封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1744662

2032年欠平衡钻井市场预测:按部署类型、储存类型、技术、最终用户和地区进行的全球分析

Underbalanced Drilling Market Forecasts to 2032 - Global Analysis By Deployment Type, Reservoir Type, Technology, End User and By Geography

出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据,全球欠平衡钻井市场预计在 2025 年将达到 44 亿美元,到 2032 年将达到 77 亿美元,预测期内的复合年增长率为 8.2%。

欠平衡钻井 (UBD) 是一种先进的钻井技术,其特点是井筒压力被有意保持在低于地层压力的水平。这样一来,钻井过程中就会形成压力差,迫使地层流体进入井筒,从而降低地层损害风险并提高储存产能。 UBD 尤其适用于枯竭或敏感储存,因为常规钻井会导致严重的储存失稳或循环漏失。透过最大限度地减少钻井泥浆对地层的侵入,UBD 可以提高采收率并延长油井的生产寿命。专业设备和即时监控对于安全的 UBD 作业至关重要。

根据MMR的研究,预计到2023年,石油需求将增加686万桶/日。因此,世界各国政府正在製定具有吸引力的投资策略,以提高精製能力,这将进一步促进市场成长。例如,2018年,印度石油公司宣布了一项策略,将投资约248.3亿美元,用于提高炼油和钻井能力、增加石化产品产量、扩大油气业务以及扩展钻井程序。

全球能源需求不断成长,传统资源日益枯竭

全球能源消耗不断上升,加上易于开采的传统型油气蕴藏量持续下降,推动了对欠平衡钻井(UBD)等更先进钻井技术的需求。随着传统型油井产量下降,作业者正在寻找更有效率的方法,从复杂成熟的储存中提取碳氢化合物。 UBD技术能够在传统过平衡条件下难以钻探的环境中实现钻井。 UBD技术最大限度地减少了对储存的损害,并提高了产量,这对于满足日益增长的能源需求至关重要。此外,该技术还能提高緻密地层的采收率,并减少地层流体的侵入。

某些地层的井不稳定性

儘管欠平衡钻井技术优势显着,但它也面临技术限制,尤其是在处理不稳定地层时。在裂缝、疏鬆或高渗透性区域作业可能导致井筒崩坏或压差卡钻,从而危及安全和效率。在此类环境中管理微妙的压力平衡需要专业知识和即时监控系统。此外,在减压条件下维持井筒完整性的复杂性限制了欠平衡钻井在某些地区的广泛应用。这些挑战导致作业风险增加、停机时间延长,进而影响计划进度和盈利。

生产储层的早期检测和动态测试

UBD 在储存评估中具有独特优势,因为它可以在钻井过程中即时识别产层。这种即时回馈有助于作业者优化井眼轨迹,更精准地锁定产量区。无需中断各个测试阶段的作业,即可对各个区域进行动态测试,从而改善决策并降低探勘的不确定性。此外,该技术还能最大限度地减少地层损害,提升储存特性分析品质及长期生产性能。对更聪明、更具成本效益的勘探方法的需求日益增长,为 UBD 技术在传统型和传统型油田的应用创造了巨大的机会。

初期投资和营运成本高

进入欠平衡钻井的主要障碍之一是实施欠平衡钻井所需的巨额资本和营运支出。欠平衡钻井需要专用设备,例如旋转控制设备(RCD)、压缩机和先进的井控系统,这推高了整体成本。对熟练人员的需求以及全面的钻前分析进一步增加了财务和后勤需求。中小型业者可能难以证明这些领先成本的合理性,尤其是在油价波动的环境下。此外,营运过程中意外的技术问题也会推高成本,并使预算和计划规划更加复杂。

COVID-19的影响

新冠疫情对本就处于供需失衡状态的钻井市场造成了喜忧参半的影响。全球封锁和出行限制扰乱了供应链,推迟了钻井计划,并导致多个上游计划停工。但这场危机也迫使产业重新评估成本结构和营运效率。随着各公司寻求优化生产,同时最大限度地减少储存损害并提高经济效益,市场对不平衡钻井(UBD)等技术的兴趣日益浓厚。疫情加速了自动化和远端监控系统在钻井作业中的应用,间接促进了UBD在复杂井段的部署。从长远来看,这种转变预计将增强市场韧性并推动创新。

预测期内,压井装置部门预计将实现最大幅度成长

预计在预测期内,压井装置领域将占据最大的市场占有率,因为它在钻桿插入和移除过程中保持压力控制方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这些装置广泛应用于无法进行井下冷却的带压作业。它们能够处理高压差并提高作业安全性,使其成为不平衡压井(UBD)装置中不可或缺的组成部分。随着越来越多的作业公司转向欠平衡技术以最大限度地提高储存接触面积,对可靠压井设备的需求持续成长。此外,技术进步也使这些设备更有弹性多用,成本效益也更高。

