segment-driven operational and commercial imperatives across service models, container types, vertical needs, modal mixes, and route configurations that inform portfolio strategy

Segmentation reveals distinct operational and commercial imperatives across service types and container configurations that are essential for targeted strategy development. Based on service type, Full Container Load operations require emphasis on slot reliability, end-to-end visibility, and contractual stability to support large-volume shippers, while Less Than Container Load offerings demand highly efficient consolidation hubs, dynamic pricing capability, and tight inventory synchronization to unlock margins and serve e-commerce and fragmented retail demand.

Examining container type shows that dry containers remain the backbone of general cargo flows and their common 20-foot, 40-foot, and 45-foot variants drive decisions about payload optimization and terminal handling practices. Specialized equipment such as flat rack, open top, refrigerated, and tank containers complicates fleet planning because each type has unique maintenance profiles, seasonal demand patterns, and stowage constraints. These differences necessitate differentiated commercial propositions and targeted fleet leasing or ownership strategies to avoid idle assets and to respond rapidly to end-user requirements.

End-use industry segmentation-including automotive, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and retail-underscores how vertical-specific needs shape service design: automotive favors scheduled, high-cadence services with tight quality controls; food and beverage and pharmaceuticals prioritize temperature control and traceability; while retail seeks flexibility and frequency to support promotional cycles. Shipping mode segmentation distinguishes between intermodal and sea freight; within intermodal the mix of inland waterways, rail transport, and truck transport affects lead-time variability and cost structures, requiring nuanced orchestration across terminals and hinterland partners. Finally, route type segmentation differentiates direct services from transshipment-based itineraries, where direct routes offer lead-time certainty and transshipment routes provide network reach at the cost of potential schedule risk. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables firms to tailor product portfolios, price architecture, and operating models to specific customer segments and trade lane characteristics.

Regional dynamics and infrastructure realities in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape route planning, modal choice, and resilience strategies

Regional dynamics continue to drive divergent priorities and competitive behaviors across the main global geographies. In the Americas, demand patterns emphasize intra-regional connectivity and trade flows to and from North American manufacturing hubs, with particular focus on balancing port capacity, truck chassis availability, and inland intermodal connections to minimize dwell and demurrage costs. North American shippers are increasingly focused on resilience and onshore capacity, which influences service frequency and the configuration of feeder networks.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex overlay of regulatory regimes, hinterland intermodal maturity, and diverse consumption profiles. European demand favors sustainability and modal shift initiatives that support rail and short-sea corridors, while ports in the Middle East are developing transshipment and value-added logistics capabilities to capture east-west flows. Africa's growing gateway investments and regional trade agreements are beginning to alter traditional routing choices, though infrastructure and regulatory heterogeneity continue to pose operational challenges and opportunities for early movers.

Asia-Pacific remains the principal source of manufactured exports and is characterized by dense port clusters, integrated manufacturing ecosystems, and varied regulatory approaches among economies. This region's container mix skews toward high-volume dry container usage, with strong seasonal peaks influenced by retail and consumer electronics cycles. Interdependencies among Asia-Pacific production centers and global consumption markets mean that disruptions within this region rapidly propagate across networks, underscoring the importance of diversified routing and capacity contingency planning.

How carriers, forwarders, lessors, terminal operators, and technology providers are aligning investments to secure network reliability, customer differentiation, and scalable growth

Competitive dynamics among key companies reveal a focus on scale, network optimization, and service differentiation through integrated offerings. Global liner carriers continue to prioritize fleet utilization and alliance management to preserve schedule integrity while exploring operational efficiencies at terminals and in hinterland drayage. Non-vessel operating common carriers and freight forwarders are investing in digital platforms and customer experience to capture volume from shippers seeking greater transparency and flexible contract terms. Container lessors and leasing platforms are optimizing portfolios to match lifecycle and maintenance profiles with demand volatility.

Port operators and terminal service providers are accelerating automation and capacity expansion to reduce berth congestion and improve turnaround times; meanwhile, technology vendors are scaling modular solutions for track-and-trace, capacity forecasting, and revenue management to support commercial teams. Strategic partnerships-ranging from slot exchanges to joint-venture feeder agreements-are becoming more common as firms seek to manage route coverage without incurring disproportionate capital expense. Additionally, companies with integrated cold chain capabilities and certified handling for pharmaceuticals are differentiating by offering end-to-end temperature-assured transport solutions that command premium pricing and deeper customer lock-in.

These company-level trends point to an industry where operational excellence, customer-centric digital services, and flexible commercial frameworks determine which players expand footprint and which ones become targets for consolidation or partnership.

Practical strategic moves for executives to strengthen tariff resilience, optimize modal mixes, and align fleet and digital investments with vertical customer demands

Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable moves that balance short-term resilience with long-term competitiveness. First, integrate tariff scenario planning into commercial contracting and procurement cycles so that supply chains can be rapidly rebalanced without undue cost shock. Firms should pair scenario analysis with contractual mechanisms that share risk and maintain service continuity, thereby protecting margins while preserving customer relationships. Second, accelerate targeted investments in intermodal orchestration and hinterland capacity so that modal substitution can be executed efficiently when oceanborne routes face tariff or congestion headwinds.