预计预测期内油田服务公司部门的复合年增长率最高。

油田服务公司预计将在预测期内实现最高成长率,这得益于其在部署和管理诸如欠平衡钻井(UBD)等复杂钻井技术方面的专业知识。这些公司提供整合解决方案,将先进的设备、熟练的人员和数据分析相结合,以优化钻井效果。随着专业钻井服务外包的兴起,营运商越来越依赖服务供应商来管理欠平衡作业。油田数位化和绩效付费合约的趋势也推动了该领域的成长,这些趋势鼓励使用高效创新的钻井技术。

占比最大的地区:

预计亚太地区将在预测期内占据最大的市场占有率。这种优势可以归因于对石油和天然气探勘的巨额投资,尤其是在中国、印度和印尼等国家。随着能源需求的成长以及海上和陆上盆地新油田的开发,人们正在采用UBD技术来提高高难度储存的采收率。该地区政府的支持性政策以及与国际服务供应商的战略伙伴关係关係也在推动市场扩张。此外,各国国家石油公司也越来越重视提高钻井效率和减少对环境的影响。

复合年增长率最高的地区:

在预测期内,由于页岩气和緻密油等非传统资源的快速发展,北美地区预计将呈现最高的复合年增长率。尤其是美国,它已成为采用创新钻井技术来提高生产效率的领导者。该地区的营运商正在转向使用不间断钻井技术 (UBD) 来解决地层损害等问题,并提高成熟井的产量。良好的法规环境、完善的油田基础设施以及持续的技术进步,正在加速二迭纪和巴肯等主要盆地采用不间断钻井技术。

免费客製化服务:

订阅此报告的客户可以选择以下免费自订选项之一:

  • 公司简介
    • 全面分析其他市场参与者(最多 3 家公司)
    • 主要企业的SWOT分析(最多3家公司)
  • 地理细分
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家市场进行估计、预测和复合年增长率(註:基于可行性检查)
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 根据产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 研究范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 数据分析
    • 数据检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究资讯来源
    • 初级研究资讯来源
    • 次级研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场走势分析

  • 驱动程式
  • 限制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 技术分析
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19的影响

第四章 波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买家的议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争

5. 全球欠平衡钻井市场(依部署类型)

  • 不压井作业装置
  • 泥浆钻井
  • 非旋转头
  • 旋转头
  • 流动钻井
  • 挠曲油管钻井
  • 其他部署类型

6. 全球欠平衡钻井市场(依储存类型)

  • 非传统
    • 緻密气
    • 煤层气(CBM)
    • 页岩气
  • 传统的

7. 全球欠平衡钻井市场(按技术)

  • 气体注入
  • 泡棉注射
  • 气举钻井
  • 液体注射
  • 粉尘钻孔
  • 其他技术

8. 全球欠平衡钻井市场(依最终用户)

  • 石油和天然气探勘公司
  • 油田服务公司
  • 钻井承包商
  • 其他最终用户

9. 全球欠平衡钻井市场(按地区)

  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲国家
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东和非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东和非洲地区

第十章 重大进展

  • 协议、伙伴关係、合作和合资企业
  • 收购与合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十一章 公司概况

  • Schlumberger
  • Petrolor
  • Halliburton
  • National Oilwell Varco(NOV)
  • Weatherford International
  • Archer Limited
  • Trican Well Service
  • Superior Energy Services
  • Baker Hughes
  • Nabors Industries
  • AKITA Drilling Ltd.
  • Transocean
  • Calfrac Well Services
  • Maersk Drilling
  • Ensign Energy Services
  • Odfjell Drilling
  • Helmerich & Payne
  • NCS Multistage
Product Code: SMRC29710

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Underbalanced Drilling Market is accounted for $4.4 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $7.7 billion by 2032 growing at a CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast period. Underbalanced Drilling (UBD) is an advanced drilling technique in which the pressure in the wellbore is intentionally kept lower than the formation pressure. This creates a differential that allows formation fluids to flow into the wellbore while drilling, reducing the risk of formation damage and improving reservoir productivity. UBD is particularly useful in depleted or sensitive reservoirs where conventional drilling could cause severe wellbore instability or loss of circulation. By minimizing invasion of drilling fluids into the formation, it enhances recovery efficiency and extends the productive life of the well. Specialized equipment and real-time monitoring are essential for safe UBD operations.

According to MMR study, the oil demand is projected to grow by 6.86 Mn barrels a day by 2023. Thus, governments around the world have established attractive investment strategies to increase their refinery capacity that would further push market growth. For example, in 2018, Indian Oil Corporation declared its strategies to invest around USD 24.83 Bn to rise its refinery & drilling capacity, increase its petrochemical production, increase gas business, & extend its drilling procedure.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Increasing global energy demand and depletion of conventional resources

The rising worldwide energy consumption, coupled with the continuous decline of easily accessible conventional oil and gas reserves, is fueling the demand for more advanced drilling techniques such as underbalanced drilling (UBD). As conventional wells become less productive, operators are seeking more efficient methods to extract hydrocarbons from complex and mature reservoirs. UBD enables drilling in environments that would otherwise pose challenges under traditional overbalanced conditions. It minimizes reservoir damage and increases production rates, which is essential in meeting the surging energy requirements. Additionally, the technology supports enhanced recovery in tight formations and reduces formation fluid invasion.

Restraint:

Wellbore instability in certain formations

Despite its advantages, underbalanced drilling faces technical limitations, especially when dealing with unstable formations. Operating in fractured, unconsolidated, or highly permeable zones can lead to wellbore collapse or differential sticking, compromising both safety and efficiency. Managing the delicate balance of pressures in such environments requires specialized expertise and real-time monitoring systems. Furthermore, the complexity involved in maintaining well integrity under reduced pressure conditions limits the widespread adoption of UBD in certain regions. These challenges can lead to increased operational risks and downtime, affecting project timelines and profitability.

Opportunity:

Early detection and dynamic testing of productive intervals

UBD offers unique benefits in reservoir evaluation by allowing real-time identification of productive zones while drilling. This immediate feedback helps operators optimize well trajectories and target high-yield areas more accurately. The ability to test zones dynamically, without halting operations for separate testing phases, improves decision-making and reduces exploration uncertainty. Additionally, this technique minimizes formation damage, which enhances reservoir characterization and long-term production performance. The growing demand for smarter, more cost-efficient exploration methods is creating significant opportunities for UBD technology in both conventional and unconventional fields.

Threat:

High initial investment and operational costs

One of the key barriers to entry for underbalanced drilling is the significant capital and operational expenditure required for deployment. UBD necessitates specialized equipment such as rotating control devices (RCDs), compressors, and advanced well control systems, which add to the overall cost. The need for skilled personnel and thorough pre-drilling analysis further raises financial and logistical demands. Small- and mid-sized operators may find it difficult to justify these upfront expenses, especially in volatile oil price environments. Additionally, unforeseen technical issues during operations can escalate costs, making budgeting and project planning more complex.

Covid-19 Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic brought mixed consequences for the underbalanced drilling market. Global lockdowns and travel restrictions disrupted supply chains, delayed drilling schedules, and halted several upstream projects. However, the crisis also led to an industry-wide reevaluation of cost structures and operational efficiency. As companies sought to optimize production with minimal reservoir damage and better economics, interest in technologies like UBD increased. The pandemic accelerated the adoption of automation and remote monitoring systems in drilling operations, indirectly benefiting UBD deployment in complex wells. Long-term, these shifts are expected to enhance market resilience and drive technological innovation.

The snubbing units segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The snubbing units segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, due to their crucial role in maintaining pressure control while inserting or removing drill pipe. These units are widely used in live well operations where killing the well is not viable. Their ability to handle high-pressure differentials and improve operational safety makes them an essential component in UBD setups. As more operators shift towards underbalanced techniques to maximize reservoir contact, the demand for reliable snubbing equipment continues to rise. Additionally, technological advancements have made these units more versatile and cost-efficient.

The oilfield service companies segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Over the forecast period, the oilfield service companies segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, due to their expertise in deploying and managing complex drilling technologies like UBD. These companies offer integrated solutions, combining advanced equipment, skilled personnel, and data analytics to optimize drilling outcomes. With increasing outsourcing of specialized drilling services, operators are relying more on service providers to manage underbalanced operations. The segment's growth is also driven by the trend toward digital oilfields and performance-based contracts, which encourage the use of efficient and innovative drilling practices.

Region with largest share:

During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to hold the largest market share. This dominance is attributed to the region's substantial investment in oil and gas exploration, particularly in countries like China, India, and Indonesia. With growing energy demand and the development of new fields in offshore and onshore basins, UBD is being adopted to enhance recovery from challenging reservoirs. The region's supportive government policies and strategic partnerships with international service providers are also driving market expansion. Furthermore, national oil companies are increasingly focusing on improving drilling efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

Region with highest CAGR:

Over the forecast period, the North America region is anticipated to exhibit the highest CAGR, owing to the rapid development of unconventional resources such as shale gas and tight oil. The United States, in particular, has emerged as a leader in adopting innovative drilling technologies to increase production efficiency. Operators in the region are leveraging UBD to address issues like formation damage and to enhance production from mature wells. A favorable regulatory environment, well-established oilfield infrastructure, and continuous technological advancements are accelerating UBD adoption across key basins such as the Permian and Bakken.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players profiled in the Underbalanced Drilling Market include Schlumberger, Petrolor, Halliburton, National Oilwell Varco (NOV), Weatherford International, Archer Limited, Trican Well Service, Superior Energy Services, Baker Hughes, Nabors Industries, AKITA Drilling Ltd., Transocean, Calfrac Well Services, Maersk Drilling, Ensign Energy Services, Odfjell Drilling, Helmerich & Payne and NCS Multistage.