Third, align fleet composition and leasing strategies to match vertical demand characteristics and seasonalities; for instance, prioritize refrigerated and specialized equipment availability for temperature-sensitive industries while optimizing dry container sizing for retail and bulk manufacturing. Fourth, invest in digital visibility and predictive analytics to reduce dwell, improve asset turns, and enable dynamic pricing and capacity allocation. Finally, cultivate strategic partnerships across the value chain-including terminals, rail operators, and service aggregators-to build resilient routing options and to capture value through coordinated service bundles. Taken together, these actions position organizations to respond nimbly to policy shifts, customer demands, and operational disruptions while preserving service quality and financial discipline.

A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, scenario testing, and cross-validated secondary analysis to ensure actionable and reliable insights

The research methodology underpinning this report combines qualitative expert interviews, targeted primary stakeholder engagement, and extensive secondary source synthesis to ensure robust and actionable findings. Primary research included structured discussions with commercial leaders, operations managers, terminal specialists, and logistics technologists to capture on-the-ground perspectives about service design, equipment utilization, and tariff response strategies. These engagements were complemented by scenario workshops that stress-tested route reconfigurations and modal substitution under realistic operational constraints.

Secondary research entailed a disciplined review of regulatory notices, trade policy developments, carrier and terminal announcements, and academic and industry publications to build a factual baseline. Data triangulation methods were applied to cross-validate insights from different sources and to reconcile discrepancies in operational reporting. Segmentation frameworks were constructed by mapping service types, container categories, end-use verticals, shipping modes, and route configurations to observed behaviors and decision criteria. Finally, findings were synthesized into practical recommendations and scenario-based implications for commercial and operational stakeholders, ensuring that the conclusions are both evidence-based and implementation-focused.

Final synthesis of how policy, modal advances, and customer specificity converge to redefine priorities for resilience, differentiation, and operational excellence

In conclusion, container shipping is undergoing a multi-dimensional transformation driven by policy shifts, modal innovation, and evolving customer expectations. These forces are reshaping how capacity is allocated, how services are priced, and how contracts are structured across the value chain. Leaders who proactively integrate tariff scenario planning, invest in intermodal and digital capabilities, and tailor offerings to vertical-specific needs will enhance resilience and capture differentiated value.

Operational agility, underpinned by improved visibility and strategic partnerships, will be the defining capability for companies seeking to navigate uncertainty without sacrificing service levels. As the industry adapts, the interplay between regulatory developments and commercial response will continue to create both risk and opportunity. Decision-makers should therefore prioritize flexible execution plans, targeted capital deployment, and closer collaboration with customers and partners so that short-term volatility is managed while medium-term growth and efficiency objectives are advanced.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Container Shipping Service Market, by Service Type

  • 8.1. Full Container Load
  • 8.2. Less Than Container Load

9. Container Shipping Service Market, by Container Type

  • 9.1. Dry Container
    • 9.1.1. 20-Foot Container
    • 9.1.2. 40-Foot Container
    • 9.1.3. 45-Foot Container
  • 9.2. Flat Rack Container
  • 9.3. Open Top Container
  • 9.4. Refrigerated Container
  • 9.5. Tank Container

10. Container Shipping Service Market, by Shipping Mode

  • 10.1. Intermodal
    • 10.1.1. Inland Waterways
    • 10.1.2. Rail Transport
    • 10.1.3. Truck Transport
  • 10.2. Sea Freight

11. Container Shipping Service Market, by Route Type

  • 11.1. Direct
  • 11.2. Transshipment

12. Container Shipping Service Market, by End-Use Industry

  • 12.1. Automotive
  • 12.2. Food & Beverage
  • 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
  • 12.4. Retail

13. Container Shipping Service Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Container Shipping Service Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Container Shipping Service Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Container Shipping Service Market

17. China Container Shipping Service Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S
  • 18.6. CMA CGM S.A.
  • 18.7. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 18.8. Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan) Ltd.
  • 18.9. Hapag-Lloyd AG
  • 18.10. HMM Co., Ltd.
  • 18.11. Korea Marine Transport Co., Ltd.
  • 18.12. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
  • 18.13. Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.
  • 18.14. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
  • 18.15. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FULL CONTAINER LOAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN CONTAINER LOAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 20-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 40-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY 45-FOOT CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FLAT RACK CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN TOP CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATED CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TANK CONTAINER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INLAND WATERWAYS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RAIL TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SEA FREIGHT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSSHIPMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. LATIN AMERICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. MIDDLE EAST CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. AFRICA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASIA-PACIFIC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASEAN CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GCC CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. EUROPEAN UNION CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. BRICS CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. G7 CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NATO CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. GLOBAL CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. UNITED STATES CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY CONTAINER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY DRY CONTAINER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY SHIPPING MODE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY INTERMODAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY ROUTE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. CHINA CONTAINER SHIPPING SERVICE MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)