Key Developments:

In April 2025, Halliburton and Nabors Industries achieved the first fully automated surface and subsurface execution of rotary and slide drilling operations in Oman. The integration of the companies' digital solutions delivered land-based, closed-loop drilling solutions to improve operational efficiency, consistency, and real-time decision-making capabilities.

In April 2024, Global technology company SLB announced a partnership with Shell to deploy Petrel(TM) subsurface software across its assets worldwide. The adoption of Petrel software is designed to increase digital capabilities and drive operating cost efficiencies. Shell will use Petrel software powered by advanced AI to deliver seismic interpretation workflows.

Deployment Types Covered:

  • Snubbing Units
  • Mud Cap Drilling
  • Non-rotating Head
  • Rotating Head
  • Flow Drilling
  • Coiled Tubing Drilling
  • Other Deployment Types

Reservoir Types Covered:

  • Unconventional
  • Conventional

Technologies Covered:

  • Gas Injection
  • Foam Injection
  • Arlift Drilling
  • Liquid Injection
  • Dust Drilling
  • Other Technologies

End Users Covered:

  • Oil & Gas Exploration Companies
  • Oilfield Service Companies
  • Drilling Contractors
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Technology Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Deployment Type

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Snubbing Units
  • 5.3 Mud Cap Drilling
  • 5.4 Non-rotating Head
  • 5.5 Rotating Head
  • 5.6 Flow Drilling
  • 5.7 Coiled Tubing Drilling
  • 5.8 Other Deployment Types

6 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Reservoir Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Unconventional
    • 6.2.1 Tight Gas
    • 6.2.2 Coal Bed Methane (CBM)
    • 6.2.3 Shale Gas
  • 6.3 Conventional

7 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Technology

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Gas Injection
  • 7.3 Foam Injection
  • 7.4 Arlift Drilling
  • 7.5 Liquid Injection
  • 7.6 Dust Drilling
  • 7.7 Other Technologies

8 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By End User

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Oil & Gas Exploration Companies
  • 8.3 Oilfield Service Companies
  • 8.4 Drilling Contractors
  • 8.5 Other End Users

9 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market, By Geography

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 North America
    • 9.2.1 US
    • 9.2.2 Canada
    • 9.2.3 Mexico
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.2 UK
    • 9.3.3 Italy
    • 9.3.4 France
    • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 9.4 Asia Pacific
    • 9.4.1 Japan
    • 9.4.2 China
    • 9.4.3 India
    • 9.4.4 Australia
    • 9.4.5 New Zealand
    • 9.4.6 South Korea
    • 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 9.5 South America
    • 9.5.1 Argentina
    • 9.5.2 Brazil
    • 9.5.3 Chile
    • 9.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 9.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 9.6.2 UAE
    • 9.6.3 Qatar
    • 9.6.4 South Africa
    • 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

10 Key Developments

  • 10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 10.3 New Product Launch
  • 10.4 Expansions
  • 10.5 Other Key Strategies

11 Company Profiling

  • 11.1 Schlumberger
  • 11.2 Petrolor
  • 11.3 Halliburton
  • 11.4 National Oilwell Varco (NOV)
  • 11.5 Weatherford International
  • 11.6 Archer Limited
  • 11.7 Trican Well Service
  • 11.8 Superior Energy Services
  • 11.9 Baker Hughes
  • 11.10 Nabors Industries
  • 11.11 AKITA Drilling Ltd.
  • 11.12 Transocean
  • 11.13 Calfrac Well Services
  • 11.14 Maersk Drilling
  • 11.15 Ensign Energy Services
  • 11.16 Odfjell Drilling
  • 11.17 Helmerich & Payne
  • 11.18 NCS Multistage

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Region (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Deployment Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Snubbing Units (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Mud Cap Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Non-rotating Head (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Rotating Head (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Flow Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Coiled Tubing Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other Deployment Types (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Reservoir Type (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Unconventional (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Tight Gas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Coal Bed Methane (CBM) (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Shale Gas (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Conventional (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Technology (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Gas Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Foam Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Arlift Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Liquid Injection (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Dust Drilling (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other Technologies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By End User (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Oil & Gas Exploration Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Oilfield Service Companies (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Drilling Contractors (2024-2032) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Underbalanced Drilling Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2024-2032) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.